| |
Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands:
A Spiritual Practice for Achieving Unity
by Leon James
Date: 1985-2004
Part 1 of 4
Go to the other
parts: Part 1 || Part 2
|| Part
3 ||
Part 4
Note: You may want to consult
a more recent version
of this essay:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/wife.html
1. Prologue
One of the truly remarkable revelations
given in the Writings of Swedenborg is that the chief power and dynamic spiritual force
that animates the universe is conjugial love, the love that internally binds and unites
the minds of a husband and wife. Conjugial love is the chief love that rules all other
loves in the universe. Its extending power and influence can be seen in all living species
whose survival depends on male-female bonding for propagation. The supremacy of conjugial
love expresses God's chief purpose in creating and maintaining the universe. This purpose
is to create an ever growing heaven populated by angel couples who were born on some
earth, developed a spiritual mind by living rightly, then went on living to eternity in
one of the many heavenly societies Swedenborg has witnessed. The afterlife consists of a
heavenly life for soul-mates bonded in marriage love between a husband and a wife. This
life constitutes the highest human spiritual state and is called heaven. The inhabitants
of heaven are all human beings born on one of the many earths in the universe and are
called angels in the Writings. We can truly say that this revelation is indeed very good
news.
The bad news is that conjugial life does
not come to us automatically and that most people on this earth reject it and act against
it, especially men. The reason is that we inherit our parents' traits, both physical and
spiritual or mental. Scientists today are still unaware of these revelations in the
Writings. It is believed that psychological traits are not inherited, and is is not known
that psychological traits are spiritual organs constructed out of spiritual substances
from the spiritual world. These spiritual substances are carriers of the mental or
spiritual traits of the parents. We thus inherit tendencies that oppose conjugial love.
One example is people's desire to know more than one partner sexually. Individuals who
exhibit this interest out of religious or loyalty reasons, continue to experience the
desire for or interest in other partners. But conjugial love does not allow this interest
to remain in one's organic constitution, even when it is expressed merely hypothetically
or in fantasy.
"This tendency and proneness to
evils just mentioned, which is transmitted from parents to their children and descendants,
can only be broken down by a person being born anew by the Lord's help, a process called
regeneration. Without this not only does the tendency remain unbroken, but it is
reinforced by a succession of parents, becoming more prone to evils, and eventually to
every kind of evil." True Christian Religion Number 521
Another example of how conjugial love is
opposed by inherited traits is our desire for independence based on the false idea that
the individual is the unit of life and self-fulfillment. When people marry there is often
a feeling of loss of freedom due to the marriage bond. But this idea is false because the
bonds of marriage and union create a state of heavenly freedom while what is opposed to
this bond is rooted in infernal freedom, which is actually slavery to inherited evil
traits. Conjugial love establishes the married couple as the unit of human life giving the
partners a wholeness and completeness they do not have outside the union. Independence is
incompatible with wholeness, and this reality is resisted by many inherited and acquired
traits.
For conjugial love to develop with a
couple it is necessary for both husband and wife to overcome the inborn resistance they
have for it. Marriage starts in the external mind of the partners through commitment and
natural love for one another. This love is not yet conjugial love, which is a spiritual
love, and the relationship is not yet a spiritual one, not yet an inner union of minds. In
order for conjugial love to develop and grow the husband and wife must change their inner
character by defeating all the inherited forces that are opposed to their conjugial union.
The Writings teach that only couples who go beyond the external bond of marriage into an
internal union of minds, can be together as an angel couple in heaven. It is therefore of
the utmost importance to gain the knowledge of how to accomplish this since it doesn't
happen automatically even with married individuals who sincerely love each other from a
natural love and are devoted to each other from loyalty and friendship.
The Writings show how the natural love
between partners joinjed together through an external bond is not spiritually deep enough
and as soon as external conditions change and become a challenge, the love seems to
evaporate and instead there is anger, rage, resentment, and disdain. Due to the spiritual
constitution of men and women, there is more resistance to conjugial love on the part of
husbands. Wives are born with the inclination towards marriage and a desire to move on to
an internal or spiritual union, as long as the husband also desires it. Husbands on the
other hand are born with an inclination for having multiple sexual partners and feel
restricted and constricted by the marriage bond to one wife. As a result, husbands need
special help in order to be able to overcome their inborn resistance to conjugial love,
which is "the love for one of the sex," as the Writings put it, in contrast to
the "love of the sex," which is natural, not spiritual, and roving. The Doctrine
of the Wife is an expression we use to designate a philosophy of action for husbands based
on the Writings of Swedenborg and intended to help them overcome their resistance to
conjugial love.
In summary, this doctrine says that the
husband's regeneration or self-change efforts, to be successful, must be focused on his
wife and through his wife. She is to be accepted as the seeing eye in the marriage
relationship and he needs to agree to voluntarily subjugate all of his resistances to her
wisdom and inner perception in everything pertaining to their relationship. Swedenborg
explains the mechanism whereby the Lord gives a special perception to each wife about her
husband's affections and inclinations, knowledge which is not given to the husband so that
he is only dimly aware of his own inner tendencies. The spiritual purpose for this
difference in perceptual powers is to make the husband's regeneration dependent on his
wife. This is called "cleaving to the wife" in the Old Testament and is a Divine
commandment enjoined on every husband. Without following this commandment the husband
cannot be regenerated, hence cannot have an eternal marriage in heaven with this or any
other wife.
"People who are in a state of truly
conjugial love look to eternity in their marriage because eternity is inherent in this
love. Its eternity is owing to the fact that this love in the wife and wisdom in the
husband grow to eternity, and as these grow or progress, the partners enter more and more
deeply into the blessings of heaven - blessings which their wisdom and love of wisdom at
the same time carry concealed within them. If one were to snatch away an idea of eternity,
therefore, or if by some chance it should slip from their minds, it would be as though
they were cast down from heaven. (Conjugial Love No. 216)
In people who did not have conjugial
love there is no spiritual or inner bond, but only a natural or outer one; and if an inner
bond does not hold the outer one in its order and course, it does not last."
(Conjugial Love No. 320)
Conjugial union depends therefore on the
willigness of the two partners to modify their inner character into a form that makes them
fit together spiritually. Since husbands put up more resistance to this union than wives,
it is necessary to give them spiritual tools that can overcome their own internal
resistance.
See also
The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband
The Doctrine of the Wife is an expression I
use to designate a philosophy of doing for husbands based on the
Writings of Swedenborg. In essence, this doctrine says that the husband's
regeneration efforts, to be successful, must be focused on his wife and through his wife.
She is the seeing eye in the marriage relationship and he needs to voluntarily and
willingly subjugate all his resistances to her wisdom and inner perception. Swedenborg
explains the mechanism whereby God gives perception to each wife about her husband's
affections which is not given to the husband. The purpose being, obviously, to make the
husband's regeneration dependent on his reliance on the wife. This is called
"cleaving to the wife" and is a commandment of God enjoined on every husband.
Without this commandment the husband cannot be regenerated, hence cannot have an eternal
marriage with this or any other wife.
"In
people who did not have conjugial love there is no spiritual or inner bond, but only a
natural or outer one; and if an inner bond does not hold the outer one in its order and
course, it does not last" (CL 320). |
From
Swedenborg's Conjugial
Love
159.
(3)
A wife's will unites itself with her husband's understanding, and the husband's
understanding in consequence unites itself with his wife's will. The reason is that a male
is born to become a form of understanding, and a female to become a form of will that
loves the understanding of the male. It follows from this that the conjugial union is a
union of the wife's will with the husband's understanding, and a reciprocal union of the
husband's understanding with the wife's will. Everyone sees that there is a very close
union between understanding and will, and that the union is such that the one faculty can
enter into the other and find delight from and in that union.
From Swedenborg's
Heaven
and Hell
HH 369. Everyone, man or woman, enjoys
understanding and will; but with the man the understanding predominates, and with the
woman the will predominates, and the character is determined by that which predominates. Yet in marriages in the heavens there is no predominance; for the will of
the wife is also the husband's will, and the understanding of the husband is also the
wife's understanding, since each loves to will and think as the other, that is, mutually
and reciprocally. Thus are they conjoined into one. This is actual conjunction, for
the will of the wife enters into the understanding of the husband, and the understanding
of the husband into the will of the wife, and this especially when they look into one
another's faces . . . . From all this it can be established what the conjunction of minds
is that makes marriage and produces conjugial love in the heavens, namely, that one wishes
what is his own to be the other's, and this reciprocally. |
The above passages
clearly shows that the conjugial couple makes up a single angel in that the husband's
understanding is no longer united to his own will but to his wife's will. This is the
essential idea in the Doctrine of the Wife.
From
Swedenborg's
Conjugial
Love (CL 294)
"Every
man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so possesses a coldness
towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost elements.
(...) It comes from a lack of rationality on their part in matters of the spirit. Every
man who is irrational in matters of the spirit is inmostly cold to his wife and inmostly
warm toward harlots." |
I have discovered that husbands resist
the process of conjugial unification with such intensity and ferocity that it appears they
are hell-bent and insisting on destroying their union, their marriage, their heavenly
place with their wife. This is true whether the husband is a New
Church person or not. Even those husbands who love the Writings and consider it the
Word, experience this resistance and hatred for conjugial union. They are not aware of it
and they deny it, yet it is true. For the wife this is a major problem since by denying
their resistance and hatred, husbands neutralize the power of the wife to work towards the
conjugial unity. This makes the wife suffer and feel desperate. The
Doctrine of the Wife will help husbands become aware of their resistance and hatred of
their wife, which at first they deny, but later can acknowledge or confess, then change.
Husbands misread and sub-consciously distort the above passage, and many passages like it
which are mentioned in this article.
This distortion effect is natural and
inherited as well as fully supported and reinforced by a masculinized society and
culture. New Church husbands have a distinct opportunity to liberate themselves from
this inheritance, but it takes a method to achieve liberation from it. This method is the
Doctrine of the Wife, a collection of commandments given by the Lord to help New Church
husbands to achieve conjugial union. Like all genuine Doctrine of the Church, the Doctrine
of the Wife is spiritual out of a celestial origin, that is, from the Lord. All Doctrine
is given by the Lord to anyone who is willing to receive it. Without genuine Doctrine the
Writings cannot be understood.
1. Without doctrine no one
can understand the Word. 2. Without doctrine from the Word no one can fight against evils
and falsities, and disperse them. 3. Without doctrine from the Word no one within the
church, where the Word is, can become spiritual. 4. Doctrine can be acquired from no other
source than from the Word, and by none except those who are in illustration from the Lord.
5. All things of doctrine must be confirmed by the sense of the letter of the Word. AE
356
Note:
substitute "the Writings" where it says "the Word" and your eyes will
be opened! |
Many passages discussing men's
understanding and women's affections are interpreted as
meaning that men should rule over women (or "have predominance") in relation to
understanding or intellectual things, since men are born a form of understanding. Women on
the other hand, should rule (or "have predominance") in relation to affectional
things relating to feelings and love. We must draw a distinction between (a) What the Word
says in the literal, and (b) The conclusion we draw from it (=doctrine). In this case the
Word says that men are a form of understanding and women a form of love. But the erroneous
conclusion based on it says: (c) Therefore in matters of Church governance or some other
forensic or intellectual issue, men should predominate; but in matters of domestic order
and works of charity or community, women should predominate.
Part (a) is far from Part (c), as is
obvious. Part (c) is a political matter and whatever applications one makes to it from
Doctrine or the Word is neither the Word nor Doctrine. No part of the genuine Doctrine of
the Church or the Word says that men should predominate in Church administration or that
women should be excluded from it. The same is true of any human or social area: the
workplace, business, commerce, the military, education, science, engineering, parenthood,
politics, etc. In short, it is not correct to say that the Word or
the genuine doctrine of the Church gives men the Divine right to be have predominance over
women in any area whatsoever.
The claim that men should predominate
over women in decision making in any area of life is clearly a self-serving distortion of
a masculinized society. The distortion guarantees that men will rule over women in
everyday life--at home, Church, profession, or in managing things, making the final
decisions, prevailing in one's opinion, in short, creating a man's world. Instead, the passage above means that the husband's understanding should unite
with the wife's will. The will always rules the understanding, therefore this means
that it is the wife's affections that are to unite to the husband's understanding on a
voluntary basis by the husband. The affections in the will shape the cognitions in the
understanding. Thus it is the feminization of marriage that makes its sanctification--see
section below.
Whether you say "ruling over"
or "having predominance over" is the same thing in terms of the factual
consequences, which is that one rules over the other. But there is an essential difference
between ruling over someone by dominance or dominion, and ruling over someone by voluntary
submission. For instance, the police force in a democracy rules over the population in
daily activities in public places. This is not an oppression as long as the population
willingly and rationally submits to the authority of the law and its authorized or
licensed agents acting in a lawful manner. But in an autocratic country the law rules by
dominion and is hostile to the population. With the Doctrine of the Wife we are dealing
with the husband's voluntary and rational submission of his will and judgment to that of
his wife. If he refuses, there is nothing she can do since he has the greater power. In
other words, the husband must listen and follow the wife's directives in all things in
which they have interactions. This voluntary submission means that he has to re-adjust his
cognitions to harmonize with her affections. Obviously this must be
a voluntary submission on the part of the husband and not a dominion over him by his wife.
The latter of course is destructive of the conjugial union.
Note again the passage quoted above:
"Every man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so possesses
a coldness towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost
elements. (...) It comes from a lack of rationality on their part in matters of the
spirit. Every man who is irrational in matters of the spirit is inmostly cold to his wife
and inmostly warm toward harlots" (CL 294).
New Church people who acknowledge the
Writings as the Word may have this temptation: that because they possess the Third
Testament or the Latin Word, therefore they are spiritual. However the Writings clearly
teach that it is not the Word that makes the Church but the understanding of the Word, and
not even this, but the degree to which people live in accordance with their understanding
of the Word (AE 356). And so study and expertise in the Writings of Swedenborg does not in
itself make us spiritual. Therefore husbands who study the Writings and worship the Divine
Human remain natural, hate the conjugial, love the scortatory, and remain unregenerate to
the extent that they fail to live their daily life in accordance with their doctrine. The
Doctrine of the Wife helps husbands live their life according to their understanding of
Divine Truth. We must create adequate and effective doctrine for ourselves so that we may
strive to live according to it. It is in this striving alone that the Lord is present by
influx. Without this striving the Lord cannot be present in actuality.
See also
The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband
2. Preface
"A
woman's beauty resides in her gentle tenderness, and so in her exquisite powers of
feeling. This is the source of a woman's love for a man, and a man's love for a
woman." (CL 330). |
In the Heavenly Doctrines known as
Swedenborg's Writings, the Lord has given a number of new commandments to husbands who
aspire to become one angel with a conjugial wife. The Doctrine of the Wife is a collection
of these commandments and its purpose is to assist regenerating husbands in their
difficult task. The Doctrine of the Wife is doctrine based on Scripture because it is a
list of items collected and extracted from the Word. The Doctrine of the Wife is not an
opinion statement or philosophy but Divine Wisdom as received in revelation through
illustration from the Lord. The Doctrine of the Wife is an ever expanding body of
knowledge, even to infinity and eternity. Countless generations of regenerating husbands
will contribute to it through the expansion and deepening of our relationship to the Lord.
Through it conjugial love will return to this earth and the societies of earth will return
to a state of civilized paradise. This new state of culture and consciousness will be
higher than all the preceding states of humanity. This is the Lord's deep desire--as He
has revealed it to us in the Writings.
The future of
humanity thus depends on the success of husbands each learning to conjoin to his wife on
the internal plane of the mind. This internal conjunction is called conjugial
love and is the basis of all other loves in the universe. All other loves are
derivative of this one great love. But the husband cannot from his own self conjoin to his
wife in an internal way. He appears to be able to do this in the external mind, but he
cannot do anything at all in the internal mind for he cannot see the internal mind. It is
closed to his conscious awareness while he is still in the early
stages of regeneration. Only the angels inflow
into this internal mind but not the husband's own consciousness or effort. By
acknowledging the Doctrine of the Wife, and then striving to follow it, each husband is
spiritually empowered by the Lord to overcome himself and, to
enthrone the wife. To enthrone the wife means to conjoin his
affections with his wife's affections. This can be done only by loving her
affections, and that means following her will, for the will does what the affection loves.
Hence the Lord gave husbands a long list of commandments to follow in order to allow them
to achieve this internal union, each with their wife. The Doctrine of the Wife is not only
a collection of these commandments but an exposition of them to the best of our current
understanding.
