Scientific discovery of Spiritual Laws given in Rational Scientific Revelations


PREVIOUS PAGES

INDEX

 

DE HEMELSCHE LEER

 

         A MONTHLY MAGAZINE

DEVOTED TO THE DOCTRINE OF GENUINE TRUTH

  OUT OF THE LATIN WORD REVEALED FROM THE LORD

ORGAN OF THE GENERAL CHURCH

OF THE NEW JERUSALEM IN HOLLAND

EXTRACTS FORM THE ISSUES JUNE TO DECEMBER 1932

(ENGLISH TRANSLATION)

 

fourth facicle

 

 

LEADING THESES PROPOUNDED IN

"DE HEMELSCHE LEER."

 

  1.   The Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg are the Third Testament of the Word of the Lord. The DOCTRINE OF THE NEW JERUSALEM CONCERNING THE SACRED SCRIPTURE must be applied to the three Testaments alike.

 

  2.   The Latin Word without Doctrine is as a candlestick without light, and those who read the Latin Word without Doctrine, or who do not acquire for themselves a Doctrine from the Latin Word. are in darkness as to all truth (of. S. S. 50-61).

 

  3.   The genuine Doctrine of the Church is spiritual out of celestial origin, but not out of rational origin. The Lord is  that  Doctrine itself  (cf.  A.  C.  2496,  2497,  2510,  2516, 2533, 2859; A. E. 19).

 

3

DE HEMELSCHE LEER

  EXTRACT FROM THE ISSUE FOR. JUNE 193-2

 

FROM THE TRANSACTIONS OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

Extract from the minutes of the meeting of Saturday, April 11th 1931.

 

  The memorandum, calling this meeting together, reads as  follows:  Review  of  Mr.  Groenveld's  Address The Nineteenth of June 1930 (see Third Fascicle, pp. 3—8).

  REV. ERNST PFEIFFER gave the following elucidation of Mr, Groeneveld's address: The occasion for this address by Mr. Groeneveld was the celebration of the Nineteenth of June. The subject therefore is the coming into existence of the Church, that is. the coming into existence of those real things which, before the Lord, are the Church. If the essence of the Church is seen in spiritual light, it does not appear as an external organization in the world, but as a Man; and it is said of it and of the things which make it, that they are conceived and born, and that subsequently they pass through the ages of a man from the innocence of the ignorance of childhood to the innocence of the wisdom of old age.

  In this way it is seen in the spiritual sense that the Doctrine of the Church is conceived in the Church from the Lord and is born out of the Church. The New Church of the Lord which will be in the lands, and which is the New jerusalem, is represented by a Woman travailing in birth; the Doctrine of that Church by the male Son whom she bore; the travailing in birth signifies the difficult reception of that Doctrine, on account of the opposition of the proprium of man (cf. A.R. XII). it is indeed said in the literal sense of the APOCALYPSE  REVEALED:  "The Doctrine here meant is THE  DOCTRINE OF THE NEW JERUSALEM, published in London, 17,')8; as also THE

 

4           FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

DOCTRINES CONCERNING THE LORD. CONCERNING THE SACKED SCRIPTURE, AND CONCERNING LIFE ACCORDING TO THE COMMANDMENTS OF THE DECALOGUE. Amsterdam" (n. 543). In the literal sense thus of the APOCALYPSE REVEALED the difficult birth of the Latin Testament itself in  Swedenborg's  time  is  here  spoken  of,  but  that  this passage in the spiritual sense applies to the birth of the Doctrine in the Church, is evident to any one who understands the difference between the Word and the Doctrine of the Church. We read in the ARCANA CELESTIA: "He who does not know the arcana of Heaven. . . . supposes that the Word in the letter or the literal sense of the Word, is the Doctrine itself. . . . But the Doctrine must be collected out. of the Word, and while it is being collected, the man must be in enlightenment from the Lord" (n. 9424). The great significance of the difference between the Word of tile New Church, that is, the Latin Word, and the Doctrine of the New Church out of that Word, here clearly appears. If man is not open to the acknowledgement of this difference, the arcana of Heaven will not be accessible to him. The Word is given to the Church as the infinite and inexhaustible source of all truth, but its Doctrine, the Church as of itself must bring forth from the Word by the orderly means. The Doctrine is entirely such as the Church is;  the purer the Church,  the more interior its Doctrine, and also the reverse, the more interior the Doctrine the purer the Church. We read in the APOCALYPSE REVEALED: "Who does not know that the Church is not Church without Doctrine" (n. 97). That by the Doctrine here not the Latin Word is meant, but the Doctrine which the New Church as from itself makes for itself, is evident. So too in the following passages of the same work: "There are three things that make the Church, the truth of Doctrine, the good of Love, and Worship out of these" (n. 486). "The all of Religion consists in good, and the all of the Church in Doctrine, which must teach truths, and through truths good" (n. 675). "The Church is called Church out of Doctrine" (n. 923). And likewise in the ARCANA CELESTIA: "The Church is Church out of the Doctrine of truth and the Life of good" (n. 3305). In all these places by the Doctrine not the Word of I he Church but the Doctrine of the Church is meant, and hence it is evident of what great

 

 5        OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP       

 

significance  it  is that one  understands  the  difference between the Word and the Doctrine of the Church. It then becomes clear that in the spiritual sense by the travailing in birth of the Woman the difficult birth of the Doctrine in the Church is represented. It is by the spiritual sense that the truth of the literal sense of the Word. to which the former corresponds, may be seen in its essence, and it is thereby in no way destroyed. In what way the Dragonists out of the reformed Christian world from all sides, tried to prevent the coming into existence of the new Word (A.R. 543), has been described in many places in that Word. But as long as the thought of the New Church confines itself to this historical signification, it remains essentially a. natural thought, in spite of the spiritual subject; for it then confines itself to the form in which the spiritual is, but not to the essence or the spiritual itself. A spiritual thought concerning these things becomes possible only when the essence of the dragon is grasped as an abstract concept, and when afterwards one discerns it as being present in the New Church itself and in every member of that Church.

  The things from the Lord which make the Church are first formed as a. seed, as the rational. This seed is conceived in the affection for truth, and there for itself forms a body, which is borne in the body of the Church, The essence of those things is then felt as a general principle of truth. By the continuous influx of the Lord they are there developed invisibly. When the time of birth has come. these things clearly appear in their relation and application to all particulars of the good and truth of the Church, and then their great significance is fully seen. In this way the conception and the birth of the Doctrine of the Church in our Society are here spoken of. This may be elucidated and confirmed by what we read in n. 3671 of the ARCANA CELESTL\: "In the rational are the seeds, and the natural is  of service as a  soil".  This is the orderly way of the coming into existence of all genuine things of the Church. The things that make the Church thus are of purely Divine origin and purely Divine essence. Those are the "Divine things of the Church" that are spoken of in the Word (sec for instance D.F. 215). It here clearly appears that it is not possible to speak of the Divine things of the Church before in this wav they have been conceived and born in the

6           FROM THE TRANSACTION'S

 

Church. Without such a generation, which is Divine, there can be no question of the Divine things of the Church. The goods and truths of the Word as they are in themselves, are not the Divine things of the Church: for it is not the Word that makes the Church, but the understanding of the Word. But man's understanding of the Word cannot make the Church, unless it is from the Lord: the understanding out of the proprium cannot make the Church. 'Tt is the Divine of the Lord that makes the Church with man: for nothing can be considered as the Church but that which is the proprium of the Lord" (A.C. 2&66). That the Divine things of the Church are born out of the marriage between the Lord and the Church, is described in many places of the Word. So we read in n. ,307 of THE TRUE CHRISTIAN RELIGION: "By mother in the celestial sense is understood the Church. . . . By the New Jerusalem is understood the New Church which at this day is being established from the Lord. ... This Church, and not the preceding, is the Wife and Mother in this sense. The spiritual offspring which are born out of this marriage, are the goods of charity and the truths of faith; and those who are in these from the Lord, arc called sons of the wedding, sons of God, and born from Him".

  The things of the Church, conceived and born in such a way, are given to it as something that is of Divine essence and imperishable. In this way the truth has been conceived and born that the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg are the Word of the Lord. Any one who has part in this conception and birth knows that this is an imperishable Divine truth. In this way the concept of the Divinity of the Doctrine of the Church has been conceived and born; and all those who have part in this conception and birth feel that this also is a Divine truth.  A. truth of the Church not thus conceived and born, does not exist. For this reason the truths of the Church in the Old Testament are represented by the sons of Israel. But this is also the reason why for those outside the Church, who have no part in the conception and birth of its truths, it is difficult to see these truths.

  The faith in the possibility and reality of this Divine conception and birth of the things tha.t make the Church, opens the possibility and brings the reality of regeneration, and a vision of the Doctrine concerning the Holy Spirit.

 

7         OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP 

 

The sphere of the Holy Spirit is the sphere of the Divine things of the Church. It is not the Word that makes the Church, but the understanding of the Word; it is the Holy Spirit that makes the Church. By the Word alone without Doctrine out of the Word. no one comes into the essential things of the Word, which are the essential and really living things of the Church and the things of the Holy Spirit. The genuine Doctrine is from the Holy Spirit, and the Doctrine alone leads the Church into the sphere of the Holy Spirit. "By the Word of the Lord were the Heavens made, and all the Host of them by the Spirit of His Mouth" (Ps. 33 : 6). The Heavens were before the Angels were. So we read that it was once given to Swedenborg to sec the extent of the uninhabited Heaven (H.H. 419). The Heavens have been made by the Word, but the Angels, and therefore the goods and truths of the Church, have been made by the Spirit of the Mouth of the Lord; that is, by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit of the Mouth of the Lord is the Doctrine. The internal up building of the Church is only possible through the Doctrine.