Here are some examples of conjugial commandments for husbands:
(1) All human development is in relation
to marriage (see CL 191),
therefore unmarried men are to be considered "pre-husbands" in the sense we
think of "preschool" as a state that prepares for the real school. The
curriculum in biology and psychology, for instance, needs to introduce all concepts and
goals as a hierarchy with the top of it always being the conjugial couple.
(2) Husbands are wiser and more
spiritual than unmarried men (see CL 199).
The Lord's commandment in the Old and New Testaments that a man shall leave his father and
mother and cleave to his wife, means that the man should dethrone his own affections
("father and mother") and enthrone his wife's affections in his own mind, thus
to "cleave" unto her (see CL 194).
(3) Women's intelligence is like the
Lord's intelligence, but men's intelligence is not (CL 218).
Women's intelligence, like the Lord's, is "modest, gracious, peaceable, compliant,
soft and gentle," while men's is "critical, rough, resistant, argumentative, and
given to intemperance."
(4) Conjugial love is the state of
internal union between husband and wife and it is achieved when they will that their two
lives shall become one life (see CL 215).
Conjugial love is a biological growth process that is achieved when the wife's affections
are joined to the husband's cognitions, that is, the husband's cognitions are joined to
the wife's affections. This is not an automatic growth process that comes with
living together. It must be willed by both partners. The husband must will to conjoin his
own cognitions to his wife's affections. This is not easy to achieve and requires
persistent effort into which the Lord's power can inflow and achieve the union. The
husband can overcome his resistance entirely if he is willing to follow this one rule on a
daily and regular basis: When his wife expresses her affections in the form of a direct
request or an implied one, the husband has only these replies to give and follow:
-
Yes.
-
O.K.
-
That's right.
-
I will.
And never anything more than that, for
it is always defensive and disagreeable to the wife's affections.
(5) If marriage remains external or
fails altogether, it is always due to the husband's resistance and hatred of conjugial
love (see CL
216-217). Women never cease their striving to conjoin internally to their husbands.
There are women in hell of course, and we get to know the character of many through
Swedenborg's discussions with them. They have revealed that they abandoned their striving
for conjunction only after their husbands treated them cruelly and without love on a long
term basis, even to their whole life together. The women then chose to protect themselves
and fight back by learning the art of controlling and enslaving their men through
seduction and other subtle means. But they would not have done this if their husbands had
treated them decently.
(6) To the husband's sensual
consciousness, which is that of the external mind, the wife appears as an object of sexual
desire. He imagines that the desire is from himself and that she is its object. But when a
husband's rational consciousness is awakened in his internal mind, he can see that the
wife is not the object but the source of his desire (see CL 221-223).
If you remove the wife's influx of sexual desire into her husband, the husband loses all
feeling and interest for the female sex. This secret is kept by wives since they can
notice that the man is made impotent and turns away when he experiences the woman's love
entering him. But after they are conjoined in the internal mind, the wife shares all her
feelings and expresses all her emotions without fear or ill effect on the husband.
(7) Conjugial love grows biologically
through repeatedly going through these four conjoining steps on a daily and hourly basis:
-
Step 1: The
wife acts. She reveals her affections to her husband in the form of a direct or implied
request.
-
Step 2: the
husband receives. He wills himself to love her affection, and by this, he receives it,
that is, conjoins his cognitions to it. Her affection now is as-if his own.
-
Step 3: the
husband reacts. He says one or more of these four things: Yes. O.K.
That's right. I will.
-
Step 4: the
wife reacts to the husband. She feels his reaction of conjunction as her bosom delight
(see CL
293-294).
This commandment says that the husband
must strive constantly to build up the network of conjoining between his cognitions and
his wife's affections. Think about muscle building exercises, how we repeat the same
movement in series or sets during one workout session. Muscle tissue is built up, fiber by
fiber, molecule by molecule, with each repetition of a movement. In a similar manner the
husband builds up the fibers of conjunction with his wife with the series and sets of
repetitions on a daily basis, even an hourly basis or more. Here is a common example
every man can relate to:
Steps |
The
usual way
(does not build any conjoining fibers) |
The
conjugial way
(builds conjoining fibers) |
1 |
Wife
says: Honey, let's talk about this tomorrow (=her request or opening act). |
Wife
says: Honey, let's talk about this tomorrow (=her request or opening act). |
2 |
The
husband internally disagrees (=hates conjugial unity). He wants to tell her several
reasons why they should talk about it now (=discounts her intelligence). He thinks about
those reasons and loves them (=holding on to father and mother). |
He is
conscious of an inner feeling of anger and his mind begins to rehearse reasons why they
should talk about it now. But he just laughs at himself doing that. He turns away from
himself and turns to his wife and to her desire and intention (or affection). He embraces
her affection and immerses himself in it (=cleaves to his wife). |
3 |
He says:
You don't understand. And keeps talking for several more sentences (=striving to coerce
her behavior and deny her freedom). |
He says:
O.K. Sure. |
4 |
The wife
senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of internal
separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his cognition to
her affection. |
The wife
senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining with
her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affection and his cognition are now united and
function as one conjoint individual (=angel). |
Many many times my poor wife tried to
tell me that I talk to her defensively. A family trait, she added, to spurn me on to
insight. For years, yea-- decades, my response was to deny that I was defensive. Each time
we went through this routine, the conjugial separation she felt was made more
painful and desperate. What could she do to break down this wall of blindness and denial?
She was getting so tired. She was getting no relief, year after year. At last the Doctrine
of the Wife happened in my life. The Lord showed me in illustration while reading the Word
that Hearken Unto Sarah was a commandment. Later I was able to see the biological
perspective on the Doctrine of the Wife. That's when my regeneration really started
showing results. For a long time I merely was able to compel my external behavior, putting
on a pleasant expression on my face and compelling my mouth to express the opposite
of the defensive and offensive things I thought and felt whenever she was in my face and
not budging an inch. She would never never compromise.
At first my wife was cowed into silent
and passive acceptance of my affections. She loved my cognitions and instantly and
constantly conjoined herself with them, making them as-if her own. She saw and understood
what I saw and understood about anything and everything I had an interest in. She was my
cognitive clone. But she was more than this for she had her own cognitive mind and she
deftly used my cognitions in all situations, far surpassing me in many kinds of things. I
admired her. I was not jealous of her. I felt superior and inferior to her. But she did
not love my affections.
And I thank the Lord for that. She
battled my affections fiercely for years. She tried to show me that my affections were not
mine but instilled in me by my family and upbringing. All this happened before I met her.
Now that I married her, she argued, I was supposed to abandon my family affections and
espouse hers. then we can make a true couple. I went along with this idea philosophically,
but not actually. At last the Lord sent the Doctrine of the Wife. Now I was able to see
the many commandments the Lord gives in the Writings. Eventually I was able to accept,
love, and promote the idea of the Doctrine of the Wife. I know that my wife is
appreciative. I no longer make her cry on a regular basis! From the cold frozen tundra
where I made a house for her, I brought her away from the North and built a house in
the East where we sojourn happily towards the real paradise of internal conjugial union.
This is the house of the Doctrine of the Wife.
Date:
Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:08:12 -1000
To: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu
Subject: Re: Yes. OK. I will. That's right.
Leon,
I think one thing that I've not realized fully before is that the Doctrine of the Wife is
not your own invention, your own fancy. It is built solidly upon the Word and the
Writings.
It is not your ingenuity, you are but the channel. Your skill and talent may however be to
present it in the modern idiom.
I'm beginning to see that the DOW is indeed the deepest and ultimate yoga we as men can
submit ourselves to. Perhaps because it goes so directly against our grain.
I'm trying to practice it more and more each day. But it is not easy. In the past I always
projected my irritation and anger to my wife, punishing her for my inadequacies.. Now I
try to curb the process. Some days I'm more successful than others.
Peace,
A. |
Here is another common example. Remember
the four steps of forming a conjugial fiber:
-
Step 1: The
wife acts. She reveals her affections to her husband in the form of a direct or implied
request.
-
Step 2: the
husband receives. He wills himself to love her affection, and by this, he receives it,
that is, conjoins his cognitions to it. Her affection now is as-if his own.
-
Step 3: the
husband reacts. He says one or more of these four things: Yes. O.K.
That's right. I will.
-
Step 4: the
wife reacts to the husband. She feels his reaction of conjunction as her bosom delight
(see CL
293-294).
Steps |
The
usual way
(does not build conjoining fibers) |
The
conjugial way
(builds conjoining fibers) |
1 |
Wife
continues to clean up and arrange things while husband watches the news. She is very much
aware that she is doing this in front of him. Is he going to ignore her, she wonders. She
is letting him see that she is determined to finish. |
Wife
continues to clean up and arrange things while husband watches the news. She is very much
aware that she is doing this in front of him. Is he going to ignore her, she wonders. She
is letting him see that she is determined to finish. |
2 |
The
husband sees her but feels cold for her. He hates the fact she picks this time to
buzz around the room, trying to make him feel guilty, no doubt, he tells himself
(=discounts her intelligence). He thinks about many reasons why she is wrong and he is
right, and loves them (=holding on to father and mother). |
The
husband sees her and is instantly aroused by the sight of her slaving away while he does
what pleases him. How can he ignore her affection in completing this task? It doesn't make
a difference what he thinks about it. Here she is and he must respond. He sees her
presence as his business and he makes himself accept the affection that animates her task
orientation (=cleaves to his wife). |
3 |
He says:
Honey, do you have to do that now? (=striving to coerce her behavior and deny her
freedom). |
He
immediately presses the mute button, gets up, and begins to facilitate her movements. It's
as if he said "O.K. I will" to her silent request for sympathy and recognition. |
4 |
The wife
senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of internal
separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his cognition to
her affection. |
The wife
senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining with
her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affection and his cognition are now united and
function as one conjoint individual (=angel). |
Here is a third example:
|
The
usual way
(does
not build conjoining fibers) |
The
conjugial way
(builds
conjoining fibers) |
Step 1: The wife acts |
They are in traffic.
Husband is driving. Wife says: Honey, its very stressful driving in the fast
lane. Can you please stay in the right lane? (=her affectional request). |
Ditto |
Step 2: The husband receives (or rejects) |
The
husband instantly feels rage (=hates conjugial unity and feels its a loss of
individuality). Its actually safer in this lane. Just let me handle it.
(=discounts her intelligence). I told you before. Leave the driving to the driver.
Thats the way it should be. (=holding on to father and mother which he
shouldnt do). |
He
is conscious of an inner feeling of anger and annoyance at her interfering with what he
wants to do. But he makes himself look at the situation from her perspective. He turns
away from himself and turns to his wife and to her affection and intention.(=cleaves to
his wife). He has compassion for her fears. |
Step 3: The husband reacts |
He
says: Do some deep breathing and relax. You know I hate it when you tell me how to
drive. (=striving to coerce her behavior and deny her freedom). |
He
says: O.K. Ill switch lanes as soon as I can. |
Step 4: The wife reacts to the husband |
The
wife senses her husband's conjugial cold and experiences the pain and loneliness of
internal separation. In her chest she senses his rejection or refusal to conjoin his
thoughts to her affection. |
The
wife senses conjugial delight in her chest and experiences her husband's act of conjoining
with her (=one flesh). One more pair of her affections and his thoughts are now united and
function as one conjoint individual (=angel). |
"It
is therefore provided by the Lord that conjugial pairs be born, and they are raised and
continually prepared for their marriages, neither the boy nor the girl being aware of the
fact. Then, after a period of time, the girl - now a marriageable young woman - and the
boy - now a young man able to marry - meet somewhere, as though by fate, and notice each
other. And they immediately recognize, as if by a kind of instinct, that they are a match,
thinking to themselves from a kind of inner dictate, the young man, 'she is mine,' and the
young woman, 'he is mine'" (CL 316). |
Women have a perception of truth that is
more immediate than that of men, whose understanding in comparison is laborious, even
pompous. So for women I want to state what is the Doctrine of the Wife in a nutshell (men
will need the whole article to understand it, let alone accept it). It is this:
Even though men are born understandings
and receive wisdom from the Lord, they cannot hold on to this wisdom or make it their own,
unless and until they love their wife's judgment above their own judgment. The husband's
wisdom, when genuine, is to know this. The husband's conjugial love is to love this.
The reason for this is that the wife's
wisdom is inmost and celestial, from the Lord. The wife's conjugial love is to love the
husband's wisdom to the extent it is genuine. Until the husband accepts the Doctrine of
the Wife, he is in the delusion that he has genuine understanding of his own, from the
Lord, independently of the wife.
This delusion is confirmed by doctrinal
heresies they fabricate from the literal of the Writings. In this state of mind they
discriminate against women, discount their judgment, and abuse them. This they refuse to
recognize. Thus they are trapped. The Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands is my way of
sharing with them what I have learned and what I was given to discover. In this way I
invite all husbands to follow the practices enjoined by the Doctrine of the Wife so that
they may have conjugial love, and thus eternal union with their wife.
Wives who read the Doctrine of the Wife
for Husbands will experience a deep joy and renewed hope that their dearest longing is not
a fiction but a Divine reality that awaits them.
"Conjugial
love is in the same measure a conjunction of minds, and the conjunction remains during the
bodily life of the one after the passing of the other. This conjunction holds any
inclination to remarry in balance as though in a scale, and tips the scale its way to the
degree that true love has been embraced" (CL 318). |
3. Feminizing
the Marriage is Sanctifying It
Date: Wed, 27 Jun
2001
From: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu
Subject: Re: Feminization of the Church When I read Dr. Bell's article (NCL, May 2001) I had this reaction
regarding the "feminization of the Church" idea. The fact that more women attend
Church than men do, or that men are leaving the Church while women are staying, is taken
as evidence that the Church has been feminized and doesn't serve men's spiritual needs. I
think this is a leap of fantasy and is made within a biased scope against women. I had
this bias against women, just about all men have this anti-feminine bias from up bringing.
It has been socialized into us men that we are superior to women.
I have had to work hard against myself,
with the courageous aid of my wife, for many years, to rid myself of this anti-conjugial
idea we men receive from our culture and family. Mothers too conspire in this for they are
the ones who raise the boys, along with the fathers, of course. But mothers have also come
to believe in the superiority of men. Girls are brought up that way and consume the same
cultural attitudes expressed in the mass media. In other countries this is even more
explicit and gross, with the result of the horrible abuse of women, to the shame of the
men who lead and govern those countries.
As long as men lord it over women,
explicitly or subtly, they cannot enter into a relationship of unity with their wife. Thus
they cannot have conjugial love. They cannot regenerate. They are going to hell. I was on
that road, drawn inevitably, like a ship is drawn by a current. The Lord weeps and works
ceaselessly to convince us we should stop. He tells us in the Writings that a wife is
given to each man by Him to cure the man from his madness, his arrogance. So arrogant that
men will not go to Church as a way of affirming their pure arrogance. They say with the
mouth I believe, with the heart they deny. How utterly sad. And yet the Good News is that
we men can change, if we cooperate with the Lord. For me, this cooperation process is
explained as the Doctrine of the Wife (which was mentioned here before).
This doctrine says that our wife is the
love of our wisdom, not us. When we love our wisdom, we are in hell. To get out of hell we
must cease to love our own wisdom above the wisdom of the wife whom the Lord gave us to
save ourselves from hell. This is the Doctrine of the Wife. Her judgment must be elevated
in our mind above our judgment. This I endeavor to practice in my life, and to the extent
that I'm sincere, to that extent I succeed in evolving into a conjugial husband. There is
no other way in achieving internal unity between husband and wife. This is the only way
because conjugial unition is a process of spiritual biology.
The idea in the Doctrine of the Wife is
resisted by men. Men will go as far as saying, OK, let's have equality instead of men's
superiority. This is Satan's subterfuge! I used it too. But equality is necessary, of
course--for the outside world. Women should have equal rights to men and vice versa when
it comes to law, custom, and image or status. This is just a matter of human decency. But
to achieve conjugial union, the unition process between woman and man must also go on in
the internal mind. To carry over the idea of equality in the internal mind is to resist
conjugial love, to stop regeneration, to go to hell.
In the internal mind there is no
equality between husband and wife, but unity. And unity occurs between reciprocal parts,
that is, between the husband's cognitive mind ("wisdom") and the woman's
affective mind ("love of the husband's wisdom"). Unition must be across the two
sexes so that the male supplies the cognitive and the female supplies the affective. Now a
new biological entity is born--the conjugial couple, called one Angel in the Writings.
This one Angel is biologically formed in only one way.