  The comparison of the transition from the state of the Church where the literal sense of the Word itself is considered as the Doctrine, to the state where the Doctrine of the Church is seen as spiritual out of celestial origin, with the transition from the geocentric to the heliocentric system of the universe, is based on an actual correspondence. It is self-evident that such an important general revolution in the thought of the human race must have a spiritual sense; for the entire natural world and the entire history are a theatre representative of the Lord's Kingdom (cf. A.C. 300U, 3483, 3518. and many other places). This revolution corresponds to the state of the Church and of each member of the Church when they can pass over from the spiritual natural state to the essentially spiritual state itself. In the natural state, of which the proper essence is obedience, the thinking must entirely follow the letter. It is only the general truths that can be seen in this state. This may be confirmed hereby that. the great importance of a strictly literal  translation  of  each  separate  word  in  the  Third Testament, was not felt in the beginning of the Church. In the spiritual state, of which the proper essence is genuine charity or the love of truth for the sake of truth, it for

 

8           FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

the first time becomes clear to man that the letter of the Word indeed is the basis for the truth, but that genuine truth is always given in the internal man, who then can see the truth in the letter of the word . The essence of the thinking in the natural state is the natural rational; this rational is always bound to obedience to the letter, and this thinking must always follow the letter. The essence of the thinking in the spiritual state is the spiritual-rational; this rational for the first time sees the spiritual causes or the essence of truth, and henceforward all thinking no longer  follows  the  letter,  hut  the  letter  follows  the thinking (e.f. A.C. 1)124). But the power and the significance of the letter is in no way thereby destroyed or weakened: on the contrary, the letter thereby for the first time comes into its proper rights. For the letter as it is in itself contains indeed all genuine truths; hut the natural thinking sees nothing in it but the coarsest generalities, (and with regard to the particulars that lie hidden in the internal, it is in ignorance and even in fallacies. The Divine operation in the bringing forth of truth out of the Word is always dependent on. the development of the internal man. That, however, the letter in. the spiritual state -- where thus the thinking no longer follows the letter, but the letter follows the thinking -  is in no way put aside or even destroyed, appears clearly from this -that not until this state is the  great importance  seen  of a.  strictly  literal translation of each separate word in the Third Testament.

  It is according to order that the Church first must pass through a series of preparatory natural states, before -the spiritual state can commence, in which for the first time the Doctrine of the Church in its relation to the Word of the Church comes to the fore. hi all of those preparatory states it cannot be but •that the Church regards the Word itself of the Church as the Doctrine. Every Church from its beginning must as it were pass through all the states of the ages of a man, entirely as has been shown on a previous occasion (see  Third Fascicle, pp. 90---108) with regard to the history of the human race as a whole. Accordingly also in the history of the New Church a series of successive, states may be discerned, which entirely corresponds to the series of the great periods of the entire history of the human race. In the history- of the New Church too

 

9                      OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

there is as it were an Adamic state, which is the age of its infancy; a Noachic state, which is the age of its boyhood; a Hebrew and an Israielitish state, which is the age of its adolescence; a state of the Coming and Sensual Presence of the Lord. which is the age of its early manhood: a Christian state, which is the age of its manhood: and a state of the Second Coming of the Lord or a proper state of the, New Church itself, which is its old age. While, however. in the general series in all  periods  before  the  Coming of the Lord the basis for the thinking lay in the sensual things of creation, and in the period between the Coming and the Second Coming of the Lord it lay in the Divine Natural of the  New  Testament.  in  all  the  periods  of  the  particular series the basis for the thinking lies in the Divine Rational of the Third Testament. From this it is evident that; the Third. Testament in the first periods of the New Church plays a .role corresponding to the role which the sensual things of creation fulfilled in file ages before the Incarnation of the Lord. and subsequently a role corresponding to the role which the Divine Natural of the Divine Human of the Lord fulfilled in the (Christian age; and that this the Third Testament really only in the last period of the New Church, which is the period of the Second Coming of the Lord in the New Church, when the Church for the first time comes into the fullness of its proper state, will be able to fulfill that. role which fully agrees with its proper essence, as a result of which the Church for the first time  will  see  therein  the  proper  rational,  that  is. celestial truth.

  Every Church begins with a state of innocence of ignorance; this is the celestial state of its infancy. For all beginning of a man or of a. Church must be in the celestial of innocence. Tt is out of this celestial that in the course of its boyhood and adolescence it. must go forth, descending through the spiritual and the natural even into ultimates, in  order  there,  in  ultimates,  to  find  the  basis  for the independence which is necessary for adult age, in order afterwards thence, by a wrestling through the natural as from itself, again to climb up to the interior degrees, by which it arrives at the internal bases of truth and in its own spiritual and celestial state.

  The  characteristic of  the  successive  ages  of  infancy,

 

10                FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

boyhood, and adolescence, or as it were of the Adamic, Noachic.  Hebrew and  Israelitish periods,  in  the New Church, was that for all their thinking they were always entirely dependent on the direct cognizance of the letter of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg, exactly like all Churches before the Coming of the Lord in their thinking were always dependent on the sensual things of creation. Since in these successive states  —  with all those who actually had part in them --- the celestial, the spiritual, and the genuine natural successively were interiorly present, so through the direct cognizance of the writings an actual conjunction with the Lord was possible, which corresponds to the conjunction through the Human Divine of the Churches before the Coming of the Lord (cf. Third Fnsc., pp. 95-100).

  The characteristic of the Adamic state is the awe bordering on an overpowering of the man who for the first time sees himself placed before the fact of the Second Coming of the Lord. Man in this state is all admiration and adoration of the Lord, who has fulfilled His promised Second Coming. Intellectual problems for him in this state do not exist at all. He thinks it incomprehensible and wrong when he sees that the members of the Church give their attention to such problems. The Word of the New Church is for him a paradise. By the overpowering nature of this event the proprium is forced back for a considerable time. The all of this state is determined by the celestial which for this reason, thanks to his remains, can be given to him as it were as an unmerited advance, from which by direct cognizance he can see in tlie Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg the celestial truth of Ills spiritual infancy. As long as this state lasts he can be kept from the Lord in a state of innocence; but it is the innocence of infancy, and therefore the innocence of ignorance. Every man who as an adult comes to the Church and who is susceptible to the reality of the Second Coming of the Lord, first comes into such a state. The children of the New Church who are really kept in the living sphere of the (church, arc also in such a state. That the New Church in general after its first foundation was in such an Adamic state, the historian who would bring forward the internal things in the history of the Church, could show in the whole and in the particular things.

 

 11      OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

  It is only in the next state, which corresponds to the age of boyhood and the Noachic period, that a certain intellectual formation of the thinking takes place. Just as in the Golden Age creation itself was the Word, but in the subsequent period, when the celestial degree was closed, a written Word became necessary, so too in the Adamic state of the New Church the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg, as it were as a paradise, an' themselves the Word, in which man out of celestial good by direct cognizance sees truth; but in the. next, the Noachic, state, when man has left the celestial degree, the Writings are closed for him, unless a spiritual understanding is formed with him from the Lord out of the spiritual good which now, thanks to the remains of the preceding state, is given to him as an unmerited advance, and unless this understanding is developed by him, by which in the Writings he can see the spiritual truth of his spiritual boyhood. The development of this understanding can only take place by his applying to his life the truths of the Writings which he interiorly sees, that is, by his shunning evil. The more he, in the light he has, lives in spiritual charity, that is, the more he reduces the external with himself to obedience and thus to order, the stronger this spiritual understanding becomes out of the spiritual good, through which more and more in the Writings by direct cognizance he can see the spiritual truth. The characteristic of this state is thus — failing the celestial good of the preceding state which, without anything further made it possible for man to take direct cognizance of the truth — the intellectual investigation into the essence of the contents of the new Revelation and into the essence of the new Religion, in the light of the understanding which the Lord has formed out of the spiritual good with man and which can serve him as it were for a Word, whereby he will be able to see in the Writings of Swedenborg the truths which have reference to spiritual charity, just as a written Word had to be given to the Noachic man, if in the creation and in the things of their social life he were to see the spiritual truth. But in this state the thinking remains limited to the most general concepts of the Divine things which make Religion and the Church, such as man requires them for this spiritual state of an as it were Noachic charity, and such as they may be

 

12              FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

acquired out of the advance of spiritual good, by direct cognizance of the letter of the Writings, in the light of that formed and developed understanding. The thinking in this state is never able, independently of the letter, to arrive at a concept of the truth in its particulars such as it refers to the particular essence of the Three Testaments, and to the particular states of the existing Church and of the mail of the Church. The all of this state is determined by the fact that then, thanks to the remains of the preceding state, the spiritual degree has been opened as it  were  by way of an unmerited advance,  such  as in the preceding state was the case even with the celestial degree; and that out of this spiritual good, thanks to the fact that man shuns evil. by the application of spiritual truths to the life of the external man, the understanding for spiritual truth is developed.

  In the next state, which corresponds to the first age of adolescence and the Hebrew period, man has left also the spiritual degree. The all of this state is determined by the genuine natural good which is now given to man thanks to the remains of the preceding states as it were as an unmerited advance, and by the necessity that now from the Lord out of that natural good a certain understanding for natural truth be formed, which is developed by man, thanks to the fact that he continues to shun evil by the application of natural truths to the life of the external man. Out of the natural good, in the light of that understanding. man sees genuine natural cognitions in the letter of the Writings, which essentially refer to the natural life of the Church and of the man of the Church. The essence of the up building of the Church in this state is seen in the gathering of as many as possible of such cognitions as being necessary for the natural life, and in the multiplication and extension thereof by their application to the exposition of the Old and the New Testament. The interior essence of Religion and of the Church in this state is seen in the good of genuine natural charity. Also the great attention then given by the Church to external evangelization is characteristic of this state. It was that period in the New Church when a remarkably great extension of its members took place in England and in America. From this it may also lie evident that it seems to be a very one-sided view

 

 13                OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

if the slight results of missionary work in our times are attributed essentially to the deterioration of the world, therefore to a change of the state of the world, instead of to a change of the state of the Church.