In every day interactions between a
husband and his wife the husband acts like he's got the right to argue with his wife who
wants one thing while he wants another thing. This happens with any regular topic--kids,
furniture, wall color, visits, attendance, money, gifts, whatever...The husband stands his
ground and has all sorts of "reasons" he presents to his wife why he is right. I
have done this for many years. I continued to do this despite my studious daily study of
the Writings and my pious attitudes expressed in sermonizing and lecturing my students and
neighbors. But after my wife's brave and furious and tireless persistence, the Lord bless
her mind, I switched in orientation. I formulated the Doctrine of the Wife to remind
myself about the Scriptural Commandment that I put my male judgment below my wife's female
judgment. Just as the Lord commanded Abraham "Hearken unto Sarah."
It works. It is false to say that the
Doctrine of the Wife will "feminize the Church" or that men will leave the
Church on account of it. It is false to say that the Doctrine of the Wife gives women
superiority or dominion, which is infernal. Dominion of a wife over her husband is just as
infernal as the current male-dominated social norms. So no use pretending that the
Doctrine of the Wife advocates male inferiority, or female superiority, because of the
idea that a husband should put his judgment below the wife's. A husband who sincerely
wants conjugial love, LOVES the idea of him voluntarily putting his judgment below his
wife's judgment. He loves that idea because he experiences in that idea the feeling of
internal unity, and this is something we can love indeed, once we have a taste of it.
Imagine: we men deny ourselves this
exquisite and ecstatic experience. We prefer the arrogant idea of internal equality of the
sexes. This is a political requirement, thus for the body and the external mind. All
married couples start out in this state, which is called "conjugal" (not
conjugial). We can make a great show of friendship and mutual liking in this external
conjunction of minds------and then, suddenly one day, the cruel announcement, I hate your
guts I want out I love someone else. A little over fifty percent of the marriages end this
way, and the rest do not because of the ceaseless loyalty and sweetness of the wives.
I hope the men who read this re-read it
after cooling down and begging the Lord to give them enlightenment. This I do myself
continuously, for I'm not finished by a long shot. The Lord pleads with us, O Why will yea
die, my people. Choose life, and life is conjugial love, and conjugial love is internal
unition, and internal unition is the man's understanding united to the wife's will, and
the will directs, guides, judges, perceives.
Aloha and Peace,
Leon James |
The expression "feminization of the
Church" is usually taken in a pejorative sense. We need to reclaim this word in its
good sense, and this is done through the Doctrine of the Wife. Through this perspective
marriage becomes feminized in the mind of husbands. When this occurs, the feminization of
marriage has taken place, and this is synonymous with the sanctification of marriage.
Marriage is sanctified by the husband in his internal mind
when he acknowledges, confirms, and lives in accordance with the Doctrine of the Wife.
Marriage is the state of growth between a wife and a husband. There are two phases to this
growth, external and internal, or, growth in the external mind and growth in the internal
mind. In the external mind, marriage is masculinized and in society this is equivalent
with the notion that this is a 'man's world.' But in the internal phase which comes next,
marriage is feminized by the husband through living the Doctrine of the Wife.
The commandment for husbands to
"leave mother and father" means to abandon loyalty and love for masculinized
truth, and the commandment to "cleave unto the wife" means to conjoin himself in
all things with the wife's affections. In this way they achieve the state of "one
flesh" which means of one mind, which is the mind of an angel. This is composed of
the wife's affections conjoined with the husband's cognitions, thus making one angelic
mind out of a man and a woman. This conjoined mind is the highest state provided by the
Lord for humans and in this state we are truly human, immortal and in perfect health,
ecstatically happy, fully rational, loving and compassionate, creative and skillful to the
extreme in all things. This is the angelic state, and it is created when the husband loves
his wife's affections and adjusts his own cognitions to harmonize with the wife's
affections. This is his striving in feminizing the marriage and which the Lord rewards by
creating the perfect angelic mind out of the two imperfect individuals.
The idea that the feminization of
marriage is its sanctification may appear surprising at first. Even more surprise is
generated if we say that the feminization of the Church is its true
and genuine sanctification. We can say in general that the feminization of society
is its salvation, and universally we can say that the feminization of the universe is
God's plan in creation. You can confirm this principle from many things written in the
Writings. Let me mention just a few examples.
Divine Truth of the highest kind is
represented by Sarah, Wives, Virgins, and so on. Divine Truth of the lower kind is
represented by men, boys, kings, and so on. The Church and the Word is also
represented by women, maidens, brides, and so on. The Word describes women's intelligence
as being like the Lord's intelligence--"modest, gracious, peaceable, compliant, soft
and gentle," but the intelligence of men is described as "critical, rough,
resistant, argumentative, and given to intemperance" (see(CL 218). A
man is constructed biologically as the inverse of a woman since woman is interior truth
covered over with love while man is love covered over with exterior truth. The Writings
also teach that interior is always superior and more spiritual than exterior in all
things. Clearly then, a woman's intelligence is more spiritual and celestial than a man's
intelligence. But we know that the Lord's purpose in creating and maintaining the universe
is to populate the heavens from individuals born on earths. The heavens vary in accordance
with genius, that is, distance from the Lord's Mind or Proprium--which is His Character
and Personality. Regeneration consists in loosing our own proprium and living as if from
the Lord's Proprium. This means abandoning the external masculinized truth and entering
existence into the internal feminized truth. The feminized truth is like the truth of the
Lord's Own Proprium which we are to take on and in which we are to live. Our affections as
husbands must be placed below the affections of our wife because her intelligence is
higher than our intelligence and this higher intelligence can conjoin only with feminine
affections, not masculine.
From
Swedenborg's Conjugial Love (CL 187) "Changes of state are of one kind with men and of another with
women, because, by creation, men are forms of science, intelligence, and wisdom, and
women, forms of the love of these with men."
Additional passages such as this are
quoted a few screens below. (Go there now.) |
Passages such as the above are seized
upon by our external masculinized mind which wants to hold on to the idea that
intelligence is the arena of men while feelings is the arena of women. By this they mean
that men are ahead of women in intelligence and wisdom while women are ahead of men in
love and affection. In this way they mean to turn the Doctrine of the Wife upside down and
make it into a non-genuine union made by man, not by the Lord. The union the man wants to
make is the adjunction together of man's intelligence with woman's affectional
predisposition. This is not a true marriage and adjunction does not constitute
conjunction. The passage above, and all others like it, refer to EXTERNAL states of
marriage. Internal states are the reverse, as you can see in this passage.
From
Swedenborg's Conjugial Love (CL 32) "(a)The difference essentially consists in this, that the inmost
quality in masculinity is love, and its veil wisdom, or in other words, it is love veiled
over with wisdom, while the inmost quality in femininity is that same wisdom, the wisdom
of masculinity, and its veil the love resulting from it. (b) This second love, however, is
a feminine love, and it is given by the Lord to a wife through the wisdom of her husband,
whereas that first love is a masculine love, which is a love of becoming wise, and it is
given by the Lord to a husband according to his reception of wisdom. (c) Consequently, the
male is a form of the wisdom of love, and the female is a form of the love of that wisdom.
(d) Therefore from creation there was implanted in both male and female a love of uniting
into one. " |
This passage has four sentences which I
marked from (a) to (d) in order to consider them each in turn. Sentence (a) specifies the
"essential" or inmost difference between man and woman. Note that this inmost
difference constitutes a union. No union is possible between alike and alike for that
yields only an external adjunction or co-location. Note that in order to create a
structural union there must be a particular kind of difference or relation, one that
functions as a unitary action like the heart and the lungs in the body. Sentence (a)
specifies the structural relation in marriage: femininity consists in elevating masculine
wisdom from external to internal, or, from natural-rational to spiritual-rational. A wife
imbibes and appropriates her husband's wisdom and then elevates it, that is, makes it
interior, and covers it over with feminine love. This is stated in sentence (b).
Note this very important observation: In
sentence (b) it is said that the Lord gives the wife conjugial love "through the
wisdom of her husband." There are two ways of interpreting the meaning. One is that
the wisdom mentioned here is the wisdom of the husband such as it is in the husband. But
this is not in accord with the Doctrine of the Wife and its rationale. The other possible
meaning is that the wisdom of the husband mentioned here refers to the wisdom of the
husband the wife has when she imbibes her husband's wisdom. This means that the wife has
conjugial love from the Lord when she unites her current wisdom in her (originally from
the husband) with harmonious affections also in her, within which is the love from the
Lord.
In this second interpretation it is
clear that the wife's intelligence and wisdom is more interior than his, even though her
wisdom originates from his. But it is given to the wife to elevate that wisdom from the
husband within herself by implanting it in her inner mind where it functions at a more
interior level than with the husband where it originated from. This interior truth is
represented by Sarah, Abraham's wife. It is celestial truth and is such as the highest
angels have. Angelic unity of the married couple thus depends on the husband imbibing the
wife's affections and the wife imbibing the husband's cognitions. This process changes the
cognitions of the husband and the wife as a gradual and endless process of deeper and
richer union. This is not a static process. When the husband imbibes the wife's
affections, his cognitions must change accordingly. He gains a deeper wisdom than before.
When a wife imbibes her husband's cognitions, her affections become more sublime as
indicated by greater beauty and more glorious femininity. The more they love each other's
reciprocity, the more they conjoin in deeper unity. And this to eternity. What an amazing
and wonderful reality! This is indicated in sentence (d).
Sentence (b) also states that the Lord
gives the husband wisdom according to his "reception" of wisdom. What is the
measure of his reception? Not his knowledge and intelligence, but the life he conducts
according to these. Which means the kind of affections he favors. The Lord is instructing
us that if we husbands favor the affections of our wife, then it means that we are
receptive of His wisdom. Then He can give us that wisdom, and more of it. We become more
wise as a husband only by living what we know, and this means doing the work of charity,
starting especially with the wife, who is the neighbor in the first place, before all
other neighbors. By loving the affections of our wife, affections which she has from the
Lord, we are living what we know and understand from the Word. We are then receptive to
the Lord's wisdom. As we receive deeper wisdom from the Lord, our wife imbibes it,
elevates it in her interior mind, and receives new deeper and more genuine conjugial love
from the Lord. The husband now can imbibe her new affections--and the cycle of union
continues to grow forever.
To imbibe the wife's affections and to
favor them means that the husband must never disagree and always agree with his wife's
requests in all things.
See also
The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband
4. Heresies
Regarding the Husband's Wisdom
The Writings
of Swedenborg (1688-1771) contain the greatest scientific revelations ever made to
humankind. The center of these revelations is that human emotions and feelings are
arranged in a hierarchy from strongest to weakest, and the strongest at the very top is
the intense desire to unite in marriage. This state of inner unition between a husband and
a wife is the complete and pure human state of life. It is the angelic life of couplehood.
This is the life Swedenborg witnessed with thousands of couples with whom he interacted in
the spiritual world called the heavens. The married couple is organically united in their
spirit body or mind exactly like newly born Siamese twins who are physically joined in the
body. The mental state of unition is so real in the afterlife world that married partners
appear as one angel from a distance, but then appear as husband and wife when approached
by Swedenborg. Without knowing this reality, an inner union between husband and wife
cannot be achieved on a conscious basis. Perhaps it can happen at the unconscious level, I
don't know. But now look at this:
From Swedenborg's
Conjugial
Love
168. (10)
This perception is a wisdom that the wife has. A man is not capable of it, neither is a
wife capable of her husband's intellectual wisdom. This follows from the difference that
exists between masculinity and femininity. It is masculine to perceive from the intellect,
and feminine to perceive from love. Moreover, the intellect also perceives those sorts of
matters which transcend the body and the world - it being the nature of intellectual and
spiritual sight to move in that direction - while love does not perceive beyond what it
feels. When it does, its perception draws on its union with the intellect of a man, a
union established from creation. For the intellect has to do with light, and love with
warmth, and concerns that are matters of light are seen, whereas concerns that are matters
of warmth are felt. It is apparent from this that, because of the universal difference
which exists between masculinity and femininity, a husband is not capable of his wife's
wisdom, nor is a wife capable of her husband's wisdom. Women are not even capable of a
man's moral wisdom to the extent that it springs from his intellectual wisdom.
174. (16) A husband has duties
appropriate to him, and a wife duties appropriate to her, and a wife cannot enter into
duties appropriate to her husband or a husband into duties appropriate to his wife and
perform them properly. There is no need to illustrate by recounting them that there are
duties appropriate to a husband and duties appropriate to a wife, for these are many and
various in nature. Moreover, everyone knows how to divide them into their categories
according to their general and specific kinds, provided he directs his mind to seeing the
difference between them. Duties by which wives especially unite themselves with their
husbands are duties involved in the upbringing of little children of both sexes, and of
girls to the age when they are given in marriage.
175 [2] Many people believe that women
can perform the duties of men if only they are introduced into them from early age in the
way that boys are. However, women can be introduced into the exercise of these duties, but
not into the judgment on which the proper performance of these duties inwardly depends.
Therefore, those women who are introduced into the duties of men, in matters of judgment
are bound to go to men for advice; and then, from the men's recommendations, if they are
their own mistresses, they choose what accords with their love. [3] Some people also
suppose that women can raise the sight of their understanding into the same realm of light
that men can and see things on the same high level. They have been persuaded of this
opinion by what some educated female poets have written. But when the works of these
female poets were examined in their presence in the spiritual world, they were found to be
works, not of judgment and wisdom, but of cleverness and a facility in the use of
language. And works which result from these two gifts, because of the elegance and skill
in the way the words are put together, appear as though they were lofty and intelligent -
but only to people who take any kind of cleverness and call it wisdom. [4] We also say
that men cannot enter into duties appropriate to women and perform them properly, because
they cannot enter into the affections of women, which are completely different from the
affections of men. Since the affections and perceptions of the male sex, from creation and
thus by nature, have been made so different, therefore the laws among the children of
Israel also included the following decree:
A woman shall not have on the garment of
a man, nor a man the garment of a woman, for it is an abomination.... (Deuteronomy 22:5)
177. (18) According as the
aforementioned conjunctions are formed, married partners become more and more one person.
This accords with the observations contained in point (6), where we explained that the
union takes place gradually from the first days of marriage, and that in people who are in
a state of truly conjugial love, it becomes deeper and deeper to eternity. See what was
said there. Married partners become proportionately one person in the measure that their
conjugial love grows. And because, in heaven, this love is genuine, owing to the celestial
and spiritual life of the angels, therefore two married partners there are called two when
they are referred to as husband and wife, but one when they are referred to as angels.
|
The above passages clearly show that a
union is necessary for the husband to be whole, or for the wife to be whole. The two are
singly incomplete, the man lacking the love his understanding needs to be whole, and the
wife lacking the understanding her love needs. There is a temptation
for husbands to read the above passage and conclude that men are superior to women in
understanding the things of everyday life. This I call a doctrinal heresy and the
husband must let go of this persuasion, or fail in his attempt to regenerate and become an
angel. (See this
article for heresies in the New Church)
A sermon by Rev. Geoffrey H. Howard
titled "The Transformation of a Man into a Husband and a Woman into a Wife through
Marriage" appeared in New Church Life, June 2001 issue, pages 243-248. I will use
this sermon to illustrate some doctrinal issues in relation to the Doctrine of the Wife.
The point I wish to make is that the literal of the Writings can lead to misconceptions
unless contextualized in relation to the Doctrine of the Wife. In other words,
articulating the Doctrine of the Wife and applying it to interpret the literal of the
Writings avoids the heresy of believing that men are superior to women due to men's wisdom
which women cannot have. I believe that this heresy cannot be avoided without the Doctrine
of the Wife.
First I note that it is customary to
make a statement of denial in relation to the heresy of the superiority of men over women
in relation to wisdom. For instance, Rev. Howard states: "It is important to take
teachings such as these in their proper context. Some have read into such teachings in
Conjugial Love the erroneous notion that masculine virtues are extolled over those of the
feminine. Nothing could be further from the truth" (p.244). Nevertheless, this denial
appears perfunctory or a mere outward declaration when we examine how this apparent
paradox is to be resolved. The apparent paradox is that portions of the literal of the
Writings appear to suggest that men are superior to women with respect to wisdom. Rev.
Howard refers to some of these, e.g.:
From Swedenborg's
Conjugial
Love
32. (2) A
male is then still a male, and a female still a female. Since a person lives as a person
after death, and people are male and female, and since it is one thing to be masculine and
another to be feminine, with the two qualities being so different that one cannot be
converted into the other, it follows that after death a male still lives as a male and a
female still lives as a female, each of them being a spiritual person.
We say that masculinity cannot be
converted into femininity, nor femininity into masculinity, and that after death a male is
consequently still a male, and a female still a female. But because people do not know
what masculinity consists in essentially, and what femininity consists in essentially,
therefore we must say a few words about it here.