  The state of the age of adolescence, which first corresponds to the Hebrew period, later on pastes over into a state corresponding to the Israelitish period. In this state is the  lowest point of  the  descending or outward going line of the successive ages; and such a state is unavoidable. since it is only there that the sensual Coming of the Lord and thereby the inversion to the ages of ascent and of the return into the interiors can take place. In this state man has left also the interior natural which in the Hebrew state was given to him as an unmerited advance. The states of such an advance are now past. since all possibilities thereto have successively been exhausted. The characteristic. of this state is that man considers himself strictly bound to the letter of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg. similarly as the Israelites were strictly bound to the letter of the Old Testament; and the all of the essence of that state in its favorable sense is a strict external obedience to that letter, while all the weight is put upon an external holiness, even to corporeal and sensual things. The end in view in that state is the transition to the age of early manhood, in which man arrives at the adult state and therefore for the first time comes as it were to stand on his own feet. For in all the preceding ages there was always an absolute dependence on a direct or sensual taking cognizance of the letter, without which man never was capable of any orderly thinking in the things of the Word. The beginning of early manhood for the first time brings such an independence, which can only be made possible by the Coining of the Lord at the end of the Israelitish state.

  But before the Coming of the Lord can take place, man in the Israelitish state first passes through serious trials and dangers. The essence of all the states before the Coming of the Lord is that man out of a state of good which is given to him as it were as an unmerited advance — namely successively the Adamic celestial good, the Noachic spiritual good, and the Hebrew natural good — by taking direct cognizance is made capable of an orderly but external vision of the truth in the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg;

 

14            FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

entirely as all the historic Churches before the Coming of the Lord out of the good of their respective degrees by direct cognizance were in truth, but not in the actual, internal truth, but only in representative, external truth (cf. T1iird Fascicle, pp.95-99). The essence, however, of all states after the Coming of the Lord is that man, after taking direct cognizance of the letter of the Latin Word, by the wrestling through his own natural should arrive at one of the interior degrees of truth — namely successively at the interior natural, the exterior rational, and the interior rational. For only by the wrestling through the natural can the external man be united with the internal man, and the Human of the letter in man be conjoined with the Divine, and only by this conjunction does the Third Testament in man become the Word and thus tlie Divine Human which in man makes the Church. For the Word in itself is indeed always the Word; but in man the Word is not the Word until it is seen from the living Lord Himself (cf.  S.S.  76—-79).  With  the  man  in  whom  the  external man is not conjoined with the internal man by the wrestling through the natural, the human of the letter will be separated from the Divine in the letter.

  The end in view of the wrestling with the proprium or the shunning of evil in the states before the Coming of the Lord is to be in the good which is given as an advance; for out of that good there is direct cognizance of truth. The end of the. wrestling with the proprium or the shunning of evil in the states after the Coming of the Lord is to enter into one of the interior degrees of truth; for only through the interior degrees of truth does man come into the good of the Divine Human which in man makes the Church; for the interior truth is one with good, as the Son and the Father are one. In the states before the Coming the end in view of the endeavor lies in good, for truth afterwards follows of itself; in the states after the Coming of the Lord the end in view of the endeavor lies in the genuine internal truth, for the genuine good of the Divine Human lies just in that truth. The states before the Coming of the Lord are as it were states of the Human Divine, for thc:y perfectly correspond to the states of the human race before the Incarnation of the Lord; the states after the Coming of the Lord for the first time in the full sense

 

15                OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

are states of the Divine Human of the Lord, and they correspond to the states of the human race after the Incarnation of the Lord. Now the entire essence of the Israelitish state and the necessity of such a state arise, from the fact that only in such a state the transition from the states before the Coming to the states after the Coming, or the transition from the descending or outward going development of man to the ascending or inward going development, can take place. An advance of one of the interior degrees of good in this state is no longer given. The all of this state depends on whether man, according to the scientifics which he has out of the letter, continues to shun the evils of  the  proprium  and  thereby  is  enabled  to  continue to have faith in the Divinity of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg.

  If man in tills Israelitish state perseveres in the combat against his proprium, then, when the time has come, the Coming of the Lord in him will take place. The Coming of the Lord in this state is made possible because in the long run it proves impossible for man to maintain himself in the external holiness which characterizes the Israelitish state. He gradually sees all those things to which he first attached so much importance, since in them he saw the essence of Religion, fall away from him. And this gradually more and more, until at last he stands deprived of all foothold and nothing else remains than the affection for truth. It is in this affection for truth, as it were as in a Virgin Mary, that the Coming of the Lord is effected. This Coming consists in this that man now recognizes that the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg as to their letter are the Word itself for the New Church. Then the Lord Himself in His Divine Human is present with the man of the New Church for the first time in a sensual way, just as the Lord was present before the senses of His disciples. Then on the basis of the-Divine Human that is seen in the letter of the Third Testament, the wrestling through the natural and thereby the ascending to the interior degrees of truth can begin.

  But if man in the Israelitish state does not shun evil, and consequently the proprium more and more gains the upper-hand, there never will be such a development with him as will make possible the Coming of the Lord, and

 

16                            FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

in such a case it cannot be but that he will gradually regard the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg as purely human, and will seek the entire weight of the Divine Revelation exclusively in the Old and the New Testament. For in this state there is no longer any question of a good out of advance, out of which good in the preceding states the Divinity of the Writings could interiorly be felt; while the acknowledgement of the Old and the New Testament does not require such a combat against the proprium, since this  acknowledgement  belongs  to  the  generally  ruling tradition of the Church and is easily compatible with the merely external piety in which such a man lives.

  It is clear that the concept-like problem whether the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg as to their letter are or are not the Word, presents itself for the first time in the Israelitish state, namely through the Coming of the Lord. This was the time when, in the general bodies of the Church in America and in England, small minorities formed who saw themselves obliged to defend their faith in the Divinity of the Writings over against the ever extending unbelief of the majorities. In the New Church the denial, based on argumentation, of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg as the Divine Human of the Lord, or as the Word, is in complete correspondence with the rejection of the Lord by the Jews during His Sensual Presence on earth. Just as the Jews then turned away from the genuine Divine, which thenceforward could be found in the Lord alone, and sought the essence of religion in a merely external and therefore idolatrous worship of the Old Testament, so the majority in the New Church turned away from the Divine Human, which thenceforward could be found only in the Third Testament, and sought the essence of the Word, that is, the Divine Human, in an external worship of the Old and the New Testament. The Third Testament as the means of salvation then recedes entirely into the back-ground; the Old and the New Testament alone are acknowledged as the means of salvation. But the New Church can only come into existence and remain in existence in the measure in which the faith in the Divinity of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg remains alive. For therein is the Divine Human of the Lord from which alone the Church can be built up. In the states of the New Church corresponding to the states

 

17                OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

of the Churches before the Coming of the Lord, for all genuine members of the Church the interior faith in the Divinity of those Writings, out of the good out of advance in which they were, was self-evident, except in the Israelitish state where everything depends on a conscious choice between acceptance and rejection, and the rejection signifies nothing less than a rejection of the Lord who has now fulfilled His Sensual Coming, and thus of the Divine Human itself.

  In the Adamic, the Noachic, and the Hebrew state, or what is the same, in the ages of infancy, boyhood, and the first years of adolescence, the essence of the relation of the Church to the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg lay in an interior realization of their Divinity. In the Israelitish state, on the contrary, or in the later years of adolescence, the weight no longer is in the interior realization of the Divinity of the Writings, but the problem now is the essence of their letter. Therefore also with those who in this state persevere in the combat with the proprium, the Coming of the Lord takes place in lasts. But out of the essence of this state the Church is placed before a difficulty, which for a long time adheres to it. Since in this state the essence of the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg cannot possibly be seen in their internal, but is seen only in the letter, the three Testaments then lie before man as it were next to each other on the same plane. That the discrete degrees of truth can never exist anywhere else than in the living spirit, thus in the living man alone, man in this state cannot see. And so it happens that he places the discrete degrees of truth into the letter of the series of the three Testaments lying next to each other before his eyes. Thence comes the idea that each of the Testaments as to its letter is destined for a certain province of the mind, namely the letter of the Old Testament for the sensual mind, the letter of the New Testament for the natural mind, and the letter of the Third Testament for the rational mind; that thus the Third Testament is destined only for the rational mind. That the letter of each of the three Testaments is destined for the sensual man, since in the New Church also, regeneration begins with the lowest degree, further that the rational degree itself can only be attained the very last, after the wrestling through the natural,

 

18                    FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

and moreover that the rational in a certain way is present also in the Old and the New Testament, since without the rational there never is a human, man in this state does not realize. The position that the exegesis of the different successive Testaments must take into account the fact of their being addressed to different provinces of the mind, and that consequently there can be no question of an application  of the law of correspondence between the discrete degrees of truth to the Third Testament, and that thus the DOCTRINE CONCERNING THE SACRED SCRIPTURE cannot be applied to the Third Testament without difference or reserve, is based on an idea which finds its origin in this difficulty, arising in this state.

  The essence of the next state of the New Church, which corresponds to the Coming and Sensual Presence of the Lord on earth, lies in this that the Church begins to see and to acknowledge that the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg are the Word itself for the New Church. It is the fundamental truth of the Gospel that in the Lord Jesus Christ, Jehovah God Himself came on earth, that thus the Lord is the Father and not a Son from the eternal. So it is the characteristic of this state that the Church acknowledges that in the Third Testament the Human and the Divine are one, that thus the Writings of Emanuel Swedenborg are Divine even into the letter, and that there alone redemption and salvation are to be found, and the essential things for the up building of the Church and for the conjunction with the Lord. Nevertheless in this state the Church is not conscious in a concept-like way of these facts; it is the time when the Writings from principle are acknowledged as the Word, wherby the separation of the majorities of the preceding state, who deny the Divinity of the Writings, becomes complete.

  This state is the state of the early manhood of the New Church. The end in view of this state is that man by the wrestling through the natural shall arrive at the interior natural, and thus at the first degree of internal truth. In the Word of the Third Testament, as it is in itself, the Human and the Divine are one. But if the Word is taken up by the natural man by direct cognizance, the Human of the Word, the letter, in man is not yet conjoined with the the Divine.  As long as this conjunction has not yet taken

 

19                OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

place, the Word with man therefore is not the Word. It is only after the wrestling through the natural, by which man's proprium is overcome and forced back, that in man the Human of the Word is conjoined with the Divine, so that the Word with him is really the Word. The genuine essence of the state of early manhood thus consists in this, that by the wrestling through the natural in the first degree, the natural truth of the letter of the Word is conjoined with the interior natural, and thence the human with the Divine; just as the disciples during the Sensual Presence of the Lord on earth by the wrestling with their proprium were able to follow the Lord, and acknowledged that He was the Christ, the Son of the living God. That the majority of the others could not see this had its cause in nothing but the fact that there was no wrestling with the proprium.