The difference essentially consists in
this, that the inmost quality in masculinity is love, and its veil wisdom, or in other
words, it is love veiled over with wisdom, while the inmost quality in femininity is that
same wisdom, the wisdom of masculinity, and its veil the love resulting from it. This
second love, however, is a feminine love, and it is given by the Lord to a wife through
the wisdom of her husband, whereas that first love is a masculine love, which is a love of
becoming wise, and it is given by the Lord to a husband according to his reception of
wisdom. Consequently, the male is a form of the wisdom of love, and the female is a form
of the love of that wisdom. Therefore from creation there was implanted in both male and
female a love of uniting into one. But more on this subject will be said later.
Testimony that femininity is derived
from masculinity, or that woman was taken out of man, appears from these verses in
Genesis:
Jehovah God...took one of the ribs of
the man, and closed up the flesh in its place. And the rib which He had taken from man He
fashioned into a woman, and He brought her to the man. And the man said: "She is bone
of my bones and flesh of my flesh. Therefore she shall be called Woman, because she was
taken out of Man." (Genesis 2:21-23) |
Rev. Howard concludes: "From this
we can see that the reception of masculine wisdom depends upon a man's willingness to look
to the Lord and shun as sins against the Lord the evils that may tempt him. Thus we can
see that a man does not automatically receive wisdom because he is a male. He receives it
only by honoring the Lord through living according to His commandments."
This is true. But we need to look at
this closely for a serpent may lie hidden under it, like a rock in the desert. We must
inquire into this and make it clear: How does a man live according to the Lord's
commandments? One might think at first blush that the man has that power from the Lord
independently of his wife. Can a husband live according to the
Lord's commandments from his efforts apart from the wife or only through his wife? Could
it be that the husband cannot follow the Lord's commandments unless he does so through his
wife? This would appear to be so when considering Rev. Howard's description of the
wife: "A woman too is born with the potential for receiving wisdom, but in her
case the wisdom she receives partakes more of love and of perception. She is gifted with
the potential of elevating her will into the heat of heaven above what is possible with
men" (p.245).
From Swedenborg's
Conjugial
Love
168. (10)
This perception is a wisdom that the wife has. A man is not capable of it, neither is a
wife capable of her husband's intellectual wisdom. This follows from the difference that
exists between masculinity and femininity. It is masculine to perceive from the intellect,
and feminine to perceive from love. Moreover, the intellect also perceives those sorts of
matters which transcend the body and the world - it being the nature of intellectual and
spiritual sight to move in that direction - while love does not perceive beyond what it
feels. When it does, its perception draws on its union with the intellect of a man, a
union established from creation. For the intellect has to do with light, and love with
warmth, and concerns that are matters of light are seen, whereas concerns that are matters
of warmth are felt.
It is apparent from this that, because
of the universal difference which exists between masculinity and femininity, a husband is
not capable of his wife's wisdom, nor is a wife capable of her husband's wisdom. Women are
not even capable of a man's moral wisdom to the extent that it springs from his
intellectual wisdom. |
Rev. Howard: "Feminine wisdom, or
perception, does not easily lend itself to description because it is of a more interior
nature than is the wisdom given to a man" (...) They are entirely different in
quality and nature, yet complementary to each other" (p.245).
This is true, and yet there is a
temptation hidden in it. It seems to me that it is not enough to say (a) that masculine
and feminine wisdom are different; and (b) that they are complementary. This is not
enough. A conclusion must follow: (c) Therefore the husband should
elevate the wife's judgment above his own. This is the Doctrine of the Wife.
Without this conclusion, the literal of
the Writings is misperceived. The husband's wisdom may indeed be elevated even to the
highest heaven, but he cannot appropriate it to himself. His wisdom falls back quickly to
the level of his affections, which are in hell. The Writings make this comparison:
"He is also like an adulterer who hides a harlot in a room below, and in turn ascends
to the highest story of his house, and there in the presence of his wife talks wisely with
visitors about chastity, and again steals away from the company and satiates his lust with
the harlot below" (TCR 590). This comparison is said about every husband. Husbands
can elevate their intellect into doctrinal things of the Word while they are studying and
applying themselves piously. Then they descend from the lofty heights and interact with
their wife, abusing them, discounting their intellect, holding the wife's judgment as
nothing in comparison to their own. And this is done repeatedly, daily. Thus there is no
regeneration possible for them.
Rev. Howard: "No wife can love a
proud or conceited husband. (...) The attraction he feels [as he is drawn to her by love]
has the effect of subduing his proprial pride. (...) Through the influence of her love his
mind becomes elevated and aspires to a new idealism that no longer looks inward. He feels
an incentive to live in a manner worthy of her love and respect. Through her influence he
is withdrawn from his fallen proprium. By living a principled life of service to his wife,
family and others, he begins to receive a degree of wisdom which will draw the affections
of his wife" (p.247).
This is certainly true. And yet there is
danger lurking in this truth that needs to be addressed by every husband. The above
description is standard fair for what is called BROWN
temptations (see part 2). Note what the paragraph says: the husband aspires to a new
idealism as he strives to become worthy of her love and respect. Through this process he
enlarges or deepens his wisdom, and this will draw his wife's affections to him. And then
he can continue a new round, ever higher or deeper into conjugial love and unity. To me
this seems to leave the main point unattended, which is that husbands CANNOT improve their
wisdom through this process of self-motivated desire to be worthy of their wife's still
greater love. This is not possible, no more than the proverbial lifting yourself through
the boot straps.
The only way a
husband can improve his wisdom is by elevating his wife's judgment above his own. This is
the Doctrine of the Wife. Clearly the wife's wisdom is higher and superior to the
husband's wisdom. This is not recognized by Rev. Howard, as can be seen from
this: "A husband is totally dependent upon the wife for love. Apart from
feminine love, men feel little inspiration to seek things of wisdom." This is another
standard version of BROWN temptations, described in Part 2.
In this mental state wives are relegated to a ceremonious role, yes an essential role it
is declared, but still not a central role, still not a PRIMARY role. This is refused by
the husband. The husband will acknowledge that the wife has an essential role to play in
the union. And this role is relegated to the "affectional side" of things. Here,
Rev. Howard says "dependent on the wife for love" and "inspired by the wife
to new heights of wisdom" etc. The central fact remains: It is believed that the
husband improves and grows in his wisdom from the Lord in accordance with his
"following the commandments."
It is believed that if the husband
applies himself to following the commandments, his wisdom will grow from the Lord, and the
wife will be able to love his wisdom even more, and thus the couple is conjoined. But this
is the WRONG order! It is NOT the case that the husband gains wisdom implanted from the
Lord BY HIMSELF, that is, apart from his wife, through his own independent effort and
striving to follow the Lord's commandments. This is a FANTASY as I have discovered.
There is only one way the husband can
grow in wisdom, and that is through receiving it from the Lord. True. But the Lord can
only give as much as the husband can receive--this is recognized by everyone. Hence the
question is: When can the husband receive more interior truths or deeper wisdom from the
Lord? NOT as he strives independently to follow the Lord's commandments and receiving
deeper wisdom which she can then love and conjoin with. There is no deeper wisdom for her
to conjoin with just because the husband strives to improve by following the commandments.
Striving to improve is not sufficient for the husband to receive more interior truths from
the Lord. Why? Because this striving is from his proprium.
His only salvation is to love the wife's judgment above his own, to love
the wife's wisdom above his own. This is the Doctrine of the Wife.
Finally, Rev. Howard writes:
"Rational wisdom, on the other hand, is gained through study and application to
intellectual pursuits. These have the effect of elevating the mind of a husband into
higher light" (p.248).
I have discovered that rational wisdom
does not develop in this way because such study and scholarship only yields knowledges and
scientifics about the literal of the Word. Instead, rational wisdom develops as the
husband DRAWS OUT or EXTRACTS doctrine from the literal through enlightenment or
illustration from the Lord (see this article on
De Hemelsche Leer). It is shown in the article that this illustration is proportional
to the husband's willingness to undergo spiritual and celestial temptations. These temptations cannot be undergone by the husband alone, but only
through the wife, and only to the extent that one favors the wife's wisdom over one's own.
This doesn't mean that the wife knows more than the husband about doctrinal things
and so the husband takes lessons from the wife. It means that whatever doctrine the
husband can extract from the literal, his understanding of it, and then his life according
to it, is proportional to his seeing the doctrine in himself, in his
life. This is the essence of illustration. For a husband, his wife is the all in
all of his temptations, hence of his regeneration and salvation.
The Doctrine of the Wife explains many
things about marriage taken from the Writings of Swedenborg.
From Swedenborg's
Heaven
and Hell
HH 369.
Everyone, man or woman, enjoys understanding and will; but with the man the understanding
predominates, and with the woman the will predominates, and the character is determined by
that which predominates. Yet in marriages in the heavens there is no
predominance; for the will of the wife is also the husband's will, and the understanding
of the husband is also the wife's understanding, since each loves to will and think as the
other, that is, mutually and reciprocally. Thus are they conjoined into one. This
is actual conjunction, for the will of the wife enters into the understanding of the
husband, and the understanding of the husband into the will of the wife, and this
especially when they look into one another's faces . . . . From all this it can be
established what the conjunction of minds is that makes marriage and produces conjugial
love in the heavens, namely, that one wishes what is his own to be the other's, and this
reciprocally. |
5. The
Role of the Wife in the Husband's Wisdom
From Swedenborg's
Conjugial
Love
293.
To
this I will append two narrative accounts. Here is the first:
I once looked out my window toward the
east and saw seven women sitting next to a rose garden by a spring drinking water. I
strained my eyes intently to see what they were doing, and the intensity of my gaze caught
their attention. With a motion of the head one of them therefore invited me over.
Accordingly I left the house and hurried in their direction. And when I arrived, I
politely asked them where they were from.
They then said, "We are wives. We
are talking here about the delights of conjugial love, and we have concluded from a good
deal of evidence that these delights are also delights of wisdom."
This response so delighted my heart that
I seemed to be more interiorly in the spirit and to have on that account a more
enlightened perception than ever before. So I said to them, "Permit me an opportunity
to ask you some questions about those pleasant delights." And they nodded their
assent.
So I asked, "How do you wives know
that the delights of conjugial love are at the same time delights of wisdom?"
[2] They then replied, "We know it
from the correspondence that exists between wisdom in our husbands and the delights of
conjugial love in us. For the delights of this love in us heighten or diminish and take on
altogether different qualities according to the wisdom in our husbands."
On hearing this I inquired further,
saying, "I know you are affected by gentle words from your husbands and cheerful
states of mind on their part, and that you take delight on account of these with all your
heart. But I wonder at your saying that it is in response to their wisdom. However, tell
me what wisdom is and what sort of wisdom you mean."
[3] To this the wives replied with
annoyance, "You think we do not know what wisdom is and what sort of wisdom we mean,
even though we continually reflect on it in our husbands and daily learn it from their
mouths. Indeed, we wives think about the state of our husbands from morning to evening,
with scarcely any time intervening in a day when this is interrupted or in which our
instinctive thought is entirely withdrawn or gone from them. Our husbands in contrast
spend very little time in the course of a day thinking about our state. As a result we
know what sort of wisdom in them finds delight in us. Our husbands call this wisdom a
spiritual-rational wisdom and a spiritual-moral one. Spiritual-rational wisdom, they say,
is a matter of the intellect and its intellectual concepts, while spiritual-moral wisdom
is a matter of the will and its mode of life. Yet they join the two together and regard
them as one; and they maintain that the pleasant delights of this wisdom are transposed
from their minds into delights in our hearts, and from our hearts back to their hearts, so
that these return to the wisdom from which they originated."
[4] I then asked whether they knew
anything more about this wisdom in their husbands - "wisdom," I said,
"which finds delight in you."
"We do," they said. "It
is a spiritual wisdom, and from that a rational and moral one. Spiritual wisdom is to
acknowledge the Lord our Savior as God of heaven and earth, and through the Word and
discourses from it to acquire from Him truths connected with the Church, from which comes
a spiritual rationality; and in addition to live from Him according to those truths, from
which comes a spiritual morality. Our husbands call these two the wisdom which in general
works to produce truly conjugial love. We have also heard from them the reason, namely,
that this wisdom opens the inner faculties of their mind and thus of their body, providing
free passage from the firsts to the last of these for the stream of love, on whose flow,
sufficiency and strength conjugial love depends for its existence and life.
"As regards marriage in particular,
the spiritual-rational and spiritual-moral wisdom of our husbands has as its end and goal
to love only their wives and to rid themselves of all desire for other women. Moreover, to
the extent they achieve this, to that extent that love is heightened in degree and
perfected in quality, and the more clearly and keenly do we then feel matching delights in
us corresponding to the contented pleasures of our husbands' affections and the pleasant
exaltations of their thoughts."
[5] I asked them next whether they knew
how the communication took place.
They said, "All conjunction by love
requires action, reception, and reaction. The state of our love and its delights is the
agent or that which acts. The state of our husbands' wisdom is the recipient or that which
receives. And this same wisdom is also the reagent or that which reacts in accordance with
their reception. This reaction is then perceived by us with feelings of delight in our
hearts according to our state and the measure in which it is continually open and ready to
receive those elements which in some way are connected with and so emanate from virtue in
our husbands, thus which in some way are connected with and so emanate from the final
state of love in us."
At that point they also inserted,
"Take care you do not interpret the delights we have mentioned to mean the end
delights of conjugial love. We never talk about these, but only about the delights of our
hearts which constantly correspond to the state of wisdom in our husbands."
[6] After that there appeared in the
distance what looked like a dove in flight with a leaf from a tree in its mouth; but as it
drew near, instead of a dove we saw a little boy with a piece of paper in his hand. Coming
over to us then, he held it out to me and said, "Read it in the presence of these
maidens of the spring."
So I read the following:
Tell the inhabitants of the earth among
whom you live that there is such a thing as truly conjugial love, offering a million
delights scarcely any of which are yet known to the world. But they will be discovered
when the church betroths itself to her Lord and becomes His bride and wife.
Then I asked the wives, "Why did
the boy call you 'maidens of the spring'?"
"We are called maidens when we sit
by this spring," they replied, "because we are forms of affection for the truths
of our husbands' wisdom; and an affection for truth in form is termed a maiden. The spring
likewise symbolizes the truth of wisdom, and the rose garden we are sitting next to its
delights."
[7] One of the seven wives then wove a
garland of roses; and sprinkling it with water from the spring, she placed it over the cap
the boy had on, fitting it around his little head and saying, "Receive the delights
of intelligence. Your cap, you see, symbolizes intelligence, and the garland from this
rose garden its delights."
Thus adorned the boy then departed, and
in the distance he looked once more like a dove in flight, but this time with a little
crown on its head.
294.
The second account:
Several days later I again saw the same
seven wives in a rose garden, but in a different one from the one previously. It was a
magnificent garden, the like of which I had never seen before. It was laid out almost in a
circle, and the roses in it formed a kind of rainbow-like arc. Purple-colored roses or
flowers formed its outmost ring; golden-yellow ones the next ring in; dark-blue ones the
ring inside that; and bluish-green or bright-green ones the inmost ring. And enclosed
within that rainbow-like rose garden was a little pool of clear water.
Those seven wives, previously called
maidens of the spring, were sitting there, and seeing me at my window they again called me
over. Then, when I arrived, they said, "Have you ever seen anything more beautiful on
earth?"
"Never," I said.
So they said, "A marvel like this
is created by the Lord in instant, and it represents a new development on earth, for
everything created by the Lord represents something. But divine if you can what that is.
We are guessing that it is the delights of conjugial love."
[2] On hearing this I said, "What
are the delights of conjugial love, of which you spoke with so much wisdom and also so
much eloquence last time? After I left you, I related what you said to wives living in our
world, and I told them, 'Having now been instructed, I know that you feel delights in your
hearts arising from your conjugial love, which you are able to communicate to your
husbands in accordance with their wisdom. I also know that from morning to evening you
therefore continually contemplate your husbands with the eyes of your spirit and consider
how to turn and guide their hearts to becoming wise, in order that you may realize those
delights.' I further reported what you meant by wisdom, saying that it is a
spiritual-rational and spiritual-moral wisdom, and that as regards marriage it is to love
only one's wife and to rid oneself of all desire for other women.
"But to this the wives in our world
responded with laughter, saying, 'What are you talking about? What you have said is
preposterous. We do not know what conjugial love is. If our husbands experience anything
of it, still we do not. How then do its delights originate with us? Indeed, when it comes
to the delights which you call the end delights, we sometimes resist vehemently, for to us
they are repugnant, in almost the same way as acts of rape. In fact, if you look, you will
not see one sign of any such love in our faces. Therefore you are either talking nonsense
or joking if, like those seven wives of yours, you too say that we think about our
husbands from morning to evening and continually give attention to their wishes and
pleasures, in order that we may gain from them delights such as those!'