  The end in view in this state is that man be prepared for the transition to the next state. The essence of the next state,  which  corresponds  to  the  state  of  the  Christian Church and is the period of manhood, is the development of the Doctrine independently of the sensual presence of the letter, just as the Lord had to leave the earth, if the pouring out of the Holy Spirit were to become possible (John 16 : 7, 13). But before this transition can take place again two dangers present themselves, which as great difficulties for a long time adhere to the Church. Man in the ascending state can arrive at the genuine truth of the Third Testament in no other way than by the wrestling through the natural, by which the Human of the letter in man is conjoined with the Divine. If man will not realize the necessity of such a wrestling, then, according to his tendency towards the Protestant or the Roman-Catholic disposition (cf. A.R. 387), he will attribute to the letter of the Latin Word by itself either the proper Divine essence itself, or the genuine Human essence itself. In the first case the man says that the literal sense of the Third Testament is  the  proper  spiritual  sense  itself;  in  the  second  case the man says that the literal sense of the Third Testament, such as it has been taken up by direct cognizance, is the proper rational itself. Both these ideas are the result of the fact that it is not realized that before regeneration the direct cognizance of the letter can never lead to the posses-

 

 

20             FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

sion of genuine truth, since thereby the proprium always plays a certain role; and that therefore after taking cognizance a wrestling through the natural must always first take place, by which the external man is conjoined with the internal man, so that the man for the first time sees the genuine truth in the Latin Word, in which the Human is one with the Divine.

  The first idea, namely, that by direct cognizance of the letter of the Third Testament one has to do with the spiritual sense itself, places the Divine, that is the spiritual sense itself, in the letter such as it is with man. The Divine is indeed in the letter itself, but only such as this is in itself, that is, in the Lord, since the Lord by the wrestling with and the victory over the hells has conjoined the Human with the Divine. So too in the Third Testament, as it is in itself, the Human is conjoined with the Divine. But in man the Human of the letter is only conjoined with the Divine after the wrestling through the natural. Thus by saying that the letter without the wrestling through the natural in man is the spiritual sense itself, thus the Divine, there is, as it were, a belief in a Divine Son from the eternal, instead of in a human Son who has become Divine by Glorification. The essential defect of this idea is  here  clearly  evident  as  being  the  aversion  from  the wrestling through the natural, and thereby the interior essence thereof betrays itself as being the same as the protestant error of faith alone. Just as the First Coming of the Lord by itself brought no redemption unless man as from himself fulfilled the  conditions pertaining to redemption, so too the Second Coming of the Lord by itself brings no redemption unless man according to order cooperates as from himself.

  The second idea, namely that the Third Testament is a Revelation of the rational, so that man upon direct cognizance of the letter has to do with the proper rational itself, places the proper Human in the letter by itself, while yet the genuine Human can never exist anywhere else than in its unity with the Divine. The conjunction with the Divine, however, exists in man only after the wrestling through the natural. The letter of the Third Testament, as it is in itself, that is in the Lord Himself, is indeed one with the Divine, and thus the proper Divine Rational itself, but

 

21                    OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

never as it is in man by direct cognizance. The Rational of the letter with man, upon direct cognizance, becomes the sensual- or exterior-natural; and just as to the Lord after His birth from the Virgin Mary there adhered the human of Mary, which human He had to put off by the Glorification, so to the man in this state, although the Lord has now been born in him from his affection for the letter of the Third Testament — which affection corresponds to Mary — there adheres a human that is only capable of a natural-rational vision of the Third Testament. It is this human which man by wrestling through the natural must remove. Thus by saying that by the direct reading of the Third Testament, that is, by direct cognizance, a taking up of the proper rational itself is possible, the necessity is denied of the opening of the interior degrees of the mind, which can only take place through regeneration, and by which alone the Word can be seen from within. In this conception the characteristic of the Roman Catholic disposition clearly shows, namely the lust of dominion out of the external authority of a separated letter — a vicar of Christ as it were — while the genuine freedom of man, existing in an internal enlightenment from the Lord by the opening of the internal degrees of the mind, is laid in bonds.

  Both these ideas have their origin in nothing but the instinctive aversion of the proprium of man from a wrestling through the natural, since the proprium there clearly feels its downfall. Both ideas seek salvation in the sole letter in itself: the former considers that letter as the proper Divine itself, namely as the spiritual sense itself; the latter considers the letter as the proper and genuine Human itself, namely as the proper and genuine rational itself. It is especially in the next state of the  Church, which is the period of the development of the Doctrine of the Church, that these two ideas come to light as essential contrasts with the Doctrine. For the genuine Doctrine of the Church is nothing but the proper and genuine spirit of the Word itself, in which the Human and the Divine are one, as the Son and the Father are one. It is given according to order in the internal man, after the external man by the wrestling through the natural has been conjoined with the internal man.

 

22                 FROM THE TRANSACTIONS

 

  The next state of the New Church, which corresponds to the Christian period and to the age of manhood, brings the development of the Doctrine of the Church. This state is to be compared with the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, which indeed characterizes the Christian Church. Just as the Lord had to leave the 'earth, if this pouring out were to become possible, so the Church must leave the letter of the Third Testament in the realization that within the letter by way of correspondence all the infinite particulars of the proper, abstract, spiritual truth lie hidden. The leading principle determining the Church's attitude in this state is the thesis that the DOCTRINE CONCERNING THE SACRED SCRIPTURE must also be applied to the Third Testament, and it is then seen that the up building of the Church is possible only through the Doctrine of the Church. The letter by itself brings to man only the generals of truth. The letter in itself is of such a nature, purely Divine and infinite, that from it into eternity ever new particulars of truth may be drawn. This drawing of the particulars of genuine spiritual truth is the task of the New Church in this state. The proper essence thereof lies in the masculine which has entered upon the combat with the natural in a more interior, the second, degree, and which thereby is in the genuine spiritual rational, which sees the genuine spiritual sense of the Word. The New Church in this state is for the first time a genuine spiritual Church.

  In all these successive states of the New Church, however, from the beginning, the proper and essential state of the New Church itself is present. The proper state itself of the New Church is its celestial state, the old age of the human race, in which the celestial seed of its truth, the celestial Doctrine, is conceived as an immediate revelation from the Lord. It is the end of the creation of this earth that this become the essential state of the human race, with which too the Paradise itself will return to this earth, since in this state the influx from the Lord can take place from the inmost to the outermost, by which the general order of all things will be restored. But even from the first beginning of the New Church this state is present as the proper source of its entire being. All truths that are essentially new and belong essentially to the New Church, from the beginning were of such a celestial origin. The successive

 

23                            OF THE SWEDENBORG GEZELSCHAP

 

states described above are not possible unless such interior rational or celestial seeds of truth precede, from which those successive states in the Church are developed, comparatively as the things coming forth from a seed.

 

25

DE HEMELSCHE LEER

 EXTRACTS FROM THE TSRTTE FOR JULY 1932

 

 THE NINETEENTH OF JUNE 1932

 

    Address by the Reverend Ernst Pfeiffer.

 

  There were 46 persons present on Sunday evening for the celebration of the Nineteenth of June.

  The Rev. Pfeiffer welcomed those present and asked them on that evening to try and enter into the spirit of the things that essentially make the New Church, and to give their attention to a few of the most important of the new principles that in the past year from the Lord have been given to the Church, as leading truths for the up building of the Church.

  It is gradually becoming clear to us that the Church is a Divine institution, and that to it from the Lord is given a certain Divine power and a certain Divine doctrinal authority, and that the salvation for man and for the human race can be found only in the Church. This is a truth which indeed as early as the beginning of the Christian church, which out of the loves of self sought the essence of religion merely in external things, became a profane falsity; but which in the New Church, in the measure in which by the victory over the proprium it will come from the Lord into the internal things, will become a living reality. This truth is openly taught in the Latin Word with the explicit words: "Every one with whom the Church is, will be saved, but every one with whom the Church is not, will be condemned" (A.C. 10766). The abuse of this truth out of the love of dominion in the Christian church has indeed led to spiritual slavery and thereby to the destruction of all internal things, but on the other hand only the insight into the genuine essence of this truth and a life according thereto will be able to lead the human race to the victory over the proprium and thereby into genuine freedom.

 

26                     THE NINETEENTH OF JUNE 1932

 

  We now begin to see the Church as an actual spiritual being, as a Man before the Lord, and we now begin to understand why the Church is called the Bride and the Wife of the Lamb.

  In the Third Testament the Lord Himself is present in His Divine Human. When the Church begins with man, then this Word lies outside of him before his corporeal eyes, and in a very general way it is seen and accepted by him as a Divine Revelation. But it is only recently that we have begun to understand what heavy responsibility for man this event brings with itself. This Word that lies without, in the form of books before the man, cannot possibly become the Word within man, unless it be conceived and born in him from the internal; otherwise that Word, which in itself is indeed the Word, with man is not the Word. It is also evident that all that is said in the Apocalypse concerning the Divine things of the Holy City, the New Jerusalem, in the natural world can only become a reality in the measure in which the Lord Himself is born in the Church, that is, in the human minds, thus in the measure in which the men of the Church are regenerated from the Lord.

  Just as the Christian church believed that the Lord with His Coming had brought an active redemption, so too in the New Church the danger exists that one should see the  redemption  and  salvation  merely  in  the  external things of the new Word, while, however, the Divine things of the Church must be born from the internal. We have learned to understand that all the evils and falsities which have destroyed the former churches, and which are described in the Third Testament, are also present and active in the New Church. The natural sense of the Third Testament indeed treats of the former churches, but the spiritual sense treats of good and truth, and of evil and falsity, in themselves; and for this reason all those places in the Third Testament which in the letter treat of the former churches,  in their particulars  and  later even in their singulars, must be seen in application to the New Church; in the spiritual sense in the particulars and in the celestial sense in the singulars.

  Rev. Pfeiffer then requested attention for what a year ago, on the Nineteenth of June 1931, Mr. Groeneveld had

 

27                        REVEREND ERNST PFEIFFER

 

told us about the essence of the Church as a Man, namely that the Church, like a man, has a soul, a spirit, and a body. When things of this kind are for the first time expressed, they seem so subtile, and they are so hidden and so difficult to grasp that for a long time they pass by man's conception. Only after a considerable time they take on a certain form. It is at present one of the most important things for the development of the thought in our Society to arrive at clear concepts with regard to the Church as a Man, with a soul, a spirit and a body.

  That which is actually the Church cannot be born with man unless out of the affection for truth, and indeed the affection for the definite truth present in this world, that is,  the truth in the Word  in  lasts;  in  the  New  Church therefore the affection for the Third Testament. It is the love for the Third Testament, the entire devotion of all our thought to that Testament, out of the interior conviction that it is the Divine Human of the Lord or the Divine Truth itself, and thus the sole source of truth, and that from anywhere else absolutely nothing is to be expected. This affection for the Third Testament is as it were the Virgin Mary, from which the Lord is born in the Church. If therefore the church is really Church, this is only possible because the Lord Himself is' born in it out of the affection for the Third Testament, and the Lord alone makes the entire being of the Church, as a Man, from firsts to lasts, from the soul to the body. Only if a man has that affection will it be possible for the Lord to be born in him, and for him to become a living member of the Church. This affection for the Third Testament in the Church will always play one of the most important parts. It is as it were the Church as the mother of all the Divine things of the Church. Only in this affection are we within the borders of the Church; even so much so that one can say that in the measure in which man does not entirely draw his thought out of the Third Testament alone, he still stands without the Church. The proprium ever anew leads man away; and man deceives himself if he fancies that he is in the light of the Word, when he has the things of the world as the basis for his thought and then only allows the light which he believes he has from the Word, to fall thereon; for in this way the light of the

 

28                    THE NINETEENTH OF JUNE 1932

 

Word is falsified. Into the true light of the Word man can only enter in the measure in which he withdraws his heart entirely from the world and directs his eyes only to within, being in the affection for the Third Testament alone. Those especially who have strong natural faculties, a strong memory, a strong imagination, and a strong natural rational,  more than others  are in this danger, namely of seeking the basis for their thought without, not realizing that all truth lies within, in the hidden treasuries of the Word, and that all that comes from outside of it can never be anything else but fallacy.

  There are two essential loves which precede all coming into existence of the Divine things of the Church; the one love is in the internal man, the other love is in the external man. The love in the internal man is as it were the father of those things, and the love in the external man is as it ware the mother of; those 'things. The love in the internal man is the soul out of which they are conceived, and the love in the external man is the body in which they are borne and out of which they are born. What that love is in the external man, we have already seen, namely, the love for the Third Testament as the only source of truth. It is a love in the external man, since it is directed to an object which is present in lasts before our senses. But what is the love in the internal man, from which as from a father and as out of a soul the Divine things of the Church are conceived? It is the genuine general love for truth, in which love the Lord Himself with man is present in the internal man. This is thus not the love for the truth of the Third Testament, present in lasts; for this love is a love of the external man. The love or the good in the internal man, which makes that soul — for good makes the soul (cf. CANONS, Concerning the Lord Saviour, 4 : 6),—is, so to say, the general goodness of the internal man, or, so to say, the general internal well-disposedness of the man. Even before any. one comes into contact with the Third Testament, this well-disposedness is with the man; with some it is stronger,  with  others  it is less strong. It is that love by which for the one the eyes are opened for the Third Testament, while for the other, who has not this love, they remain closed. It is the love for truth for the sake of truth, for the sake of which love the man is ready to put aside the 

  29                REVEREND ERNST PFEIFFER

 

loves of the proprium, to take up the wrestling through the natural, and to shun evil and falsity as sin against the Lord (cf. DE HEMELSCHE LEER, Third Fascicle, p. 45). This genuine love for truth for the sake of truth in the Church takes the form of an entire devotion to the Divine things of the Church, that is, to the spiritual principles by which the Church can come into existence, or to those things that make possible the regeneration of man himself; for truth is the neighbor, and the neighbor in the spiritual sense is the Church.

  Only where these two loves rule, the one as a soul in the internal man and the other as a body in the external man, can that celestial marriage come into existence in man, from which all Divine things of the Church are born. Both loves are from the Lord alone; the love in the internal man is as a burning fire, the source of all life in the man as a Church;  the  love in  the  external  man is  a  complete devotion to the Word of the Third Testament as the sole source of all truth; but to this love, just as to the Virgin Mary, all the evil and falsity of the love of self and of the world adhere. For as soon as ever an object is given in the natural, which is accessible to the senses, and to which a love is directed, the proprium also is there at once, trying to find access to that object through those same senses. No love in the Church can come into existence which directs itself to an object that is accessible in lasts, but the danger is there of the proprium in a very hidden way interfering with it.

  If the man who from love for the truth for the sake of truth is in the love for the Third Testament, in the light which he has, wrestles in the natural with the proprium, and puts aside everything which he recognizes to be impure, then in that love there forms, as it were as in a body, something that can conceive the seed of the Divine things of the Church. The soul in the internal man which is of the  Lord alone,  descends  as  a seed,  as  the love  clothes itself in the rational with a tender body, from which the Holy Spirit proceeds in the Church. Thus the Divine things which make the Church are conceived in the Church itself from the marriage of the Lord with the Church. All Divine things of the Church which in such a wav have been conceived and afterwards born, are in them-

 

30                THE NINETEENTH OF TUNE 193

 

selves again as it were a Church in small, with a soul, a spirit, and a body.

  In the first time after the birth it is especially the soul which leads the Church, since the spirit is as yet only present in germ. The Church in this state is first as a tender child which is led by the intuition which flows in from the Lord, without conscious exertion of the intellectual faculties. The love in the internal man makes the soul, the loves in the external man make the body. To this body, or to these loves in the external man, likewise evil and falsity adhere, just as this was the case with the body from which they are born. In the beginning this inherited evil and falsity scarcely assert themselves. The characteristic of these first states is a spontaneous devotion to the things of the Word and of the Church; but it soon appears that this is only a childlike and external state. The necessity will now appear for the development of the spirit of the Church, which for the first time is the essential ecclesiastical state.

  The state of the spirit of the Church is essentially the state of the development of the Doctrine. It is manifest that the childlike natural state, when it is the soul which leads spontaneously, cannot in the long run maintain itself, since the proprium has not yet been overcome. The proprium will soon endeavor to rise up and to lay its hand on the things of the Third Testament and of the Church, which are present in the external man. For to Mary and to that which is born out of her, the proprium adheres.

  When the proprium thus begins to show itself in that body, that is, in the loves of the external man, then at once the important task of the spirit of the Church appears, namely by the opening of the internal sense of the Third Testament to bring to light those truths which have reference to that proprium. The Church, in this state, begins to see that all the descriptions of the evil and falsity that have destroyed the former churches, in the particulars of the internal sense are of application to itself, since all that evil and falsity are also present in her. Just to take one example: With the description of the dragon one never again will think of the forms of "faith alone" which has ruined the protestant churches, but one will begin to see the evil in the New Church which in the internal sense  

 

31                 REVEREND ERNST PFEIFFER

 

is meant by the dragon. Concerning the dragon we read in the MEMORABILIA, n. 5961: "They all are dragons who confirm falsities by the Word. ... Its tail are they who only read the Word, and place salvation therein, and who are not in any Doctrine, saying that the Word in the letter is the Doctrine; but thus they can defend whatever they wish", etc. That here by the Word the Third Testament is meant, and by the Doctrine, the Doctrine which from the Lord is born in the Church, is evident.

  The spirit of the Church is developed only when the Church has reached its adult state. This development depends entirely upon whether the Church in the external man overcomes the evils that have come to light and thus removes the proprium. By this cleansing of the body the spirit of the Church as it were is given space for further development. Everything then depends upon whether the Church applies itself to a further opening of the Word. The new interior light that is thus given in the spirit, in the body brings the opportunity for new evils to come forth which before were not active. A new purification thereby becomes possible, and thereby again more space is given for the development of the spirit of the Church.

  So we have a manifest reciprocal action between the spirit of the Church and the body, in the measure in which the letter to the Third Testament is opened more, and a more interior light falls upon the body, and in the measure in which afterwards the body is cleansed by the wrestling with the proprium in this new light. It is this reciprocal action which alone can bring the true interior up building of the Church, a Church which is truly Church, with a soul, a spirit, and a body from the Lord alone.

 

       Address by H. D. G. Groeneveld.

 

  This day is the commemoration of the Second Coming of the Lord and of the foundation of the New Church. We are seized with great fear when we realize that the Lord is again on earth with the human race. The Lord is now present in His Divine Human. In THE TRUE CHRISTIAN RELIGION, n. 30, we read: "'God is, after the World was made, in space without space, and in time without time".  The Lord therefore in the Third Testament is

 

32             THE NINETEENTH OF JUNE 1932

 

present in the literal sense but not in the natural appearance of that sense. The Third Testament therefore should be approached not with a natural thought but with a spiritual thought deriving nothing from space and time.

  The Lord is Love itself and Wisdom itself. Since Love has power only through Wisdom, the Lord as to Wisdom has come again in the Third Testament, as the esse for the existere of the conjunction with the human race. It is this esse which spiritually into eternity has the substance for the New Church established from the Lord. It is in this substance alone that the conjunction of the Lord with the human race can take place, for which reason it is represented by a bride, as appears from the second Verse of chapter XXI of the Apocalypse; "And I John saw the holy city, the new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband".

  It is  the  Church in time which always after having brought to existence the substance of the esse of the conjunction, given it, must prepare itself for the reception of a new substance for a more interior conjunction with t-he Lord. Then the Church comes into the essence of the Third Testament, and the Church in time is the bride with which the Lord conjoins Himself again. By the deeper wisdom given to it the Lord then has power to combat the more interior evils and falsities and to bring redemption. That the conjunction of the Church with the Lord takes place when it prepares itself as a bride and that »it then represents wisdom, appears from the work on CONJUGIAL LOVE, where in n. 21 the signification of a wedding in Heaven is described.