"I have retained from the responses
of those wives these declarations, to report them to you, since they call into dispute and
even more entirely contradict the discourse I heard from you by the spring, which I
listened to so eagerly and also believed."
[3] To this the wives sitting in the
rose garden replied, "Dear friend, you do not know the wisdom and prudence of wives,
because they hide it altogether from men and keep it hidden precisely in order to be loved
by them. For every man who is not spiritually rational and moral but only naturally so
possesses a coldness towards his wife, such a coldness being inherent in him in his inmost
elements. This coldness a wise and prudent wife acutely and keenly notices, and she then
conceals her conjugial love, withdrawing into her heart so much of it and hiding it there
so deeply that not the least bit of it appears in her face, her tone of voice, or gesture.
She does this, because to the extent her love appears, to that extent a man's coldness
with respect to marriage pours forth from the inmost elements of his mind where it resides
and descends into its outmost expressions, producing a total frigidity in the body and an
urge to separate himself therefore from the bed and bedroom."
[4] I asked them then, "What causes
such coldness, which you call coldness with respect to marriage."
"It comes from a lack of
rationality on their part in matters of the spirit. Every man who is irrational in matters
of the spirit is inmostly cold to his wife and inmostly warm toward harlots. And because
conjugial love and licentious love are opposed to each other, it follows that conjugial
love becomes cold whenever licentious love is warm. Then, when coldness reigns in a man,
he cannot endure any feeling of love or even therefore any whisper of it from his wife.
That is why a wife so wisely and prudently conceals it; and to the extent she does this by
denying and resisting, to that extent a wanton atmosphere flows in which revives and
restores the man's interest. As a result the wife of a man like that does not experience
any delights of the heart such as we do, but only physical gratifications, which on the
man's part have to be termed pleasures of insanity, because they are the pleasures of a
licentious love.
[5] "Every chaste wife loves her
husband, even a husband who is unchaste; but because wisdom is the only quality that
receives her love, therefore a wife spends every effort to turn his insanity into wisdom,
at least to the point that he does not desire any other women but her. This she
accomplishes in a thousand ways, taking especial care that none of these ways be detected
by her husband; for she well knows that love cannot be compelled, but is subtly infused in
a state of freedom. For that reason it is granted to women to discern from sight, hearing
and touch their husbands' every state of mind, while it is not granted to men conversely
to discern any of their wives' states of mind.
[6] "A chaste wife can look at her
husband with a stern expression, speak to him in a sharp voice, and even be angry at him
and fight with him, and yet at the same time in her heart cherish a gentle and tender love
for him. The object, however, of these expressions of anger and concealments of love is
wisdom and a consequent reception of love on the part of her husband, as is clearly
apparent from how quickly she can be placated. Wives furthermore have such ways of
concealing the love implanted in their heart and marrows in order by these means to keep a
man's coldness with respect to marriage from breaking out in him and extinguishing even
the fire of his licentious heat, the result of which would be to turn him from green wood
into a dry stick."
[7] After those seven wives made these
statements and a number of others like them, their husbands came with clusters of grapes
in their hands, some of which had a delicious flavor and some an offensive one. So the
wives said, "Why did you bring bad or wild grapes, too?"
"Because," replied their
husbands, "your souls being united with ours, we perceived in our souls that you were
speaking with this man here about truly conjugial love, saying that its delights are
delights of wisdom, and also about licentious love, saying that its delights are pleasures
of insanity. The grapes with the delicious flavor are the first kind of delights, while
the offensive-tasting or wild grapes are the second kind."
The husbands then confirmed what their
wives had said, adding that the pleasures of insanity appear in outward respects similar
to the delights of wisdom, but not in their inner qualities - "just like the good and
bad grapes that we brought," they said. "For both chaste and unchaste men are
capable of a similar wisdom in outward respects, but in its inner qualities their wisdom
is entirely different."
[8] After that the little boy came again
with a piece of paper in his hand, and he held it out to me, saying, "Read."
So I read as follows:
Be advised, all who read this, that the
delights of conjugial love ascend up to the highest heaven, and on the way and in that
heaven they join with the delights of all heavenly loves, and so enter into their
felicity, which lasts to eternity. That is because the delights of that love are also
delights of wisdom.
Be advised, too, that the pleasures of
licentious love descend down to the lowest hell, and on the way and in that hell they join
with the pleasures of all hellish loves, and so enter into their misery, which consists in
a frustration of all the heart's delights. That is because the pleasures of that love are
also pleasures of insanity.
The husbands subsequently departed with
their wives, and accompanying the little boy as far as the path he took to ascend to
heaven, they discovered that the society he had been sent from was a society of the New
Heaven, the heaven with which the New Church on earth will be affiliated. |
One of the things explained is that the
spiritual constitution of men and women is inside out and outside in. This organic
difference results in reciprocal roles for unition. Unition would not be possible unless
the spiritual organic parts of men and women were reciprocal. Wherever the word
"spiritual" is used, you can also think "mental" because the mind is
the spirit-body that continues its immortal life in the spiritual world when set free from
its connection to the physical body in which it is born and formed through social and
natural experiences on earth. The spirit-body, like all things in the spiritual world, is
made of spiritual substances from the spiritual world. This spirit-body, called our mind,
is connected to the physical body from birth, but is disconnected at death. Then the
spirit-body, or mind, that has also grown up as your physical body grew up, is set free,
and continues life in the spiritual world, forever. Swedenborg's marvelous revelations
includes what he saw in the heavens: married couples, soul-mates to each other, living in
eternal joy and bliss in magnificent palaces and peaceful cities.
So now the question is:
How do we get there?
And the answer is: BY REGENERATION.
In order to be soul mates in heaven we
must develop a character and personality other than what we were born with.
Women understand this
rational truth and live it, but men do not.
All of this is explained as part of the
Doctrine of the Wife for Husbands. We husbands need to be regenerated in an orderly way if
we're going to catch up to our wife and be united to her. What is our alternative? The
wife is given to us by God, chosen, prepared for us, just the right character, genius,
inclination, that suits us husbands. She comes prepared to conjoin herself to our mind,
fully, simply, sincerely. She loves us and is devoted to our future together in unity. For
this she will fight and suffer and only give up when we make her desperate and abuse her
and torture her. Such beasts we are, men, from our birth and inherited inclinations, but
also from our spiritual constitution. We must understand this spiritual constitution, and
I will spend quite a bit of effort trying to describe our spiritual genes and the course
of their development. Wives do not need all this intellectual apparatus. They go straight
to the truth and the good. But we men must go the circuitous route. Because we give our
inward assent only to that which we understand and find logical. Anything else we reject
and turn away from. So I've developed the Doctrine of the Wife that I may myself
understand my job as a husband who wants to be a soul mate to my wife in heaven. But
because this deals with truth, and truth with love, I cannot but desire strongly to bring
this knowledge and understanding to other men. For this is what God intensely longs for,
that He may have us as married couples in heaven, eternally united in receiving the
endless Divine blessings God longs to bestow upon us. Such is His Great Love for each of
us individually!! This is the purpose God had in creating the universe and maintaining it
forever. These things we know from the revelations He has given to Swedenborg that we may
rationally know who we are in a modern sense.
Women who want to know what is the
Doctrine of the Wife only need to skim through this article, looking especially at the
diagrams and charts. There is no need to study the details for themselves, though there
may be some benefit in terms of learning how to argue with the husband when he is in a
recalcitrant mode towards her wisdom and perception. As soon as the husband declares
himself for the Doctrine of the Wife, which he will when moved by love and fear, he will
make claims that he is following its precepts and guidelines. But he is not. He only wants
to think that he is.
Then it might be useful for the wife to
know some things about the Doctrine of the Wife from this article, and to throw it up at
the husband's face. What about this, my husband? Did you not declare that you are for it?
Then why are you behaving as if you're against it? And what about that? etc.
Husbands will then feel the urge to
rebel, to resist, to protest, to complain, to withdraw. But the wife, strengthened by the
knowledge of truth and reality, will remind him this:
My husband, you know you cannot save
yourself by yourself. You know God has appointed me to lead you to heaven. For this God
gives me perception to see your inmost inclinations, and God gives me wisdom to defeat the
pack of delusions and lies that you've surrounded yourself with. You have no choice. I'm
waiting. God is waiting. Get with it. Give up your pride and arrogance and listen to me.
Do as I ask. etc. etc.
This is the Doctrine of the
Wife--talking sense into men that they may enjoy eternal conjugial bliss.
From Swedenborg's Conjugial
Love
CL 208 The
second account:
When I was once thinking about the
secrets of conjugial love that wives hide and keep to themselves, I again saw the golden
rain that I mentioned before;* and I remembered that it fell like mist upon a hall in the
east, where three pictures of conjugial love lived, that is, three married couples who
loved each other tenderly. On seeing it, I hastened in that direction, as though bidden by
the sweetness of my reflection on that love; and as I approached, the rain turned from
gold to purple, then scarlet, and when I was almost there, it became opalescent like dew.
I knocked and the door was opened. So I said to the attendant, "Convey to the
husbands that one who was here before with an angel is present again, seeking permission
to come in and speak with them." When the attendant returned, he indicated the
husbands' assent and I entered. The three husbands and their wives were together in a
courtyard, and they returned my greeting warmly. I then asked the wives whether the white
dove had ever appeared at the window again. They said it had appeared that very day, and
also had spread its wings. "We therefore anticipated your coming," they said,
"to entreat us to reveal one more secret of conjugial love." "But why do
you say one," I asked, "when I have come here to learn many more?"
[2] "They are secrets," they
replied, "and some of them so transcend the wisdom of you men that the comprehension
of your intellect cannot grasp them. You men vaunt yourselves over us on account of your
wisdom, but we do not vaunt ourselves over you on account of ours - even though our wisdom
is superior to yours because it enters into your inclinations and affections and sees,
perceives and feels them. "You know nothing at all about the inclinations and
affections of your love, and this despite the fact that it is because of them and in
accordance with them that your intellect thinks, consequently that it is because of them
and in accordance with them that you have your wisdom. Yet wives know these things in
their husbands so well that they see them in their husbands's faces and hear them in the
intonations of the speech of their mouth - indeed so well that they feel them with the
touch of their hands on their husbands' breasts, arms and cheeks. But from a zealous love
for your happiness and at the same time our own, we pretend as if we do not know these
things, while at the same time moderating them so discreetly that whatever our husbands'
wish, pleasure or will, we accede to it by allowing and enduring it, and only redirecting
it when possible, but never compelling."
[3] "How is it that you have this
wisdom?" I asked. They replied, "It is implanted in us from creation and so from
birth. Our husbands liken it to an instinct, but we say it comes of Divine providence, in
order that men may be made happy through their wives. Our husbands have told us that it is
the Lord's will that the masculine sex act in freedom in accord with reason; and since a
man's freedom involves his inclinations and affections, therefore the Lord Himself
moderates his freedom from within, and through his wife from without, and so forms the man
and his wife together into an angel of heaven. Besides, if love is compelled, its
fundamental nature changes and it becomes no longer the same love. "But we will
explain it more frankly. We are moved to this - that is, to a discreet moderation of the
inclinations and affections of our husbands, so discreet that it seems to them that they
act in freedom in accord with their own reason - because we feel delight from their love,
and we love nothing more than for them to feel delight from our feelings of delight. But
if these feelings become matters of indifference in them, they also begin to fade in
us."
[4] When they had said this, one of the
wives went into her bedroom, and returning said, "My dove is still fluttering its
wings - a sign that we may divulge more." So they said, "We have observed
changes in the inclinations and affections of men in a variety of cases. For instance,
husbands are cold to their wives whenever they entertain vain thoughts against the Lord
and the church. They are cold whenever they pride themselves because of their own
intelligence. They are cold whenever they look upon other women with lust. They are cold
whenever they are admonished by their wives on the subject of love. We could mention a
number of other instances as well, including the fact that the coldness they feel varies
in each case. We notice this from the withdrawal of feeling from their eyes, ears and body
when their senses meet ours. "From these few illustrations you can see that we know
better than men whether all is well with them or not. If they are cold to their wives, all
is not well with them, but if they are warm to their wives it is. Wives are therefore
continually turning over in their minds ways of inducing their men to be warm to them and
not cold, and they do this with a keenness of perception incomprehensible to men."
[5] As they said this, we heard what
seemed to be the sound of a dove moaning; and at that point the wives said, "That is
a signal to us that although we are eager to divulge still deeper secrets, we may not.
Perhaps you will expose to men the secrets you have heard." "That is my
intention," I replied. "What harm will it do?" After conferring with each
other about this, the wives then said, "Disclose them if you wish. We are not
unacquainted with the power of persuasion possessed by wives. Indeed, they will say to
their husbands, 'The man is fooling. They are fictions. He is trying to amuse with
appearances and the usual nonsense typical of men. Do not believe him; believe us. We know
that you are the lovers and we your humble servants.' "So," they said,
"disclose them if you wish; but the husbands' attention will not hang on your lips,
but on the lips of their wives which they kiss. |
Swedenborg coined a new word for
marriage, which he also used as the title of one of his books: CONJUGIAL LOVE. He
explained that the extra "i" added to the normal word "conjugal" was
to mark a new rational and spiritual idea that was unknown before to most people. This is
the idea that marriage is social, legal, and religious on the outside but spiritual on the
inside. The outside aspects of marriage are called by the usual word "conjugal"
but the inside spiritual aspects are called "conjugial." God intends that we
first form, build, develop the outside conjugal aspects of marriage, and then when this is
solidly established, that we form, build, and develop the inside conjugial aspects.
Unity is to be achieved in both outside
and inside aspects. Then the marriage is truly conjugial, blessed, and eternal. But the
fact is that outside unity can be achieved and then never go on to inside unity.
Spiritually this is a disaster. First, these two partners will not be in heaven together.
Second, the woman will likely be a wife in heaven to another man, but the husband is
likely to be a devil in hell. Of course both men and women populate the vast hells
Swedenborg was allowed to visit. And yet it is the case that women are much more committed
to achieving inner unity than men, and the women who honestly strive to achieve this, will
obtain it, if not with this man, then with another in heaven. This is important to
remember when a woman feels discouragement because her husband resists the work it takes
to achieve inner unity. All is not lost, and though it's not possible to know this fully
in advance, she can trust that God will provide her with her true soul mate in the
afterlife. This is why a wife ceaselessly continues her efforts to unite herself to her
husband, externally and internally, despite all his efforts to discourage her.
And yet, at some point, a husband will
be inspired to give up his resistances and will make an honest effort to fulfill his side
of the bargain, namely, to conjoin himself to her from his efforts and struggles against
his inborn character and personality, all of which resists that union and tries to destroy
it. to help the husband in his fight and struggle, I have made up these charts that are
based on my understanding of what the Writings say about how husbands are regenerated. It
describes the steps we must go through that are universal to all husbands. These charts
are used for many topics, not just marriage. By studying these charts you gain a language
of thinking that is rational. It can help you develop a philosophy of doing as a husband,
but other things as well--in your projects, your science, your job, your parenting, your
citizenship, your hobbies, your sports, everything, since all things obey the same
spiritual laws. Knowing the system of progression called "correspondences" gives
you a window to reality, how God operates on the world and on people, and especially,
why--out of Love and Wisdom. This is a rational universe because it is created and upheld
by truth, and this is rationality itself. To understand reality we must think rationally.
And this is from God alone who is rationality itself. God has given us the Second Advent
in the Writings of Swedenborg. The Doctrine of the Wife is a philosophy of life and a
science of living extracted from those revelations.
From Swedenborg's Conjugial
Love
178. (19)
Partners who are in a state of truly conjugial love feel themselves to be a united person
and as though one flesh. We can confirm that this is so only from the declarations of
people in heaven, and not from the testimony of people on earth, since among people on
earth truly conjugial love does not presently exist.
179. (20) Truly conjugial love regarded
in itself is a union of souls, a conjunction of minds, an effort to conjunction in
breasts, and a consequent effort to conjunction in body. That it is a union of souls and
conjunction of minds may be seen above in no. 158.
(...)
Consequently, when the souls and minds
of married partners are united, and united by truly conjugial love, it follows that this
lovely union flows into their breasts, and through these into their bodies, and causes an
effort to conjunction. This is also all the more so, because conjugial love directs the
effort to its ultimate expressions, in order to bring its blissful pleasures to
fulfillment. And because the breast is at the midpoint, it is apparent why conjugial love
has found the seat of its exquisite sensation there. |
6. The
Basic Map for Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1)
Matrix 1 below is a chart similar in
syntax to previous charts that describe the six degrees of consciousness as we are
regenerated (see for example article
1 and article 2).