  We read there as follows: "And one out of the men of the wedding, a wise one, said: Do you understand what the things which you have seen signify? They said it was little; and then they asked him why the bridegroom, now a husband, was in such a dress? He answered that the bridegroom, now a husband, represented the Lord, and the bride, now a wife, represented the Church, because a wedding in Heaven represents the marriage of the Lord with the Church. Hence it is that on his head there was a mitre and that he was dressed in a cloak, a tunic, and an ephod, like Aharon; and that on the head of the bride, now a wife, there was a crown, and that she was dressed with

 

33                        H. D. G. GROENEVELD

 

a robe like a queen; but to-morrow they will be clothed differently, because this representation lasts only to-day. They asked again: Since he represented the Lord, and she the Church, why did she sit at his right hand? The wise one replied: Because there are two things which make the marriage of the Lord and the Church, love and wisdom; the Lord is love and the Church is wisdom; and wisdom is at the right hand of love. For the man of the Church is wise as from himself, and in proportion as he is wise he takes up love from the Lord. The right hand also signifies power;  and  love has  power through wisdom. But as has been said, after the wedding the representation is changed; for then the husband represents wisdom, and -the wife the love of his wisdom. This love, however, is not the prior love, but it is a secondary love, which the wife has from the Lord through the wisdom of the husband. The love of the Lord, which is the prior love, is the love of being wise with the husband; wherefore after the wedding, both together, the husband and his wife, represent the Church".

  The Church therefore is in the state of the bride when it  takes  up  wisdom  from  the  Lord.  It  is  the  state  in -which the essence of the Doctrine of the Church as the spiritual out of celestial origin, is revealed to it. After the fullness of the state in which this spiritual out of celestial origin is given to it, the Church is no longer the bride or the wisdom of the Lord. Husband and wife, or wisdom and love, or understanding and will, together form the Church, and the conjunction of the Church with the Lord is now dependent on the marriage of those two. It is the husband or the love for the truth of the wisdom of the Third Testament, given to the Church, which is now the prior love and the wife or the love for the spiritual truth the secondary love. It is the state in which the wisdom given to the Church must be brought into the will.

  The Lord operates from firsts through lasts. The conjunction with the Lord thus is only possible and therefore is entirely determined by the application of the new truths of the Third Testament in the outermost of our natural life or in our sensual life. All our thoughts and all our acts must have the new things of the Church as their essence. All lusts of the proprium in which we live must

 

34                THE NINETEENTH OF JUNE 1932

 

be put aside and the things in the natural world by themselves, and the desires for them, must come to be regarded as not of essential use. All things in the outermost of our natural life from love to the Lord should be put into order by our will, in order that thus we form a foundation on which with the new truths the life in the Lord can be built up. It is in the affection for bringing the spiritual things into our will in the outermost of our natural life that the conjugial sphere flows in from the Lord. It is in this life alone that conjugial love is present and only there lie the peace, the blessedness, and the delight of a life in the things of the Lord. Ever greater will these gifts of the Lord become, the more, and the more interiorly the spiritual things are present in the outermost of our natural life.

  Conjugial love is the love for one of the sex. It is the love for that spiritual truth only which alone fits our will as our own property, by which wisdom and love or understanding and will become one man and thus one flesh. Love for the sex, that is love for the truths in the natural, is a natural love. This love should not enter into the will or the body but only into the understanding. It is meant to be followed by conjugial love which is a spiritual love and which is the desire for conjunction into one in the will. The bringing of the truths in the natural into the will, together with a delight in those truths, results not only in a strengthening of the proprium but also in a falsification of truth and a violation of good. The taking up of these truths without a desire for conjugial love, thus without a desire for that spiritual truth that fits our will, makes us see in fullness the evils and the falsities of the proprium in which we live. As strength is lacking, a combat against these evils and falsities appears to us as not possible, wherefore redemption is expected from the taking up of more truths in the natural. The germ of faith alone would then receive its existence.

  The chaste love of the sex is only there where conjugial love is; for the spiritual love of truth loves the truths in the natural for the sake of the spiritual. Conjugial love is  in the fulness of the true  love of the  sex when  the spiritual truth in the will is conjoined into one as into one man or into one flesh.

  All our love for the truths of the wisdom of the Third

 

35                    H. D. G. GROENEVELD

 

Testament, given to the Church, must therefore contain in it the desire for conjagial love, in order that the man of the Church may become a husband and the woman of the Church may become a wife. For Heaven is one marriage and life there is only possible in conjugial love. Now it is given to those who are in the New Church to possess the true conjugial love, as appears from the work on CONJUGIAL LOVE, where in n. 43 the following is written: "After these things an Angel appeared to me out of that [the third]  Heaven, holding in his hand a parchment, which he unrolled, saying: I saw that you were meditating about conjugial love. In this parchment there are arcana of wisdom concerning that love, which have never yet been uncovered in the world. They must now be uncovered, because it is of importance. Those arcana in our Heaven are more than in the rest, because we are in the marriage of love and wisdom; but I foretell that no others will appropriate that love to themselves but those who are received by the Lord into the New Church, which is the New Jerusalem"

36

BLANK

37 

DE HEMELSGHE LEER

EXTRACT FROM THE ISSUE FOR OCT.—DEC. 1932

 

A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE ESSENCE OF THE LATIN WORD AND THE DIVINITY OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH

 

     BETWEEN THE REVEREND ALBERT BJORCK, AND THE REVDS. THEO. PITCAIRN AND ERNST PFEIFFER. 

(Note by the Editor: The text of this correspondence has here been reduced to the matter strictly bearing on the subject.)

 

REV. ERNST PFEIFFER TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK

 March 16th 1932.

 

Dear Mr. Bjorck.

Please accept our thanks for your pamphlet on the Doctrine of the Church.* I have read the three articles with great interest.

  Although from a first reading we are convinced that the truth of your central argument, — namely "that the natural degree of the mind regarded in itself is continuous, but that there  comes into existence an appearance of discreteness in it by the influx of the spiritual and celestial degrees" (cf. D.L.W. 256) — has been fully realized in our position as propounded in DE HEMELSCHE LEER, we have the impression that your pamphlet is a very valuable contribution to the difficult issue with which the Church is confronted at the present time. It impresses us as of great importance that your specific point is pressed forward by you with so much stress, and that it has now been presented by you with such ability and plainness. We strongly feel that this will contribute much to the possibility of a mutual understanding.

 

 *  Three  Studies on the Doctrine of the Church, by the REV. ALBERT BJORCK. Printed and Published for the Author by W. J. Parrett, Ltd., Margate, 1932.

 

38                A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

  In the 5th paragraph on page 28 of your pamphlet you say: "The highest rational sight of spiritual truth that man in the world can ever acquire is on a lower degree than that of the angels, but it corresponds to the doctrine the angels in heaven have, and that doctrine is the same as the spiritual sense of the Word".  The point of difference between Angels and men which you here have in mind, is that the latter are still in the natural body. As long as man lives in the natural body he is sensuously conscious only in the external man, while after the death of the body he becomes sensuously conscious in the internal man. This is indeed an immense difference; and since the external man even of a celestial man is still discretely lower than the internal man of an Angel of the lowest Heaven, this accounts for what is said about the degrees of Verum Divinum in n. 8443 of the ARCANA, a very important passage which you have quoted on page 29 of your pamphlet. According to this passage man is in the sixth degree,' and he cannot comprehend the higher degrees except some small measure of the fifth degree, such as is in the ultimate or first Heaven.

  But this does not take away the fact that the degrees of the mind must be opened while man lives in the natural body. Angels and men alike must be differentiated as to the three discrete degrees of life and of truth, and this differentiation is based not upon a qualification of the two higher degrees, but through regeneration, by influx, upon a qualification of the natural degree. This fact is thus valid for both Angels and men alike. Your argument as developed on page 21, paragraph one: "Men on earth, who in the Word they have while living in the world, see truths that teach love to the neighbor, and whose lives are formed by those truths, are in the spiritual heavens after the death of the body", and "Likewise those who while men on earth, in the Word they have, see truths that teach love to the Lord and whose lives are formed by those truths, are in the celestial heavens after the death of the body", according to my understanding does not account  for that  differentiation  of the three discrete degrees of truth,  and it seems to me to be altogether insufficient to explain the difference between a natural Church, a spiritual Church, and a celestial Church. For

 

39                        REV. ERNST PFEIFFER TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK

 

everything you say to characterize the spiritual and the celestial is also an indispensable requisite for an interior natural Church, which as to its internal is in conjunction with the ultimate Heaven. If a man does not see truths in the Word which teach love to the neighbor and love to the Lord, and if his life is not formed by those truths, he is not even within the most ultimate borders of the interior natural Church. Love to the neighbor and to the Lord make the Church and Heaven even in the last degree. There are three discrete degrees, even with man as long as he lives in this world, of seeing truths that teach love to the neighbor and of living accordingly, and there are three discrete degrees of seeing truths that teach love to the Lord and of living accordingly. In your letter of March 3rd you explicitly deny the existence of a discretely distinct natural Doctrine, spiritual Doctrine, and celestial  Doctrine, although these are spoken of in the Third Testament itself (cf. for instance A.R. 350), and

 

moreover they can clearly be seen in the comparative description in the ARCANA of the Adamic and the Noachic and the Hebrew Churches.

  From our study of the difference between the natural and the rational, — which indeed as to their basis both belong to the natural degree of the mind, — we are led to hold that there are with man three discrete degrees of Doctrine, and thus of doctrinals, cognitions, and scientifics. We readily admit that these degrees are not in themselves discrete, but that they in reality only appear to be discrete because they are discretely qualified by the influx of the spiritual  and  the celestial degrees. But nevertheless, this apparent discreteness is as real, as if it were really a substantial discreteness, and there is no relation between these apparently discrete  degrees but that of correspondence.  Each of these three apparently discrete degrees of the natural mind has its own discretely different doctrinals, cognitions, and scientifics.