The first column shows the six steps in progression and they are color coded as the
others. The advantage to this harmony in all the charts is that the color segments are
cumulative so that if you're analyzing say a YELLOW segment for one topic, you can apply
to it all the YELLOW segments relating to the other topics. This enriches your perspective
on any one topic and allows for the extraction of new knowledge not anticipated in any one
chart alone. The second column lists the historical churches that correspond to each of
the six steps of marriage unity. This is possible because history recapitulates biography,
and vice versa, both following the same spiritual laws that govern all development in the
universe. These spiritual laws are known as the laws of correspondence and degrees and
they are revealed and explained in the Writings of Swedenborg. All regeneration must go
through the six degrees of consciousness, each degree being an organic function in the
human mind arranged from highest to lowest. These distinctions will be discussed later in
the article with the help of visual diagrams.
For now you can inspect the chart below,
after which you can read the explanations that follow. This will give you a basic
understanding of the six steps every husband must go through in order to become conjugial
and be able to live in heaven to eternity with his wife.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
I
INFANCY
WHITE
CELESTIAL
SENSUOUS |
Adamic |
ROMANCE |
Honeymoon
period, unmerited advance, temporary paradise, passion, involvement, egocentricity,
clinging, attraction |
II
CHILDHOOD
YELLOW
SPIRITUAL
SENSUOUS |
Noachic |
DOMINANCE |
Expressing
affection, being in competition, getting into status and role conflicts, monitoring
closeness, making a show of loyalty, insisting on keeping friends, maintaining separate
hobbies, partnering in parenting and social life |
III
ADOLESCENCE
GREEN
NATURAL
SENSUOUS |
Jewish |
EQUITY |
Achieving mutuality of lifestyle, recognizing socio-legal aspects of
marriage, reaffirming independence of ego, maintaining exclusive friends and separate
recreation activities, valuing democracy and equality of rights |
INVERSION |
IV
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
BLUE
NATURAL
RATIONAL |
Christian |
SURRENDER
DOCTRINE OF
FUNDAMENTALISM |
Recognizing
a higher supernatural or spiritual authority in life and in marriage, supporting tradition
and religion, relying on literalism of Sacred Scripture, being persuaded of various
dogmas, supporting a patriarchal social order with male
prerogatives |
V
ADULTHOOD
BROWN
SPIRITUAL
RATIONAL |
New Church
(external) |
SPECIALIZATION
DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH |
Recognizing
the authority of the Writings and using literal passages as Doctrine to justify separation
of men and women by gender roles ("balancing role" of women), expressing fervent
opposition to feminization of the Church, supporting traditional
male prerogatives, maintaining social order of specialized and separated roles for
wives and husbands |
VI
OLD AGE
BLACK
CELESTIAL
RATIONAL |
New
Church
(internal) |
UNITY
DOCTRINE OF THE WIFE |
Recognizing
the Doctrine of the Wife and its relation to celestial temptations of the husband,
confirming that Doctrine is the inner meaning of the passages without which the literal is
misunderstood and misused, confirming that the conjugial husband must become the love of
his wife's wisdom, developing aversions for all male
prerogatives, supporting affirmative action for husbands, maintaining an inventory of
confessions |
The chart above (matrix 1) lists the six
main themes that correspond to each period of marriage unity. They are:
- Romance in the Infancy period of marriage
(WHITE)
- Dominance in the Childhood period of
marriage (YELLOW)
- Equity in the Adolescence period of
marriage. (GREEN)
These first three phases are called the
three "descending steps" because we start our journey being inspired by
celestial angels who are the highest, then switch company to the spiritual angels who are
in the middle heaven, and finally for our third descending steps, we are in company with
the natural angels who dwell in the first or lowest heaven. Our regeneration is thus
furthered by the succession of angels who are in higher consciousness than we are. In the
afterlife we will dwell in the heaven corresponding to the highest degree of consciousness
that has been activated in our regeneration until the moment of our death in the physical
body. Upon immediate resuscitation into our spirit-body, we come prepared to dwell in one
of the three heavens, and if not suitable for those, we sink into the lower places of
consciousness called hells and dwell there. It is crucial therefore that we continue our
regeneration while we still live in the physical body.
Following the third descending step we
are faced with the inversion point. This represents the beginning of our spiritual life
and occurs as soon as we acknowledge God's existence and His supernatural powers. It is
not enough to acknowledge God from the religion we were born into. We must make this
acknowledgment as an adult from our own thinking and philosophy within our private
thoughts. this begins our adult relationship to the Divine and the operation of the Divine
in our lives through our voluntary cooperation. God is omnipotent and rules the lives of
all, the pious and the atheists alike. But in order to be regenerated and progress to a
heavenly consciousness, that is, acquiring a consciousness that can dwell in heaven, we
must reform our character seemingly from our own efforts and struggles. God cannot do this
for us using His omnipotence for then it would not be our victory, our consciousness, our
character, and we could not live as a human, only as a robot. And so this cooperation and
struggle is necessary.
Marriage partners become united and
heavenly to the extent they are regenerated. Without being regenerated, unity in marriage
between two individuals is not possible. The process of regeneration is organic involving
spiritual substances forming the mind as it is regenerated. This formation is permanent or
eternal. The formation can only be done while we live in the physical body, and once we
pass on and are resuscitated in our spirit-body, we can no longer regenerate in new areas
but only in the areas we have begun regeneration in our physical body. We then continue
with our regeneration to eternity, improving endlessly on the areas we brought with us and
form our spirit-body. The chart above helps you understand how the regeneration of your
character within the marriage, will form you and your wife into a single angel. Only in
the state of an angel are we fully human beings and every angel is made of a husband and a
wife. This is one of the most amazing and welcome revelations of the Second Advent (that
is, the Writings of Swedenborg).
In order therefore to be an angel in
heaven and live in eternal joy and blessedness as married partners, we must go through the
steps of regeneration, of which there are six, each corresponding to a degree of
consciousness in our mind that must be activated at the beginning of each period, then
grown to fullness before we can move on to the next period of progression.
The last of the three steps are called
the three ascending steps because we start with the natural angels in the young adulthood
period (BLUE consciousness), move on to the spiritual angels in the adulthood period of
marriage, and finally we are back with the highest or celestial angels in the old age
period of marriage. Of course these periods do not necessarily correspond to specific
ages. Some couples never reach the young adulthood period of their regeneration while
others could reach the old age period of marriage while they are still young. These things
depend on individual differences and variations. But the progression is the same for
everyone, and the content of the activities that must take place at each period are also
the same for everyone since these are dictated by spiritual laws. According to the chart,
the main theme for the three ascending steps are Surrender, Specialization, and Unity. Let
us now discuss the derivative themes for each period so that you can come to recognize
them in your own life and the lives of others.
The first three steps called descending
are Romance, Dominance, and Equity. The last three steps called ascending are Surrender,
Specialization, and Unity.
The three descending steps are totally
different from the three ascending steps in a crucial way. The three descending steps
constitute the formation of our sensuous consciousness; the three ascending steps
constitute the formation of our rational consciousness. These are described in
previous articles (e.g., article
1 and article 2).
Here is the chart again, so you can have a second look at it:
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
I
INFANCY
WHITE
CELESTIAL
SENSUOUS |
Adamic |
ROMANCE |
Honeymoon
period, unmerited advance, temporary paradise, passion, involvement, egocentricity,
clinging, attraction |
II
CHILDHOOD
YELLOW
SPIRITUAL
SENSUOUS |
Noachic |
DOMINANCE |
Expressing
affection, being in competition, getting into status and role conflicts, monitoring
closeness, making a show of loyalty, insisting on keeping friends, maintaining separate
hobbies, partnering in parenting and social life |
III
ADOLESCENCE
GREEN
NATURAL
SENSUOUS |
Jewish |
EQUITY |
Achieving
mutuality of lifestyle, recognizing socio-legal aspects of marriage, reaffirming
independence of ego, maintaining exclusive friends and separate recreation activities,
valuing democracy and equality of rights |
INVERSION |
IV
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
BLUE
NATURAL
RATIONAL |
Christian |
SURRENDER
DOCTRINE OF
FUNDAMENTALISM |
Recognizing
a higher supernatural or spiritual authority in life and in marriage, supporting tradition
and religion, relying on literalism of Sacred Scripture, being persuaded of various
dogmas, supporting a patriarchal social order with male
prerogatives |
V
ADULTHOOD
BROWN
SPIRITUAL
RATIONAL |
New Church
(external) |
SPECIALIZATION
DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH |
Recognizing
the authority of the Writings and using literal passages as Doctrine to justify separation
of men and women by gender roles ("balancing role" of women), expressing fervent
opposition to feminization of the Church, supporting traditional
male prerogatives, maintaining social order of specialized and separated roles for
wives and husbands |
VI
OLD AGE
BLACK
CELESTIAL
RATIONAL |
New
Church
(internal) |
UNITY
DOCTRINE OF THE WIFE |
Recognizing
the Doctrine of the Wife and its relation to celestial temptations of the husband,
confirming that Doctrine is the inner meaning of the passages without which the literal is
misunderstood and misused, confirming that the conjugial husband must become the love of
his wife's wisdom, developing aversions for all male
prerogatives, supporting affirmative action for husbands, maintaining an inventory of
confessions |
Sensuous consciousness is something that
we acquire automatically in the process of our growth as social individuals. We are mostly
unaware of this process and it is governed and determined by God's Divine work within each
individual, no different from the constant growth of a plant or the formation of a diamond
mine in the ground. We become conscious of our actions and thoughts, but very selectively.
We know very little about our feelings, especially deeper feelings and motives. So the
formation of our sensuous consciousness is without a conscious "doctrine" or
understanding. But this is then reversed for the three ascending steps.
The three ascending steps are
the formation of our rational consciousness. We build upon our analytic judgement
and reasoning so that we are conscious of living according to our chosen values and
lifestyle. This is the true human way of living. Acting automatically out of sensuous
consciousness is the animal way of living. As humans we have an external mind, like the
animals, and an internal mind, which the animals don't have. this internal mind is
rational and animals do not have a rational mind. animals get my with their natural mind
only, and it is capable of learning and adapting, but it is not capable of rational
consciousness. This requires a human organ called the internal mind. The internal mind
grows within the external mind by means of rational truth from God. Animals, or people,
when we are merely thinking in our natural mind, are incapable of receiving the
implantation of rational truth. When such truth is presented to our natural mind, it
laughs and mocks it as something not serious or real. And yet we are given the power from
the Divine operating within us to acknowledge a rational truth as logical when we we are
willing to make certain assumptions.
One of these essential assumptions is
that God exists and this is His reality. When we are willing to make this acknowledgment,
we are receiving the implantation of a rational truth. To the extent that we nurture this
seed by loving it and setting our thinking and feeling according to it, we make it grow in
us. Our rational consciousness grows more and more with new truths. These truths are
provided to each of us by the Divine. The most common way is through reading and being
taught, which always only represents the implantation or conception phase. In order for a
successful birth to occur we must nurture and love the developing rational idea and make
use of it in our thinking and planning and acting.
The three ascending steps develop our
rational consciousness when rational truths are taken into our mind and there we reflect
and ruminate upon them, and how they apply to us and the environment. The original source
of rational truths is Divine revelation in Sacred Scripture which every religion receives
from God through an appointed prophet or revelator. It is not possible to discover a
single rational truth by ourselves, from our own intelligence. This is because our own
intelligence is entirely formed by our sensuous consciousness and this is restricted to
physical phenomena entering the senses and various abstract ideas based on these. We could
perhaps imagine fantastic worlds that we can labeled spiritual or rational, but they would
merely be fantasies based on sensuous consciousness. Rational ideas can enter only from
the spiritual world where they exist from the Divine Wisdom or Rationality Itself. And
when these rational truths are appropriated to us through a life according to them, we are
angels, and yet not a single of those truths is our own. Swedenborg witnessed an amazing
phenomenon: When some angels suddenly got the idea that a truth is their own, they sank
down, out of heaven, and into the spiritual world below where they were tormented by evil
spirits until ready to be readmitted into their heaven when they gave up the idea that any
truth is their own. But this is the very reason why truths save us: Because they are not
us but the Divine with us, and this conjunction with the Divine is what allows God to
bestow immortality upon us. If these truths were ours, they would not conjoin us to the
Divine and we would not be immortal human beings.
You can see the descriptions given in
the chart for the three descending steps--Romance, Dominance, and Equity. These are
developmental steps in marriage that build up our sensuous consciousness. Once
this is built up, we reach the inversion, then we take the last three steps which are
ascending steps of rational consciousness.
Let's look at each of the six step
separately.
The first
descending step is called Romance and is described as a honeymoon period in the
marriage during which the couple receives a celestial environment from the angels of the
highest heaven who are then with our external mind. It is called an "unmerited
advance" because it is innocent, heavenly, and inmost joy that only the highest
angels can appropriate. But we are given to share in this unmerited advance just for so
long as the honeymoon period lasts. This varies. With some it might last weeks and months,
with others only days. It is marked by mutual involvement and passionate attraction. The
two partners cling to each other and are disturbed when separated. They act and feel as if
they want to conjoin and become one body, one mind. This is a recapitulation of or
correspondence to the Infancy period of the human race called the Adamic Church, also the
Golden Age of the human race. It is described in the Writings of Swedenborg who visited
the heavenly inhabitations of these most ancient peoples who lived on this earth during
the cradle of civilization. But this period is then consummated and we must take the
second descending step in order to continue with our regeneration within the marriage.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
I
INFANCY
WHITE
CELESTIAL
SENSUOUS |
Adamic |
ROMANCE |
Honeymoon
period, unmerited advance, temporary paradise, passion, involvement, egocentricity,
clinging, attraction |
There are bad things that also happen
during this period: Rejection. This is the end of the romance. The dynamics will be
discussed in a section below as the argument unfolds. For now, let's step through the
remaining steps.
The second
descending step is called by the theme of Dominance (YELLOW consciousness) and
corresponds to the Childhood period of the marriage. The two partners are working out the
details of their relationship as a couple, negotiating the power and status differences
that will govern their behavior, rights, privileges, prerogatives,
and expectations. This is a period during which they carefully monitor each other's
closeness and loyalty to one another. There is an attempt on the part of the husband to
dominate the wife through his shows of affections, physical and verbal, and through gifts
and special treats. The wife is drawn to the husband and desires conjunction more and
more, but the husband withdraws from her attempts and counteracts them, defeats them. He
sees the relationship as a struggle for maintaining his independence within the rules of
the marriage.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
II
CHILDHOOD
YELLOW
SPIRITUAL
SENSUOUS |
Noachic |
DOMINANCE |
Expressing
affection, being in competition, getting into status and role conflicts, monitoring
closeness, making a show of loyalty, insisting on keeping friends, maintaining separate
hobbies, partnering in parenting and social life |
Thus the husband has a separatist
motivation and inclination while the wife has a conjoint motivation and inclination. This
brings them into conflict and competition. Yet they continually rededicate themselves to
the partnership, drawn together by parenting and joint domestic management. At last this
step is also resolved and consummated. The couple can go on the third and final descending
step.
The third
descending step is called Equity.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
III
ADOLESCENCE
GREEN
NATURAL
SENSUOUS |
Jewish |
EQUITY |
Achieving
mutuality of lifestyle, recognizing socio-legal aspects of marriage, reaffirming
independence of ego, maintaining exclusive friends and separate recreation activities,
valuing democracy and equality of rights |
INVERSION |
This GREEN consciousness develops
through the furtherance or presence of the natural angels who inflow into our external
mind where sensuous consciousness develops. The internal mind has not yet begun to
develop, not until the first ascending step is taken after the inversion. Now in the
adolescence period of Equity, the partners are striving to achieve a mutually convenient
and enjoyable lifestyle that suits them both. They now more than before recognize the
socio-legal status of marriages and govern their competitive issues through principles of
equity and democracy. Each partner can appeal to their human rights and to the right to be
treated fairly. They see their unity in their ability to constitute a functioning,
mutually beneficial partnership in which the rights and conveniences of both are respected
and cared for. Yet they continue to see themselves as separate individuals in their own
right, insist on maintaining a modicum of independence in exclusive non-sexual friendships
and recreational activities. However this unity remains an external achievement in the
external mind. The time comes when they are ready to face the internal mind and the birth
of their rational consciousness. This is possible only with surrendering our lives and our
marriage to a higher, supernatural Being, and being willing to be obedient to the rules
and commandments of God.
The refusal to cross into BLUE
consciousness territory with the help of the natural angels is to run the course of
vastation in sensuous consciousness. This consists of becoming abusive to the wife, as
explained in the section on temptations below.