  According to our understanding it is the interior natural that makes the man of the natural Church; it is the exterior rational that makes the man of the spiritual Church; and it is the interior  rational  that  makes  the  man  of  the celestial Church. According to this view it is thus plain that it is a qualification of the natural degree of the mind

 

40                    A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

into apparently discrete degrees, by the influx of the spiritual  and  of  the  celestial,  that  makes  the  difference between the natural, spiritual, and celestial Churches. For all  of  those  degrees,  namely the interior natural, the exterior rational, and the interior rational, as to their basic essence, belong to the natural degree of the human mind. If this were not the case it would not be necessary for man to be born first in the natural world. Here you may see how the teaching that the natural degree of the human mind regarded in itself is continuous, but that there comes into existence the appearance of discreteness by the influx of the spiritual and celestial degrees, has fully been realized in our position. Regarded as to their basis the interior natural, the exterior rational, and the interior rational, form a continuous degree, because all of them belong to the natural degree of the human mind; but through correspondence with the two higher degrees, namely the spiritual and celestial, if these flow in, there is the full appearance of discreteness.

  As long as an interior natural man lives in this world, he is sensuously conscious only in the external of the interior natural; when he leaves this world he becomes sensuously conscious in the internal of the interior natural. As long as a spiritual man lives in this world, he is sensuously conscious only in the external of the exterior rational; when he leaves this world he becomes sensuously conscious in the internal of the exterior rational. As long as a celestial man lives in this world he is sensuously conscious only in the external of the interior rational; when he leaves this world he becomes sensuously conscious in the internal of the interior rational. And whereas, as I pointed out before, the external of even the celestial man is discretely lower than the internal of the interior natural man, it is quite plain why in one specific sense it is said in the number quoted by you (A. 8443), that man compared with the Angels is in the lowest, namely the sixth, degree. But this regards rather the full sensuously conscious enjoyment of the different degrees of truths than the essential possession of the concepts of the different degrees of truths. Therefore it is said in this  specific sense that man cannot grasp the higher degrees of truths. But on the other hand it would seem evident that the doctrinals. cognitions. and scientifics

 

41                    REV. ERNST PFEIFFER TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK

 

of the Adamic man were discretely higher than those of the Noachic man — although this discreteness is not a discreteness in itself but draws its origin from the influx of the two higher degrees — and likewise, in a general way, that the doctrinals, cognitions, and scientifics of a celestial man are discretely higher than those of a spiritual man, and those of a spiritual man discretely higher than those of a natural man. The Doctrine, doctrinals, cognitions, and scientifics of the celestial man of the New Church will be discretely higher than those of the men of all previous Churches except the Adamic. Those men could never grasp these thoughts and concepts. Your statement, however, that "the highest rational sight of spiritual truth that man in the world can ever acquire is on a lower degree than that of the angels", would give to the Angels of the lowest Heaven a higher rational insight of spiritual truth than to a spiritual or even to a celestial man, a conclusion which, it seems to me, can hardly be maintained, if one realizes that the spiritual man thinks out of the exterior rational, and the celestial man out of the interior rational or out of the rational proper (cf. A. C. 1914), while an Angel of the ultimate Heaven cannot think in the rational proper at all but can only think in the interior natural, receiving an unconscious influx of the rational.

  In using the words "the highest rational insight that man in the world can ever acquire" you seem to indicate that you look for the cause of the difference between the state of man as long as he lives in the world and his state after death in the apparently discrete degrees of the natural degree of the mind — namely the different degrees of the rational which can be distinguished — while in reality the difference of these degrees is valid for both Angels and men alike. The real difference between the states of man before and after the death of the body, does not lie in the difference between a lower and a higher rational, but between the external and the internal of the different degrees of the rational.  Both Angels and men alike are distinguished by the different degrees of the rational; but man is sensuously conscious only in the external of his respective degree, while the Angels are sensuously conscious in the internal of their respective degree.

  To illustrate this still further: If a man has become a

 

42                 A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

celestial man this is by virtue of the fact that he has been introduced from the Lord into the interior rational, or the rational proper. This is the highest degree of rational insight for both men and Angels alike. Nevertheless as long as he lives in this world he is sensuously conscious only in the external of it, and the thoughts of the celestial Angels who are in the internal of if, exceed by far his own thoughts, so that they cannot be compared. But it would be a wrong conclusion to think that "his rational insight" is on a lower degree than that of the Angels of the second or of the ultimate Heaven. He has truly rational concepts which the lower Angels could never grasp, the Angels of the lowest Heaven not being in the rational at all, but in the natural, and receiving only an influx of the rational. And yet it is true that the light of truth of the Angels even of the lowest Heaven in a certain sense exceeds his light, because they are sensuously conscious in the internal of the interior natural which is discretely higher than the external of the interior rational in which he is sensuously conscious. Yet they are only in an interior natural light, while he is in a truly rational light. I would say that this is confirmed by the fact that the states of regeneration represented by the life of Isaac refer to things which must occur as long as man lives in this world, and not only after the death of the body. But nevertheless we have fully taken into account the great importance and significance of your central argument on the part which the natural degree plays in man's life, as long as he lives in this world.

  For the sake of illustration I would like to ask you what you would think of the following formulation of the contents of the second paragraph on page 68 of your pamphlet. I would suggest to have it read like this: "The celestial sense of the Third Testament as it is with the Angels in the Third Heaven, cannot be seen by man on earth, but it can be seen in a corresponding form by man on earth, and that form is the form the Divine Truths take in the external of the interior rational of a celestial man. And likewise, the spiritual sense as it is with the Angels in the Second Heaven, cannot be seen by man on earth, but it can be seen in a corresponding form by man on earth, and that form is the form the Divine Truths take

 

43            REV. ERNST PFEIFFER TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK  

 

in the external of the exterior rational of a spiritual man. And likewise, the spiritual-natural sense as it is with the Angels in the First Heaven, cannot be seen by man on earth, but it can be seen in a corresponding form by man on earth, and that form is the form the Divine Truths take in the external of the interior natural of a spiritual-natural man".

  In the third paragraph of the same page you say: "The internal sense which men of the Church in the world can see  is  one  with their  rational  understanding  of  the Word...", but exactly the same is true of the Angels likewise,  as  you  pointed out yourself on page 48, line 2—10. This is thus not where the difference lies of man's state before and after the death of the body. The difference to us, as I pointed out before, would seem to lie in the fact that as long as he lives in the world, man is sensuously conscious only in the external of the different apparent degrees of the natural degree, while after the death of the body he becomes sensuously conscious in the internal of those degrees. This internal is the truly angelic spiritual or celestial itself, into which man can never come as long as he lives in this world. But with both Angels and men alike the discreteness of the different degrees of the mind is dependent on the same qualification not of the two higher degrees but of the natural degree into a very substantial though in itself only apparent discreteness.

  I suppose you will have received the proofs of the article by Mr. Groeneveld on The Coming of the Lord for Conjunction with the Church, together with an elucidation which I gave of this article.* From this, our position with regard to the discrete degrees of internal truths which since the Incarnation of the Lord must become the basis for the thought of the Church, may become quite clear. It seems to us that unless there would be a qualification of the natural degree itself into a practically very real, though in itself only apparent, discreteness, the difference between a celestial, a spiritual, and a natural Church, would be non-essential. And therefore it seems to me that your central point, namely on the great significance of the

 

  * DE HEMELSCHE LEER, Third Fasc. pp. 86-108.

 

44      A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

natural degree of the mind in its relation to the two higher degrees, is the very stronghold of our position; for the foundation of the celestial and spiritual degrees does not lie in these degrees themselves, but in the natural degree, with both Angels and men alike.

  I would also be grateful if you would let me know what you think of what has been developed in these proofs concerning the ages of the human race; namely that the Third Testament is essentially addressed to the old age or celestial state of the human race, when it is prepared to enter into the interior rational. I wonder how you think this compares with your thought that the Third Testament is the Lord speaking to the human race when it has arrived at the age of rationality (see page 70, paragraph one). The age of rationality of which you speak, if I understand you correctly,  is  that of early manhood  (juventus),  when  the influx of the rational is being received in the interior natural.

                            ERNST PFEIFFER

  REV. THEO. PITCAIRN TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK

  March 28th 1932. Dear Mr. Bjorck.

  Thank you for the pamphlet you sent me. I think it will perform an important use if read extensively; it appears to me that it would be very useful for the NEW CHURCH LIFE to publish it, and thus bring it to the attention of the Church at large.

  One of your statements which does not appear in agreement with the Latin Word is to the effect that the Doctrine of the Church is not Divine. In the ARCANA CELESTIA 3712 we read: "Divine Doctrine is Divine Truth; and Divine Truth is all the Word of the Lord. Divine Doctrine itself is the Word in the supreme sense;  ... from this Divine Doctrine is the Word in the internal sense; ... Divine Doctrine is also the Word in the literal sense; . . . and whereas the literal sense contains within it the internal sense, and this the supreme sense, and as the literal sense altogether corresponds thereto, ... therefore also the Doctrine therefrom is Divine. ... But Divine Truth is the Divine Good appearing in Heaven before the Angels and on earth

 

45             REV. THEO. PITCAIRN TO REV. ALBERT BJORCK  

 

before men, and although it is apparent, nevertheless it is Divine Truth." The APOCALYPSE REVEALED, n. 157, like many other passages, speaks of "Divine truths out of the Word" with men. In n. 193 in reference to the New Church it says that "Divine Truth will be written on their hearts". While n. 920, also referring to the New Church, says that "All who are in the good of life and believe in the Lord, will there live according to Divine truths, and will see them inwardly within themselves as an eye sees objects". The APOCALYPSE EXPLAINED, n. 395, says that "The white robes which were given them, signify the Divine Truth from the Lord with them". From these and other passages it is clear that the genuine truths from the Lord with the man of the Church are called Divine truths. Yet it is also clear that there is an infinite difference between the Divine truths with man and the Divine Truths that were with the Lord, or, to use the representation in the above passage, between the garments of Angels and men and the garments of the Lord. In the Latin Word the word "Divine" is most frequently used in relation to the Divine Itself, and the Divine Human itself, that is, to the Divine above the Heavens. Wherefore the word Divine as used in the Church is usually synonymous with the Infinite.  Yet the Divine which makes Heaven and the Church, that is, the Divine goods and truths which have been received in the Church, are also called Divine, although being in a finite receptacle they are not infinite.