It is a rational truth that the same
spiritual laws of progression shape evolution, history, and biography. Our individual
steps of progression recapitulate at the micro-level and within our lifetime the centuries
and millennia of history at the macro-level of evolution. Our progression in regeneration
must go through the same six steps as the progression of civilizations. Both civilizations
and individuals progress on a path of spiritual truths. These steps have been revealed in
Sacred Scripture in every generation. For our modern world of science, democracy, and
global communication the Sacred Scripture revelations were given in the Writings of
Swedenborg (1688-1771) whose scientifically trained mind and great native genius allowed
him to experience the rational world in his sensuous consciousness. This only happens
normally when we are disconnected from the physical body by its death. But Swedenborg was
given sensuous consciousness of the spiritual or rational world for 27 years and given the
mission to record his experiences and make sense of them in a rational and scientific
manner. This he did admirably in over
30 volumes of Writings in Neo-Latin that have now been translated in many languages.
So the belief in the existence of God is
to believe a rational truth. The belief that God makes revelations is also rational since
how else could we obtain these rational truths? It is rational to think that there is a
physical world and a spiritual world. It is rational to think that marriage is sacred
because instituted by God and commanded in Sacred Scripture. It is rational to believe
that God supervises and manages every single detail of our life, otherwise what is the
meaning of Omnipotence but an empty promise. And what is the meaning of Omnipresence but
an empty word unless it means that God is present with each of us all the time, thus in
all our thinking and in all our feeling. The fact is that God is our Divine Therapist and
He ceaselessly strives to influence our thoughts and the course of our life so as to
improve our lot and bring us into eternal happiness. This is the purpose of our
regeneration. Since we are born animalistic and tied to devils in hell, we quickly develop
a character that is hardly human, fit only to be an insane devil in hell. This is the
testimony of Swedenborg and you need to read the
Writings to really see it for yourself. So God must stick with us real close, to the
stream of our thoughts and emotions, and bend them as much as we allow it, towards the
true and the good. Then, it's up to us to love this truth and use it to change our
character, our personality, what we think, how we love. We are responsible for this. This
is our part of the bargain. And we accomplish this through the three descending steps
followed by the three ascending steps.
The first
ascending step is thus called Surrender (BLUE consciousness). Note in the chart
that the three ascending steps are listed with a Doctrine that justifies the theme for
each step. Doctrine refers to Divine Teaching from revelation or Sacred Scripture.
Rational truths about reality and God must come to us through others who know of the
revelations and teach them in each generation and in every society. The first step in
rational consciousness of the Divine is made through the Doctrine of Fundamentalism. In
this state we recognize and acknowledge God's authority over our marriage and we tend to
support traditions and religion, of which there are many varieties to choose from. In this
mental frame we rely on literalism which is doctrinal understanding that is at the same
level as the literal words and sentences of Sacred Scripture or revelation. In this state
we acquire persuasions and dogmas from other followers. We also support and identify with
a patriarchal social order and symbolism that contains many male
prerogatives. Husbands expects wives to obey the literal of Scripture that puts women
in an obedient and secondary role to men. This attitude must be consummated and left
behind as we make the second ascending step. Unless we move on, we get vastated at the
earlier period which means that we falsify the rational truths we receive from the literal
wording of Scripture. We then use them to justify our convenience and selfish desire for
supremacy, and we lose sight of the truth contained in the revelations. Our regeneration
is thus arrested.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
I
N V
E R
S I
O N
|
IV
YOUNG ADULTHOOD
BLUE
NATURAL
RATIONAL |
Christian |
SURRENDER
DOCTRINE OF
FUNDAMENTALISM |
Recognizing
a higher supernatural or spiritual authority in life and in marriage, supporting tradition
and religion, relying on literalism of Sacred Scripture, being persuaded of various
dogmas, supporting a patriarchal social order with male
prerogatives |
The second
ascending step is then called Specialization (BROWN consciousness) and involves a
step up by switching to the spiritual angels. We now receive a more interior form rational
truth called spiritual-rational. In those who recognize the Writings of Swedenborg as the
basis of their religion this period can be called "Specialization" in marriage
roles. This is based on what the Writings call the Doctrine of the Church and many
passages are collected in this state of mind that show the specialization of the roles
between women and men. This involvement in collecting and keeping track of passages that
prove role specialization is justified as Scriptural and has affinity with the Doctrine of
Fundamentalism in the earlier period. Men see the women they're married to as serving a
"balancing role" in their lives and families and the Church. The men are opposed
to anything that does not maintain strict role differentiation in church activities
including worship, instruction and evangelization. Gender roles are worked out and
specified in each new social activity or organization. Sprciptural passages from the
Writings are always cited to justify these role specifications and statements. Attempts to
blur the gender roles are seen as "feminization" threats to the Church and
community. New Doctrines based on different passages regarding gender roles are ignored
and resisted on various grounds of exegesis.
This period of marriage, though
spiritual-rational, also must be consummated because it is opposed to true unity in
marriage.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
V
ADULTHOOD
BROWN
SPIRITUAL
RATIONAL |
New Church
(external) |
SPECIALIZATION
DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH |
Recognizing
the authority of the Writings and using literal passages as Doctrine to justify separation
of men and women by gender roles ("balancing role" of women), expressing fervent
opposition to feminization of the Church, supporting traditional
male prerogatives, maintaining social order of specialized and separated roles for
wives and husbands |
The third
ascending step is called Unity (BLACK consciousness) because it is the final step
as we reestablish communication with the celestial angels of the third heaven. We were
connected to these angels during our WHITE period called ROMANCE, which is when we were
truly happy and together as partners who love each other passionately. But very soon,
probably too soon for most women, the husband takes his first descending step, and then
his second descending step, and then his third, and not until the inversion during his
first ascending step, does he begin to look to heaven and the wife's hope returns for the
possibility of reestablishing connection with the celestial angels. Then the second
ascending step, and the wife's hope grows deeper, but why is she still insecure? This is
not yet unity. And so the third ascending step must be taken.
The Basic Map for
Understanding Regeneration of Marriage (Matrix 1) |
ORDERLY SEQUENCE |
HISTORICAL
CHURCH |
MAIN
THEME |
DERIVATIVE
THEMES |
VI
OLD AGE
BLACK
CELESTIAL
RATIONAL |
New
Church
(internal) |
UNITY
DOCTRINE OF THE WIFE |
Recognizing
the Doctrine of the Wife and its relation to celestial temptations of the husband,
confirming that Doctrine is the inner meaning of the passages without which the literal is
misunderstood and misused, confirming that the conjugial husband must become the love of
his wife's wisdom, developing aversions for all male
prerogatives, supporting affirmative action for husbands, maintaining an inventory of
confessions |
For those who know the Writings of
Swedenborg and recognize its Divine authority the final step of regeneration within
marriage is the inner UNITY (BLACK consciousness) that comes from practicing the Doctrine
of the Wife. Yes, this same Doctrine of the Wife that this article is about. Many who
recognize the Writings as Sacred Scripture still resist the idea that the Doctrine we make
for ourselves to live the life of our religion, cannot be collected from the literal
statements of the Writings. This is precisely what is done in the prior period called the
Doctrine of the Church. But as the Writings explain, Doctrine based on the literal
statements of Sacred Scripture can easily be heresies of various sorts because the literal
of Sacred Scripture contains apparent truths for the sensuous consciousness of the reader.
Several such heresies are explained and discussed in a related
article.
In the present case, the Doctrine of the
Wife is also based on the Writings but brings together different passages than the
passages on gender roles in the prior period (BROWN consciousness). It is shown that
gender roles are external rather than internal. The internal within the external reverses
gender roles and gender symbolisms. This is also recognized in the prior period but the
mind does not give assent to their use for role reversal. Partly this is out of fear that
something sacred in the Church would be violated, and partly out of resistance to the
temptations to be overcome during this period of BLACK consciousness, as will be explained
below in the section on temptations in marriage.
But first, we need to go over again the
basic components of the chart, this time with a diagram from a slightly different
perspective. Diagrams of this type are useful to memorize because they give you a rational
system for categorizing your thinking about marriage, regeneration, and the mind of men
and women.
7. Comments
Summarized by Rev. Erik Sandstr?m, Sr in this article on Feminine
Wisdom New Church Life 1997;107:210-225 The following teachings will further describe the
nature of the feminine mind and its wisdom:
"Females or women signify the
affections of truth" (AC 3974, emphasis added). The question was asked: "What
does a wise man or wisdom have to do with a woman?" And the answer: "What is a
wise man or wisdom apart from a woman or apart from love?" (CL 56:2) "Women are
born forms of love, while men - with whom they unite themselves in order to be loved in
return - are receivers" (CL 160). "A wife is given a perception of her husband's
affections, and also the highest prudence in knowing how to moderate them" (CL 166).
"Wives keep this perception in them hidden and conceal it from their husbands for
reasons that are necessary in building conjugial love, friendship and trust, so that they
may have bliss in living together and happiness of life" (CL 167). "A wife's
conjunction with her husband's intellectual wisdom exists inwardly, because this wisdom is
characteristic of men, and it ascends into a light in which women are not. This is why
women do not speak from it . . . . Nevertheless, wives still have these things with them
inwardly" (CL 165). "There is a conjugial sphere which flows in from the Lord
through heaven into each and every thing of the universe, extending itself even to its
lowest forms . . . . This sphere is received by the female sex and communicated through it
to the male sex" (CL 222, 223). "An intellectual form cannot grow warm with
conjugial warmth from itself but only from the conjunctive warmth of one in whom that
warmth has been implanted by creation" (CL 223). "Affection does not separate
itself from the thoughts with women as it does with men" (CL 169).
"The elevation into higher warmth
in women is an elevation into a more and more chaste and pure conjugial love, and this
continually toward the conjugial which from creation is innate in their inmost being"
(CL 188:2). "The wisdom of wives is superior to that of men because it enters into
their inclinations and affections and sees, perceives and feels them . . . . But from a
zealous love for their happiness and at the same time their own . . . they moderate them
so discreetly that, whatever their husbands wish, pleasure or will, they accede to it by
allowing it and enduring it, and only directing it when possible, but never
compelling" (CL 208:2).
Comments by Linda Simonetti
Odhner New Church Life 1997;107:324-326
(...)
With science given its due, I move on to
society. The roles of men and women in the home and in the workplace need continuing
thought. If women have a special calling to make sure that home is a place where everyone,
both male and female, can come for rest, nourishment, safety, belonging, and connection,
doesn't it follow that men have a similar calling to make sure that the workplace is an
environment where anyone who chooses, whether male or female, can earn a fair wage and an
honest living, receive respectful treatment and work under decent conditions? Does blaming
career women for poverty and dependency further that purpose? Saying that the workplace is
men's special province, so women should stay out, is like saying that the home is women's
arena, so men should stay out. Men have an important influence in the home, and so do
women in the workplace.
The state of Pennsylvania is compelling
children to be away from home for a large part of the day from an early age (as we with
children in the Bryn Athyn Church School know all too well; the recent crisis there about
compliance with the law has raised some strong feelings). A wife and mother might wish to
remain at home to nurture her family, but when nobody else is there, the primary purpose
for her presence is removed. Resisting the establishment of an institutional culture may
be something many women feel called to do; some of us would prefer to do it from our
homes, but if we are driven to be political about it, we will. I would also love to see
some zeal from men to make sure that the place of home in society is not legislated out of
existence, but how can we expect this unless men have ongoing firsthand knowledge of what
a home can be? The rigid separation of men and women, workplace and home, and the
breakdown of communication between them, can have the effect of undercutting our freedom
in both areas. It is tempting, though perhaps presumptuous, to speculate that the people
who decided that first graders must be in school at least five hours a day, and those who
enforce the law so zealously, never knew a rich, fulfilling home life, or have forgotten
what it is like.
Finally, I wish to point out that
getting from what the Writings actually say to the statement "The male is truth and
the female is good" requires a leap of inference, but since we are told that the
statement is "universally taught in the Writings," we don't learn how or why Mr.
Sandstr?m made the leap; he gives us no justification for it, so why expect us to be
convinced? The same is true of other statements in the article. I would hesitate to say
that anything is universally taught in the Writings until I've read them all carefully.
Some odd reversals pop up, like love as the bridegroom and wisdom as the bride in TCR
37:3.
Rev. Sandstrom's reply to the above is
posted here
From an article titled "Male and
Female Created He Them" by Rev. Kurt H. Asplundh in New Church Life
1982;102:43-49
It can be said that both men and women
think; but man thinks from the understanding while woman thinks from the will. "And
because the understanding perceives things which are above the body and beyond the
world" while the love or will "does not go beyond what it feels", there
must be a difference in the wisdom of men and women. The Writings teach that there is
indeed a difference and that the wife's wisdom "is not possible with the man, nor the
man's [rational] wisdom with the wife" (CL 168). Rational wisdom "climbs into a
light in which women are not..." Thus women do not speak from it and, when in the
company of men where such matters are discussed, remain silent and simply listen (CL 165).
It is for this same reason that women
should not become preaching ministers. We are told that "women who think in the way
men do on religious subjects, and talk much about them, and still more if they preach in
meetings, do away with the feminine nature, which is affectional..." (SD 5936).
On the other hand, the Writings point
out that wives have a better knowledge of their husbands' moral wisdom than they do. They
have a perception of the affections of the husband and use the highest degree of prudence
in moderating them" (CL 166). When a wife seeks to turn her husband's wisdom to good
use, seeking wisdom from him and inspiring him in his quest for ever greater understanding
of truth, the Lord blesses both. They find delight in use, man from seeking the means for
it, woman from turning those means into beautiful forms of it. They also find delight in
each other. Their conjugial relationship grows. The wife becomes more a wife and the
husband more a husband. She becomes increasingly feminine, he increasingly masculine.
The Writings, then, in describing the
distinction between men and women, in no way set men above women as superior in
intelligence and wisdom. In fact, the Writings record what one angel wife said to
Swedenborg about the supposed comparative wisdom of men over women: "You men glory
over us on account of your wisdom, but we do not glory over you on account of ours; and
yet," she added, "ours excels yours..." (CL 208:2).
(...)
Neither should men depart from their
intended masculine affections. What becomes of a man who loses his love of growing wise,
who simply rests content in what he already knows or hears from others'? He becomes
intellectually lazy and slothful, and of no use to society. If he allows himself to be
mastered by cupidities of self-indulgence, sloth and intellectual deceit, he forfeits his
God-given ability to rise above the world and worldly concerns in the pursuit of wisdom
which alone can be the salvation of both man and woman. Man has the responsibility to seek
wisdom. When he fails to exercise this responsibility, there follows a failure of the
conjugial and a breakdown of the orderly relationship of some masculine and feminine
natures.
(...)
original article found
here
From leon@hawaii.edu
Fri Jun 29 19:27:16 2001
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:29:33 -1000
From: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu
Subject: conjugial unity
You wrote:
> For Leon James,
> I have been working through the Doctrine of the Wife.
> Thank you for the great thoughts and documentation. I need
> a little help with the application. "In all things"? Can
> you give a realistic example of this? Like, what movie
> should we see? Bocaburger or hamburger tonight? Take a
> course in sacred lovemaking? Skip church for a canoe ride?
> Is it, as a wife, we know what you really need - what would
> be best in the long run?
Yes, I can see that you are taking it
seriously (very rare event for me) because you are led to ask REAL questions about the
Doctrine of the Wife.
You ask "In all things?" which
I take refers to the Doctrine of the Wife which says that a regenerating husband who is
seeking internal unity with his wife (=conjugial love)can achieve this only when he
elevates his wife's judgment above his own. And so you are asking a very practical and
logical question: is the husband to yield to his wife in all things, or only in some
things?
The answer I would give is, Yes, in all
things. But I want to mention this right away: my wife Diane would respond--Leon, is this
not an exaggeration? Maybe you mean, in all things that have to do with relationship, with
the husband's affections and the things he is unaware about himself but which things the
wife can perceive.
And to this I respond: Yes, this is
true. I'm asking myself the question, OK, what is excluded, and the things that occur to
me are things that have to do with his job maybe, his expertise maybe, his choice of
sports maybe, his professional clients maybe, etc., and each time I say to myself, No, No,
No, none of those things are excluded. So I'm back with my original answer: Yes, in all
things.
But now I need to give some
explanations, especially why should the husband put his judgment below his wife's in
professional matters having to do with his job expertise, like how to change a carburetor,
how to write up the report of an experiment, or what sermon topic to pick. How can I say
that the wife's judgment should come before his in these "forensic" and
"non-domestic" situations??
I think that any husband who thinks
deeply about this and is willing to witness himself in these situations, will admit that
if he picks his judgment over his wife's in anything at all, he is discounting her
intelligence, her wisdom, her judgment and evaluation. Remember: we're discussing a
regenerating husband who seeks internal unity. If you're talking about another man, then
this answer does not apply in the same way. We can discuss this issue some other time.