  You speak in your STUDIES as if there would not be a discrete degree between the Doctrine of the natural, the spiritual, and the celestial Church in the New Church, for the reason that while man lives on earth he is in the natural, and the natural is of one degree. Yet is it not evident that there was  a  discrete  degree of difference between the Adamic Church, the Noachic Church, and the Hebrew Church? That there will be similar degrees in the New Church is clearly taught in the APOCALYPSE REVEALED, n. 350, and following numbers, where we read: "Of the tribe of Judah were sealed twelve thousand, signifies celestial love ... with all who will be in the Lord's New Heaven and New Church. In the supreme sense Judah signifies the Lord as to celestial love; in the spiritual sense the celestial kingdom of the Lord, and the Word; and in the natural

   

46                    A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

sense the Doctrine of the celestial Church out of the Word. But here Judah signifies celestial love, which is love to the Lord; and because he is mentioned first in the series, it signifies that love with all who will be in the Lord's New Heaven and New Church; for the tribe first named is the all in the rest". This is a proof that the essential New Church is a celestial Church. In n. 351: "Reuben signifies wisdom out of celestial love with those who will be in the Lord's New Heaven and New Church". In n. 360: "Joseph signifies the doctrine of good and truth with those who will be in the Lord's New Heaven and New Church. Joseph signifies the Lord as to the Divine Spiritual; in the spiritual sense the Lord's spiritual kingdom". In the APOCALYPSE EXPLAINED, n. 5557, we read: "As by Samaria, the metropolis of the Israelites, in the Word is signified the spiritual Church, and by Jerusalem, the metropolis of the Jews, the celestial Church, both as to Doctrine they are called women". In the ARCANA CELESTIA, n. 4279, we read: "The sense of the Word is according to the Heavens; the supreme sense ... is for the inmost or third Heaven; its internal sense . . . is for the middle or second Heaven; but the lower sense . . . is for the lowest or first Heaven; but the lowest or literal sense is for man while still living in the world, who nevertheless is such that the interior sense, and even the internal and supreme sense, can be communicated to him; for man has communication with the three Heavens". And in n. 2242: "While the Word as to the letter is for man, as to the internal sense it is for the Angels, as also for those men to whom, out of the Lord's Divine mercy, it is given, while living in the world, to be like the Angels".

  From the above it is evident that in the New Church there will be a Doctrine of the natural Church, a Doctrine of the spiritual Church, and a Doctrine of the celestial Church, and that these Doctrines are communicated from Heaven out of the spiritual and the celestial sense of the Word. In your STUDIES you have brought out passages which teach that while man lives in the body, he thinks on the plane of the natural mind, and the natural mind is continuous. While the natural mind is continuous, its form is totally qualified by the internal degree that is opened, so that it is as it were discrete, as is illustrated by the fol-

 

47         REV. ALBERT BJORCK TO REV. THEO. PITCAIRN 

 

lowing comparison. The body of an animal, a tree, and a stone, are all in the same degree, nevertheless due to the soul or atmosphere which acts upon them and forms them, there is as it were a discrete degree of difference between the body of an animal, a plant, and a stone. DE HEMELSCHE LEER teaches throughout that the literal sense of the Doctrine .of the Church is natural, nevertheless the literal sense of the Doctrine of the Church is totally qualified by the degree of the mind of the Church which has been opened. Thus the literal sense of the Doctrine of the natural Church, of the spiritual Church, and of the celestial Church, would differ in a corresponding way as a stone, a tree, and an animal differ.

  While a man in the natural world thinks in the natural, this does not mean that essentially a man who has had the celestial degree of his mind opened, is not wiser than an Angel of the natural Heaven; for a man in. Heaven, comes into the essentials of the things he had on earth. It is evident that a man of the Most Ancient Church was essentially wiser while living on earth, than a man of the Hebrew Church is in Heaven.

  While it appears to me that in the points referred to above you did not go far enough, I enjoyed reading your booklet very much, and I believe it will perform a use in the Church.

                        THEODORE PITCAIRN

  REV. ALBERT BJORCK TO REV. THEO. PITCAIRN

  April 14th 1932. Dear Mr. Pitcairn.

  In your recent letter you say: "One of your statements which does not seem in agreement with the Latin Word is to the effect that the Doctrine of the Church is not Divine". It has not been my intention to make any statement to that effect. I certainly believe that the Doctrine of genuine truth in the Church is Divine. In the beginning of the third study I quoted from the Doctrine of the GENERAL CHURCH as stated in the Liturgy: "Since the Lord is the Word, He also is Doctrine from the Word in the Church", etc. (at bottom of p. 31). And on p. 77 I say: "The Doctrine of the

 

48                 A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

Church therefore in a very real sense is the Coming of the Lord to the Church and to the individual man of the Church, if the Doctrine is from a genuine understanding of the Divine Truth in the Word of His Second Coming".

  The fact that you understand me to deny the Divinity of the Doctrine of genuine truth in the Church seems to me an indication that when we speak of the Divine Doctrine we have different concepts of what is meant by the term. Statements in DE HEMELSCHE LEER have also given me this impression. Sometimes the Doctrine of the Church is  there defined as a vision of the Divine Truth in the Word. If the vision is true, and the thought or understanding is a true form of that vision, I think we all agree. But in some places the Doctrine of the Church is spoken of in a way that seems to imply that it is not thought of as the result of, or equivalent with, a true understanding of the Word, but as something abstract which gives light to our understanding, and yet is not the same as the Divine Doctrine of the Word. I have been at a loss to understand clearly just what is meant by the Doctrine of the Church as spoken of in DE HEMELSCHE LEER, seeing that it is claimed that no falsity from man's understanding can adhere to it.

  The references you give in your letter do not clear up the difficulty. Divine Truth is certainly Divine Doctrine, but men may have a certain understanding of Divine Truth, be guided by it, and by the truth they see' and obey be conjoined to the Lord, while this understanding of the Divine Truth is still very imperfect and even mixed with falsities.

  I agree that the difference between the Adamic, the Noahtic, and the First Christian Church is one of discrete degrees, but when you proceed from this to say that similar discrete degrees will arise in the New Church, I disagree. Nor can I see that the references you give offer support for that thought if compared with other teaching. What is said in the ARCANA CELESTIA about Jacob and his sons and Israel and the tribes has led me to a different understanding, the main features I will try to set forth as plainly as I can in a few words. All the tribes together make one Church, though Judah is the head. The other tribes  signify  different states of those within the New

 

49                REV. ALBERT BJORCK TO REV. THEO. PITCAIRN

 

Church who by means of the celestial doctrine from the Latin Word can be regenerated.

  The Latin Word reveals the Lord's Divine Human as infinite Love and Wisdom, His Love one with Life itself and Substance itself going out to give of itself to others, and His Wisdom the form of His Love, Life, and Substance, one with and inseparable from them. The universal and particular faith of the New Church as stated in the TRUE, CHRISTIAN RELIGION, n. 2 and 3, is the faith taught by the Latin Word, and the truths of the Word proceed from the Lord's Love for saving men and are all together Divine Doctrine. The central teaching is that the Lord is the one God of heaven and earth and that He is Love and Wisdom itself. That is celestial doctrine even when understood in a natural way, as it generally is at first.  An  affirmative  disposition  to  the  doctrine  from natural good is the first of regeneration and is signified by Dan. Under the influence and guidance of the Doctrine Dan may become Joseph; but if the affirmative disposition is not accompanied by the shunning of evil and doing of good, the state signified by Dan is not really within the boundary of the Church, even if a man's natural understanding is enlightened and becomes intelligent, and therefore may be said to be signified by Ephraim, who represents the understanding of the Word, both true and false, in the Church. In the APOCALYPSE the tribes of Dan and Ephraim are not among those called. But as long as we live in the world we cannot judge whether a man's voluntary  is  affected  by  his  knowledge or understanding of Divine teaching or not, and therefore whether he is of the Church or not.

   The Doctrine of the New Church is celestial because proceeding from the Lord's Love, and the New Church is therefore celestial in its essence from the beginning, however different the reception of its Doctrine is with the men of the Church. Judah, or love of the Lord, is the head, and from that head all the tribes are governed or guided, even they whose understanding of the Divine Truths is most natural.

   The understanding I get from the ARCANA CELESTIA and the Latin Word in general is that the three heavens, the highest, based on the Adamic Church, the second,

 

50                     A CORRESPONDENCE ON THE DOCTRINE

 

based on the Noahtic Church, and the first, based now entirely on the New Church, make one whole, and each one is a discrete degree in that whole. You cannot divide each one of the three heavens in discrete degrees, although the angels  which  constitute  them  receive the  Lord's  life differently. This difference in their reception of life from the Lord merely decides whether they are in the east, south, west, or north of the heaven they are in. This understanding seems to be supported also by the fact that the three heavens correspond to the three atmospheres, aura, ether, and air, each of which is in a continuous degree.

   The inmost and interior minds in the New Church would then seem to correspond to the aura and ether within the air, which has more of the effluvia and vapors of the earth in the lower regions than in the higher, decreasing in  density continuously. The relation in the TRUE CHRISTIAN RELIGION, n. 386, may be of aid to understand my meaning. The angel from the east I think of as in the state signified by Judah, while he from the south in the state signified by Reuben or Joseph.

  In the spiritual world the interior state of the angels decides their location and eternal surroundings. Here we cannot judge concerning a man's interior, and the interior state of a man here is constantly changing according to regeneration. To think of the New Church in the future as divided in discrete degrees, forming a celestial Church, a spiritual Church, and a natural Church, each with its own separate Doctrine,  seems to me erroneous. Nevertheless there will always be in the Church grades of celestial life, in that some will see the truths of Doctrine from love to the Lord, some from charity or wisdom from that love, and some from love of use without any deeper understanding of the love and wisdom.

  I am aware that the view I have tried to put before you, may seem in opposition to other teaching found in the Latin Word. It needs elaboration and elucidation, but it would take considerable time to do that. I can only say that it is the result of a true desire to understand the Latin Word and of much reflection on what is said there.                                                                      ALBERT BJORCK

  INDEX

NEXT PAGES

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source pages

Authors: Leon James &  Diane Nahl Webmaster: I.J. Thompson