Back to the current issue: a regenerating husband desiring unity cannot, repeat cannot,
accept the idea of a disagreement with his wife on anything whatsoever.
Disagreements, differing opinions, you
think this I think that type of thing, is out. Anyone can see that these things cannot
exist in a conjugial couple in heaven, right? So my point is clear and rational: if a
husband wants to attain to that inner unity called conjugial love, he cannot tolerate a
disagreement or differing conclusion or judgment.
But what happens when there is a
difference of opinion or judgment? I can tell you what I do: I'm totally committed in my
mind to the idea that this cannot stand. So I reason with my wife: Honey, what about this,
and Honey, what about that. Well she tells me right away. Not this because, and not that
because. If I can see it, great, I switch over to her side in my mind. But if I can't see
it, I try until the moment when I get a clue that I've gone too far and am beginning to
bother her, scare her, annoy her, exhaust her, make her unhappy. I then immediately make
myself stop and switch over to her side in my mind. This is painful. I feel like
rebelling. I feel like forcing her. I feel like....well, you can imagine, whatever. But
none of this has power over me. These negative, rebellious, un-conjugial things are in my
external mind, while my commitment to the Doctrine of the Wife is in my internal mind
because I know the DOW will take me to her heaven as her husband, while winning over her
and having me prevail, will take me to my hell (without her--the Lord will provide another
soul mate for her, I know full well).
So she is my only chance. Why would I
want to fool around with that by diminishing her influence, her wisdom, her say, her
judgment???
And yet this is what I had done for
decades!!! We men are extremely self-destructive, and our wives can save us from ourselves
IF WE GIVE HER THE POWER. It's like giving your wife power of attorney so she can sign
checks and make decisions involving the husband's property. The regenerating husband who
wants internal unity with his wife (=conjugial love) must compel himself to disregard the
things in his external mind that are merely political, ethnic, religious, and instead, to
regard only the things in his internal mind, which is spiritual and celestial. The
celestial mind DESIRES to give his wife priority over himself. He loves it. He doesn't
take the opportunity of saying, Wife, this has to do with science, with religion, with
business, with profession, with expertise, with correspondence, with symbolism, with
tradition, with my parents, with my closest friends, etc., so just let me decide on this,
OK. No, he doesn't do this.
Instead he puts unity ahead of his
"rights" as an individual. There is no individual in the conjugial relationship.
The conjugial couple is ONE angel. When Swedenborg talked to the husband, he said the wife
was present. When he talked to the wife, she said the husband is present. When he looked
at one then the other, Swedenborg exclaimed in amazement: You two look one. And they said,
we are one.
Again, you wrote:
> Like, what movie
> should we see? Bocaburger or hamburger tonight? Take a
> course in sacred lovemaking? Skip church for a canoe ride?
> Is it, as a wife, we know what you really need - what would
> be best in the long run?"
The point is that the husband who
desires internal unity LOVES the idea of choosing her movie instead of the one he first
chose or thought of. First, he needs to PRETEND that this is so. The Writings explain this
by calling it "conjugial simulation" and it is given as a commandment. At first
it pained me to accept her choice and give up my mind. Later I compelled myself to choose
hers but I hated it. Finally I loved the idea of putting mine aside for the sake of hers.
It made me feel closer to heaven--O, what an amazing feeling all husbands would want if
they allow themselves to experience it.
Bocaburger or hamburger tonight? The
same thing as the movie. A course in sacred lovemaking? Same answer. Diane started going
to Yoga glasses with a neighbor woman. The woman stopped but Diane continued. She invited
me, I declined. Then I realized--Wow, Leon, you're throwing away an opportunity. So the
week after I went along. Now we both do it every week and I've been greatly benefited on
many dimensions (don't want to make this toooooo long...). ((By the way: we recently
bought a book called Partner Yoga, and I'm greatly enriched by what all this started....))
Finally, you inquired:
> Is it, as a wife, we know what you
really need - what would
> be best in the long run?"
Yes, definitely. I just want to add
this: "And you know I have this from the Lord." The way I would put it: by
loving to put my wife's wisdom ahead of mine I'm practicing conjugial love, and I'm
getting closer to the Lord. I cannot get closer to the Lord on my own. But through my wife
and in my wife, I can. The justification for this I give in the article on the Doctrine of
the Wife. The Lord God said to Abraham "Hearken unto Sarah" and Scripture tells
us that Abraham was pained in the extreme and balked until the Lord gave him a direct
command. And what was this about? His socks? His hamburger? His sheep? No. It was about
his politics and his religion and his legal issues, because it had to do with Hagar and
Ishmael and inheritance, and nation building. Still the wisdom was given to Sarah, not to
Abraham. The Writings tell us that Sarah=Divine Truth. Thus it is the wife who receives
from the Lord the highest and deepest truth called "celestial wisdom."
Should not the husband love to obey this
truth? And when Abraham listened to his wife, he got what he wanted from the Lord. The
Lord works with wives in this way. Otherwise we men would love ourselves and cast
ourselves headlong into hell dozens of times a day. If we followed this rule there would
be no wars among men. Paradise could easily return to earth if men owned up to this truth.
Instead of the spirit of the wolf, it would be the spirit of the lamb that would then
animate our hearts. Such is the softening, wonderfully sweet and humanizing effect a woman
has on a man.
Let me know if this makes sense or not.
I usually am not given the opportunity to go this far with my topic. Diane says I'm
incredibly long winded and I write loooooooong sentences, and too many. She says, how do
you know they want to hear all this? And so I endeavor to make my sentences shorter, and
to write more naturally.
Finally, you wrote:
> I would love to meet your wife!
> Thanks for your contributions.
Thank you. I appreciate it. She is
indeed wonderful to me and without her my knowledge of the Lord would be but a distant
fantasy even as I'm an expert Swedenborgian. What makes the Writings real for me is to see
what it says in me. This is called illustration from the Lord as one reads the Word for
the sake of living it.
Aloha, and Peace.
Leon James
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 12:02:08 -1000
From: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu
To: rex@workhost.com
Subject: husbands
> Dad,
> I interpret your "total subjugation of the husband" philosophy to be a
self-imposed strategy for controlling your personal
> tendency towards "total domination". Like a recovering alcoholic who
swears off all drinks whatsoever, you advise "yield > in all things, disagree in
nothing!" But not everyone is an alcoholic. How about a little balance, man? My wife
is teaching
> me that the successful approach to achieving balance is NOT polarizing ourselves
against our natural tendencies, but
> rather cultivating those aspects that need strengthening, and INTEGRATING them into
our personality.
Hi Rex,
thanks for your contribution. It's a beginning. Now you need to move forward--we all need
to. Your first position can't be your last! The justification for the husband's voluntary
deference to the wife in any disagreement that crops up is based on psychobiology, not
personal history. One cannot understand its necessity unless one views it in that
scientific perspective. If it were personal, then it would not be universal. But if it's
psycho-biology, then it is universal regardless of the personal history of the individual
who proposes it.
That it's psycho-biology, I have fully
justified in the Doctrine of the Wife--see Parts 1 through 4 (if you can make yourself!).
Briefly, and without full justification,
I would summarize it thus: When we pass on we are spirits in the spiritual world, freed
from being tied to the physical world. We live in a spiritual body made of spiritual
substances from the spiritual sun. Our spirit is our mind, so the character and loves you
take with you then determines the quality of your life. The outisde must reflect the
inside--not like here where the physical body and phsyical world absorbs this and doesn't
show. The outside is material and fixed in relation to our personalities. But in the
spiritual world, the outside substantive world must match the inside personality (loves
and belief systems. Which is also why people of a different character cannot live
together.
In heaven the outside is a paradise and
a royal palace with incredible art, etc. for each conjugial couple. Everything relfects
the love and beauty that such inner unition creates in the heavenly atmosphere. One angel
is made of two individuals, male and female. This is a biological union. It can only be
achieved in one way: the husband's inner affective mind (love) unites with the wife's
inner cognitive mind (wisdom), thus making a unity. This unity cannot be achieved in any
other way.
So it makes sense that the husband must
create within his inner mind the right kind of affections or loves that can unite with the
wisdom in the wife's inner mind. The Doctrine of the Wife allows the husband to prepare
his mind in this necessary way.
Aloha and Peace,
Love,
Dad
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001
To: leon@hawaii.edu
Subject: Re: conjugial unity
Dear Leon,
I appreciate you sharing so many thoughts about your "Doctrine of the Wife." I
have been very interested, because for quite a while now I've been wondering whether there
would be many less divorces if women felt more confident as leaders commissioned to teach
their husbands how to have a real marriage with them -- to see the source of Conjugial
Love within them not as something passive, flowing out and somehow mystically influencing
things, but as something active, to be voiced and insisted upon. Also, of course, this
would require men to respect their wives as sources of the knowledge of how to have a
genuine marriage.
I'll just say this. My husband and I have been married for over nineteen years, and enjoy
a relationship that feels better and closer every year. When I
showed my husband your e-mail, about how a marriage can be better if a husband goes with
his wife's decisions on things, his immediate reaction was, "It's true!" Without
any big decision on our part, we have been moving more and more into following my feelings
about decisions about our joint life together, and it has indeed made us feel closer and
closer. This always involves discussions and give-and-take between us, but he more and
more wants to go with what I want, because he finds that in that way we get closer. I
wonder if this happens because a wife's decisions will automatically involve a wish for
her and her husband to feel more connected, and to be more connected to their children,
whereas a husband's decisions don't necessarily start out with that as the main goal.
We have found ourselves running into many numbers in "Conjugial Love" and
"Arcana" that seem to support this idea. I wish I had time to go and look them
up. I'll just leave you with this one: "It is instinctive in a wife's love to unite
her husband's will to her own, for in this way a wife becomes one who belongs to her
husband, and the husband one who belongs to his wife. Thus the two become one
person." CL 196
Love,
K
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001
From: Leon James leon@hawaii.edu
Subject: Affirmative action for husbands
This may sound like an amusing thing to
say to husbands: We need to treat our wife with affirmative action. This is part of the
Doctrine of the Wife, as you no doubt guessed. I'd like to explain this principle as a
summary of one of the articles in the collection I call Swedenborgian Marriage Handbook
for Husbands (on my Swedenborg Hawaii Web site).
We all know that this is a man's world.
We all know the sad and horrible history of discrimination and abuse against women, still
going on. This is why it's appropriate to call it a man's world, that is, inimical and
hostile to women. Such is the intense hatred of men against the conjugial. We also know
that with conjugial couples there is no possibility of internal disagreement, which means,
disagreement about affections and loves. This means the will and decision making. The
conjugial husband is not capable of sustaining or tolerating an affective disagreement
with his wife. The moment he becomes conscious that she wants X, he wants it too.
A husband who is regenerating and
aspires to conjugial unity from within, can he tolerate a disagreement with his wife? Can
he impose his will over hers? No and No. Instead, he changes his will to match hers. This
is internal unity. This makes him happy, ecstatic, and wise from his study of the
Writings. But if he tolerates disagreements with his wife, his study of the Writings will
not make him wise, but he will remain in his foolishness and evil.
Husbands who realize this will try to
achieve agreement by imposing his will upon his wife until she agrees. Or else, she will
feel compelled to act like she is in agreement with him since she knows otherwise he will
punish her by sulking, yelling, saying harsh things, pouting, refusing to have sex,
neglecting her, and so forth. To avoid these indignities and discomforts, she will pretend
to agree with him. But in this way the two remain disjoint, not conjoint. To avoid this,
she will try her best to "change herself" so as to really agree with him, not
just pretend to agree. But ultimately this may not work either, and she is left disunited.
So it's all up to the husband to come to her rescue in this awful situation.
He must appeal to his chivalry and
friendship for her, and an inner sense of fairness that leads him to regret the fact that
this is a man's world (as explained above). So to accomplish this rescue process he must
assume the principle of affirmative action.
This makes sense to me since I
discovered that men have all sorts of prerogatives they just live with in comfort despite
the gross unfairness and selfishness of it. I made long lists of where I was using my
prerogatives as a man and husband (see on the Web site under Confessions by Husbands).
Women know what I mean, though men take some more convincing usually.
So given that we men have enjoyed
prerogatives at the expense of women (e.g., we dominate the topics with our wife, we take
the privilege of losing our temper and getting angry and intimidating our poor distraught
wife, we impose our will, we pass gas, skip shaving, wear unseemly shorts, take off our
shirts in mixed company, have bad breath, insist on our rights, demand our privileges, use
the Word to justify our supremacy (some say "primacy"--same thing), etc. So now
we need to bend over backwards to restore some fairness to women in our society. We need
to abandon the idea of equity or equality and choose to carry the bigger burden in any
thing, small or big. If our wife thinks X, and we think Y, we must veer to her side and
think X. Our wife chooses A and we want B, we must reverse and choose A. Whatever she
wants, we must want. Whatever she doesn't want, we must not want. We need to take our clue
from her. We need to tell ourselves: She sees, I'm blind.
We must stop claiming that since we work
outside the home and bring home the paycheck, therefore when we get home it's fair that
the wife serves us and caters to us, or at least, protects us from more domestic work.
False--an argument straight from hell. We must unite with our wife--that's our topmost
task in life. Period. That's why we are here on earth, and the second we no longer can go
further, the Lord liberates us from the physical world.
This needs to be the mantra of every
husband on earth who wants to liberate himself into an angel husband in eternal bliss: She
sees, I'm blind.
Shocked men and women who read this
feature of the Doctrine of the Wife may say: This cannot be. Surely the husband and wife
each have their area of knowledge, and whoever has the greater knowledge in some thing,
that person should be the leader in that thing and should decide. Or else, they should
take turns or bargain with each other.
To this, I say: Nonsense.
Instead: affirmative action for
husbands; bend over backwards to accommodate her wants; she sees, I'm blind.
I know this from revelation in the
Writings. I understood it only when I saw it in my life, and only to the extent it existed
in my life, my decisions, my behavior, my thinking, my temptations and reluctances and
resistances to it. This kind of revelation or understanding is called
"illustration" in the Writings. It is guaranteed to every husband who is willing
to live by the doctrine of the wife (that is, its principles and attitude of putting the
wife first in all things wihtout exception).
Besides, a wife would not want to make
decisions in areas she feels and perceives that her husband has more knowledge than her.
Her opinion would match his. I'm talking about all those times when they do not match, and
she insists, begs, cajoles, opines, requests, one thing, and he refuses, going instead by
his contrary opinion, feeling, want, loyalty, etc. This he should not do if his intention
is conjunction with his wife. It's obvious to women, but to men it's dense. Therefore they
need to study the Doctrine of the Wife and see it working in their daily lives. We have
endless opportunities to practice. I started decades ago and my wife can make long lists
of my daily failures with the doctrine, where my conduct fails to match my sermon. This is
a sign I must redouble my efforts and the Lord will give me, us all, strength. He is
waiting for us to ask Him. He wants every husband to look for Him not through himself but
through his wife. The Lord longs to create an angel out of every married couple.
Every Christian woman is born with
conjugial love implanted in her heart. Conjugial love is the crown of the true Christian
religion. The wife is the more beautiful because she has inner wisdom from the Lord and
beauty is the appearance of wisdom. The husband's ardent desire for conjunction with his
wife is proportional to his love for the Lord, not the other way round. Proof of the
husband's love for the Lord is achieving conjunction with his wife. When a husband turns
from his wife as his will, thus disagrees with her, and confirms this disagreement by
letting it continue, he turns away from her, and turns to himself. Thus he is in hell. No
one in hell worships the Lord, but only himself.
To turn from himself towards his wife
means to compel himself (a) not to disagree with her, and (b) to agree with her. By doing
this, he is turning himself to heaven and the Lord. Thus he and her together will be
there, and they are there already. Amen!
Aloha,
Leon James |
End of Part 1
Go to the other parts:
Part 1 || Part 2
|| Part
3 ||
Part 4
Note: You may want to consult
a more recent version
of this essay:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/wife.html
Please
email
Leon James
Related Articles:
The surrendered wife and the surrendered husband ||
Theistic Psychology || Spiritual
Geography--Part 2: Jacob's Ladder and Other Psycho-Dynamic Applications|| Spiritual
Geography--Part 1-- Graphic Maps of Consciousness for Regeneration || Dual
Citizenship || Spiritual
Psychology || Spiritual
Time and Space || De
Hemelsche Leer Article || Theistic
Science || Discrete
Degrees: A Top Down Presentation (Ian Thompson)
Back
to the Index of Swedenborgian Marriage Handbook for Husbands
Back to
Glossary of Swedenborg Related Concepts
Back to Leon James Home
Page
Swedenborg
Home Page Hawaii
e-mail button
|